AQA A-Level Biology Paper 2, June 2025: Question 7
11 marks · Medium difficulty · Practical Techniques & Data Analysis
Evaluate an investigation on Gammarus pulex response to light intensity in a choice chamber, identify the taxis behaviour, formulate a null hypothesis, and interpret chi-squared results.
Practise this questionQuestion
Question text
07.1 Figure 3 shows Gammarus pulex, commonly known as a freshwater shrimp.
Figure 3
A student used a choice chamber to investigate the effect of light intensity on the
movement of G. pulex.
The student:
• collected 30 shrimps from a freshwater stream
• added freshwater and gravel substrate from the same stream to each segment
• used layers of black paper on the lid of the choice chamber to reduce the
percentage light intensity in 3 segments of the choice chamber as shown in
Figure 4
• placed 30 shrimps at the centre of the choice chamber
• waited 10 minutes before counting the number of shrimps in each segment.
Figure 4
The student stated that ‘the procedure used in this investigation helps to ensure the
validity of any conclusions made’.
Suggest and explain three features of this investigation that justify this statement.
[3 marks]
07.2 Table 3 shows the student’s results.
Table 3
Segment of choice Percentage light Number of G. pulex counted
chamber intensity after 10 minutes
A 0 15
B 25 8
C 50 4
D 100 3
The student observed directional movement by G. pulex.
Name the type of behaviour shown by G. pulex and suggest an advantage to G. pulex
of this behaviour.
Use the information in Table 3 in your answer.
[2 marks]
Type of behaviour
Advantage
The student analysed the results in using the chi-squared test (χ2) and
07.3 Table 3
calculated a χ2 value of 11.87
shows the critical values of χ2 at different probability ( ) values for different
Table 4 P
degrees of freedom.
Table 4
Critical values of χ2 at different values
P
Degrees
P = 0.95 P = 0.5 P = 0.05 P = 0.01 P = 0.005
of freedom
10.00 0.46 3.84 6.64 7.88
20.10 1.39 5.99 9.21 10.60
30.35 2.37 7.82 11.35 12.84
40.71 3.36 9.49 13.28 14.86
51.15 4.35 11.07 15.09 16.75
State a null hypothesis for this investigation and explain why the χ2 test was the
appropriate statistical test to use.
[2 marks]
Null hypothesis
Explanation for using a χ2 test
Using the calculated χ2 value of 11.87 and the information in , what can you
07.4 Table 4
conclude from this investigation?
You should include the terms probability and chance in your answer.
[4 marks]
Mark scheme
Show the mark scheme
Question Marking Guidance Mark Comments
1. First 3 options can
1. Same/stream water/gravel so natural/usual/
refer to same
normal habitat/environment
stream/water/gravel or
stream water/gravel
OR
1. Accept ‘so light is
Same/stream water/gravel so normal/usual the only variable’ for
behaviour ‘so variables
controlled’
OR
1. 2. Accept 30/large
Same/stream water/gravel so variables sample so reduces
controlled/same effect of anomalies
OR 2. Ignore ‘so reliable
mean’ obtained
Same/stream water so oxygen/pH controlled/
same; 4. Accept ‘get used to
the conditions’ for
2. 30/large sample so representative/reliable; 3 max acclimatise
07.1 (3 x
3. (Placed at) centre so same distance to each AO3) 4. Enough time to
segment/light intensity move ‘without
qualification’ is
OR insufficient for mark
(Placed at) centre so no bias;
4. (10 minute) delay so shrimps can
acclimatise/equilibrate;
OR
(10 minute) delay so shrimps enough time to
respond/react/distribute
OR
(10 minute) delay so shrimps not stressed–; A-LEVEL BIOLOGY – 7402/2 –
2. Accept ‘consumers’
1. (Negative photo) taxis;
for ‘predators’
2. Predation less likely
2. Accept ‘stops
OR predation’
2. Accept ‘hides from
Less visible to predators/prey
predator/prey’
OR
07.2 (2 x
AO2) 2. Accept descriptions
Less likely to be prey of reduced predation
e.g. ‘fewer are eaten’
OR
2. Accept ‘move to
Move away from heat cooler place
OR /conditions’
– A-LEVEL BIOLOGY – 7402/2 –
Move towards food;
1. There is no (significant) difference in the 1.Accept ‘shrimps
distribution/ movement /behaviour/number of show no preference for
shrimps at different light intensities (different) light
intensity/intensities
OR
1. Accept correlation
(Different) light intensity/intensities
for mark point 1 but
has/have no effect/relationship on/with the
2 ignore for mark point
distribution/movement/behaviour of
07.3 (2 x 2.
shrimp(s);
AO2)
2. The data are discrete/categoric
OR
(To determine) if there is a difference between the
observed and expected
(results/data/values/frequencies);
Note. All 4 marks can
Route A – 4 max
only be obtained via
2 route A.
1. (The calculated / χ (value)/11.87) is
There are 2 max
greater than 7.82 / 11.35;
marks for route B
ignoring mark points
2. The probability of the difference being
1 and 4.
due to chance is less than 5% / 0.05 /
Route B allows credit
1% / 0.01
for understanding of
probability although
OR
context incorrect.
16 Use the route
The probability of the difference not
providing most
being due to chance is more than 95% /
marks.
0.95 / 99% / 0.99;
2. Reject 0.005% /
3. There is a significant difference; 4
0.05% / 50% / 0.001% /
07.4 (4 x
0.01% / 10%
4. Reject the null hypothesis; AO3)
2. Accept P for
Route B – 2 max probability
Ignore mark point 1 and 4
2 and 3. if no reference
to difference is the only
2. The probability of the difference being due to error in both 2 and 3
chance is more than 5% / 0.05 / 1% / 0.01 allow one mark
4. Accept Ho for null
OR
hypothesis
The probability of the difference not being due to
chance is less than 95% / 0.95 / 99% / 0.99;
3. There is no significant difference;
How to answer it
Choice Chambers, Simple Animal Responses and Chi-Squared Analysis
This multi-part question assesses practical methodology, simple organism responses (taxes vs kineses), and statistical interpretation using the chi-squared (χ²) test:
- Experimental design & internal validity: Identifying control variables, habituation periods, and unbiased starting setups in choice-chamber experiments.
- Innate animal behaviours: Distinguishing directional responses (taxes) from non-directional movements (kineses) and rationalising their selective survival value.
- Statistical hypothesis testing: Formulating a rigorous null hypothesis and explaining why categorical count data demands a χ² test.
- Interpreting critical values: Determining degrees of freedom, comparing test statistics to critical cut-offs, and drawing standard A-Level biological conclusions using precise statistical wording.
Experimental Validity in Choice Chambers
Suggest and explain three features of this investigation that justify the student's statement regarding validity (3 marks)
✅ Mark Scheme Credit (Any 3 pairs of Suggest + Explain)
- Feature 1: Using stream water / gravel substrate from the same stream...
→ Explanation: Keeps conditions natural / ensures light is the only variable affecting movement (controls abiotic factors like pH and O₂ concentration). - Feature 2: Large sample size (30 shrimps)...
→ Explanation: Ensures data is representative / reduces the impact of anomalous individual behaviours. - Feature 3: Placing shrimps in the centre at the start...
→ Explanation: Shrimps are equal distance from each light segment, preventing initial positional bias. - Feature 4: 10-minute waiting delay before recording...
→ Explanation: Allows animals time to acclimatise, calm down after handling stress, and freely distribute.
🧠 Exam Technique: Suggest & Explain
This is a paired question: simply quoting the method gets 0 marks. Every feature you extract from the bullet points must have a biological justification:
- Never just say "it was fair". State exactly which confounding variable was controlled.
- Never say "so it was reliable" on its own. For a sample size of 30, specify that it is representative or reduces the effect of anomalies.
- If mentioning the 10-minute delay, state that it permits acclimatisation or recovery from handling stress.
❌ Common Errors
- Vague timing: Writing "10 minutes gives them time to move" without qualifying that they need time to explore/acclimatise was rejected.
- Confusing accuracy with validity: Saying "stream water makes it more accurate" instead of explaining that it prevents other variables (pH, salinity) from influencing the choice.
Classifying Behaviour and Evolutionary Advantage
Name the type of behaviour shown and suggest an advantage to G. pulex (2 marks)
✅ Correct Answer
Type of behaviour:
- (Negative photo)taxis (Accept: taxis / negative phototaxis)
Advantage:
- Predation is less likely / less visible to predators (or less visible to prey).
- Also accept: Moves away from heat / reaches cooler water / moves towards decaying food in dark crevices.
💡 Key Knowledge: Taxes vs Kineses
- Taxis: A directional movement response to a directional stimulus. Shrimps moved away from the light source into the 0% light area, showing negative phototaxis.
- Kinesis: A non-directional change in the speed of movement or rate of turning in response to stimulus intensity.
- Survival value: Freshwater shrimps live under stones/gravel. Remaining in darkness hides them from sighted aquatic predators (fish/birds).
❌ Common Errors
- Stating kinesis instead of taxis. The question specifically states: "observed directional movement", which is the definition of taxis.
- Writing just "survival" or "protection" without describing how (e.g. avoiding detection by predators).
Formulating a Null Hypothesis & Choosing χ²
State a null hypothesis and explain why the χ² test was appropriate (2 marks)
✅ Model Answers
Null Hypothesis:
There is no significant difference in the distribution / number of shrimps between the different light intensities.
OR: Light intensity has no effect on the movement / distribution of shrimps.
Explanation for using χ²:
- The data is categorical / discrete (counting frequencies/numbers of individuals in separate categories).
- OR: To determine if there is a significant difference between observed and expected frequencies.
🧠 Exam Technique: Perfect Null Hypotheses
- Always mention the word "significant" (e.g., "There is no significant difference...").
- State both variables explicitly: number/distribution of shrimps and different light intensities.
- Do not confuse difference with correlation: Chi-squared tests for differences in frequencies between categories, not correlation.
❌ Common Errors
- Saying continuous data: Stating that chi-squared is used for continuous data will lose the mark. Chi-squared is strictly for discrete categorical / frequency count data.
- Writing an alternative hypothesis: Saying "Light intensity will affect movement" instead of the null condition (no difference / no effect).
Interpreting Calculated Values and Drawing Conclusions
What can you conclude from calculated χ² = 11.87 and Table 4? Include "probability" and "chance" (4 marks)
📐 Step-by-Step Statistical Interpretation
- Step 1: Determine degrees of freedom (df):
df = number of categories - 1 = 4 - 1 = 3 - Step 2: Identify the critical value:
At p = 0.05 (standard significance level in biology), critical value for df = 3 is 7.82.
(Notice calculated χ² 11.87 is also greater than 11.35 at p = 0.01). - Step 3: Compare calculated value to critical value:
Calculated χ² (11.87) is greater than the critical value of 7.82 (and 11.35). - Step 4: Express probability (P) and chance:
The probability of the differences being due to chance is less than 5% (p < 0.05) [or less than 1% / p < 0.01]. - Step 5: Conclude on significance and the null hypothesis:
The difference is statistically significant; therefore, reject the null hypothesis.
✅ 4-Mark Model Answer (Route A)
1. The calculated χ² value of 11.87 is greater than the critical value of 7.82 (at p = 0.05, df = 3) [or greater than 11.35 at p = 0.01].
2. The probability that the difference in shrimp distribution is due to chance is less than 0.05 (less than 5%).
3. There is a statistically significant difference in shrimp distribution between light intensities.
4. Therefore, reject the null hypothesis.
❌ Critical Traps to Avoid
- Wrong degrees of freedom: Using df = 4 (critical value 9.49) instead of 3. There are 4 segments (A, B, C, D), so df = 4 − 1 = 3.
- Misconverting probability decimals: p = 0.05 is 5%, NOT 0.05%. The mark scheme explicitly states: Reject 0.05% or 0.005%.
- Omitting required terms: The question commanded you to use both words: probability and chance. Omitting either forfeits mark point 2!
- Stating results are "due to chance": The calculated value is higher than critical, so results are unlikely to be due to chance.
Topics
Biology · Practical skills · Required Practicals · 3.6 Organisms respond to changes in their internal and external environments (A-level only) · Experimental design · Data analysis · A-Level practicals (7–12)
Question and mark scheme from the AQA A-Level Biology examination, Paper 2, June 2025. QuestionVault is an independent revision resource; questions remain the copyright of the awarding body.