AQA A-Level Chemistry Paper 3, June 2018: Question 8
1 mark · Easy difficulty · Multiple Choice
Identify the conclusion that can be drawn from the back-scattering of alpha particles fired at a thin gold sheet.
Practise this questionQuestion
Question text
When He2+ particles were fired at a thin sheet of gold, about 1 in 8000 of the particles were
detected at point Q.
08 What conclusion can be drawn from the detection of He2+ particles at point Q?
[1 mark]
A Gold atoms have a small, positive nucleus.
B Gold atoms have electrons in orbitals.
C Gold consists of ions in a sea of delocalised electrons.
D Gold atoms have more protons than He2+ particles.
Mark scheme
Show the mark scheme
08 A
How to answer it
Rutherford's Alpha Scattering Experiment & Nuclear Structure
What this question tests
- Understanding historical evidence for atomic structure (Rutherford's α-particle scattering experiment).
- Linking experimental observations (backscattering/reflection of He²⁺ particles) to the physical model of the atom.
- Deducing the properties of the atomic nucleus: concentrated positive charge and extremely small volume compared to the overall atom.
Question 08
Detection of He²⁺ particles at Point Q • Multiple Choice [1 Mark]
✅ Correct Answer
A — Gold atoms have a small, positive nucleus.
💡 Key Knowledge: The Scattering Experiment
- The probe: He²⁺ particles are helium nuclei (alpha particles), which are relatively massive and carry a +2 positive charge.
- Position Q: Point Q represents backscattering (deflection angles > 90°).
- Why do they rebound? Only a massive, highly concentrated positive centre of charge could exert enough electrostatic repulsion to repel a fast-moving, positively charged He²⁺ particle backwards.
- Why only 1 in 8000? Since so few are deflected by large angles, this positively charged nucleus must occupy an extraordinarily small fraction of the total volume of the atom (most of the atom is empty space).
🧠 Exam Technique: Elimination Strategy
Always distinguish between a scientifically true statement and the direct conclusion of the experiment:
- A: Correct. Directly explains why positively charged particles bounce backward rarely (small + positive).
- B: Incorrect. Electron shells and orbitals were introduced later by Bohr and quantum mechanics; scattering does not show orbitals.
- C: Incorrect. While gold is indeed a metal with delocalised electrons, this observation does not prove metallic bonding models.
- D: Incorrect. Gold does have more protons (79 vs 2), but simply having more protons does not explain backscattering from a point-like centre.
❌ Common Errors
- Selecting true distractors: Students often choose C or D because they are factually correct statements taught in chemistry, forgetting that the question specifically asks for the conclusion drawn from the detection at point Q.
- Forgetting particle charge: Forgetting that He²⁺ is positively charged. If the nucleus were negative, the particles would be attracted and absorbed or deflected toward it, not repelled backwards.
Topics
Physical Chemistry · 3.1.1 Atomic Structure
Question and mark scheme from the AQA A-Level Chemistry examination, Paper 3, June 2018. QuestionVault is an independent revision resource; questions remain the copyright of the awarding body.