AQA A-Level English Literature A Paper 2: Texts in shared contexts (2A), June 2025: Question 2
25 marks · Hard difficulty · Extended Response
Examine the significance of fate and chance in Up the Line to Death, writing about at least two poems in your answer.
Practise this questionQuestion
Question text
or
02 Examine the significance of fate and chance in Up the Line to Death.
You must write about at least two poems in your answer.
[25 marks]
Mark scheme
Show the mark scheme
Question 02
Up the Line to Death – ed. Brian Gardner
Examine the significance of fate and chance in Up the Line to Death.
You must write about at least two poems in your answer.
[25 marks]
Possible content:
Please refer to pages 4 to 7.
AO5 Explore literary texts informed by different interpretations
Students might consider:
• both ‘fate’ and ‘chance’ equally or focus on one
• poems that focus on the helpless nature of trench warfare where death is a chance event unrelated
to personal choices or actions. For example, Nichol’s ‘Noon’ and Gibson’s ‘Breakfast’
• poems that explore fate in broader, more spiritual terms as a personal understanding of mortality;
for example, Seeger’s ‘Rendezvous’
• poems that explore fate in more ambiguous ways; such as Marriott-Watson’s ‘Kismet’ and
Thomas’s ‘No One Cares Less Than I’
• poems that focus on the broader aspects of fate as a moral obligation to fight for those who have
already died; for example, poems such as ‘In Flanders Fields’
• early war poems that present fate as part of a moral, patriotic imperative; for example, ‘Happy is
England Now’
• poems that focus on the absurd chaos of war where there is no overarching order, for example,
Graves’ ‘Dead Cow Farm’
• the keywords ‘fate’ and ‘chance’
• etc.
AO4 Explore connections across literary texts
Focus might be on:
• typical representations of fate and chance in the literature of WW1 and its aftermath
• the presentation of fate and chance as part of wider attitudes towards war
• etc.
AO3 Demonstrate understanding of the significance and influence of the contexts in which
literary texts are written and received
Focus might be on:
• how differing responses to fate and chance reflect changing attitudes to the war
• how cultural attitudes and values relating to fate and chance differ over time
• the differing literary approaches to the presentation of fate and chance
• etc.
AO2 Analyse ways in which meanings are shaped in literary texts
Focus might be on:
• aspects of poetic form and genre
• aspects of structure, eg use of stanzas
• aspects of language, eg rhyme, rhythm, imagery
• the organisation of the anthology
• etc.
AO1 Articulate informed, personal and creative responses to literary texts, using associated
concepts and terminology, and coherent, accurate written expression
• quality of argument
• organisation of ideas
• use of appropriate concepts and terminology
• technical accuracy.
Accept any valid interpretations, any valid comments on contexts and any valid discussion of
authorial methods.
How to answer it
Significance of Fate and Chance in Up the Line to Death
What this question tests (AQA A-Level Paper 2: WW1 and Its Aftermath)
This comparative poetry question tests your ability to sustain a conceptual argument across at least two poems from Brian Gardner's anthology, evaluating how combatants and observers conceived the forces governing survival and mortality.
AO2 (24%): Close analysis of poetic form, metre, caesura, stanzaic progression, and imagery.
AO4 & AO5 (24%): Cross-textual connections & multi-faceted interpretations (fate vs. chance).
Comparative Essay: Fate vs. Chance
"Examine the significance of fate and chance in Up the Line to Death. You must write about at least two poems in your answer."
💡 Key Knowledge: Conceptualising Fate vs. Chance
- Fate (Predetermination / Teleology): Implies an overarching cosmic, spiritual, or patriotic design. Early war poetry often framed death as an honourable, destined sacrifice ( Seeger , Brooke ).
- Chance (Arbitrary / Absurd): Reflects modern industrialised warfare (artillery shrapnel, random snipers) where survival is disconnected from moral worth or individual agency ( Gibson , Graves ).
- Anthology Trajectory: Brian Gardner structures Up the Line to Death chronologically into distinct thematic sections—charting a shift from romantic fatalism to disillusioned horror at sheer random destruction.
- Ambiguity: Figures like Edward Thomas treat premonition with philosophical hesitation rather than grand mythological certainty.
🧠 Exam Technique: Band 5 Comparative Strategy
- Define and Distinguish: In your introduction, explicitly distinguish between fate (destined, teleological, purposeful) and chance (aleatory, mechanised, absurd).
- Comparative Synthesis: Avoid writing two isolated mini-essays. Pair poems within paragraphs through conceptual linking words ( Whereas Seeger sanctifies... Gibson reduces... ).
- Integrate AO2 into Meaning: Never isolate rhyme scheme or metre without linking it to the question: e.g., rigid rhyming couplets mimic predetermined destiny, while fragmented metre reflects sudden, chaotic chance.
- Anthology Organisation: Reference Gardner’s editorial sequence (e.g., shifts between early patriotic sections and the grim realism of later sections) to score high in AO2 & AO4.
✅ Model Analytical Framework & Strong Poem Pairings
Alan Seeger – 'I Have a Rendezvous with Death' vs. Wilfrid Gibson – 'Breakfast'
- Seeger: Frames death as an elevated, romantic "rendezvous" and solemn destiny. Use of iambic cadence and personification of Death creates an inevitable, noble rendezvous.
- Gibson: Shatters this illusion with domestic bathos. A comrade is killed instantly while eating bread and butter; death is an indifferent, sudden stroke of pure chance.
Robert Graves – 'Dead Cow Farm' vs. Edward Thomas – 'No One Cares Less Than I'
- Graves: Reconfigures trench landscape into primordial chaos where bombs fall without logic, completely subverting biblical or providential order.
- Thomas: Adopts understated, stoic fatalism towards his impending end, refusing jingoistic heroics while acknowledging his inescapable destiny.
❌ Common Errors (Where Marks Are Lost)
- Treating 'Fate' and 'Chance' as Synonyms: The mark scheme specifically highlights differentiating the two terms. Conflating them destroys nuanced AO5 debate.
- Feature Spotting without Purpose: Identifying alliteration or enjambment without explaining how it reinforces randomness or inevitability.
- Biographical Narrative Drift: Spending paragraphs detailing the author's military regiment or death date instead of focusing on poetic form and language.
- Imbalanced Comparison: Writing 80% on one familiar poem and 20% on a second poem added as an afterthought.
📐 Top-Level Distinction: What Separates Band 4 and Band 5
- Band 4 (16–20 marks): Competent and coherent. Compares two poems clearly, explains how soldiers felt helpless, and points out metaphors accurately.
- Band 5 (21–25 marks): Conceptual and perceptive. Argues that "fate" was frequently used early in the war as an ideological coping mechanism to grant cosmic meaning to sacrifice, but was dismantled by industrialised warfare, which rendered survival a matter of cold, mathematical probability (chance).
- Structural Integration: Directly engages with Brian Gardner’s role as anthologist, noticing how the sequencing of poems dramatises this philosophical collapse.
Topics
WW1 and its aftermath · Up the Line to Death
Question and mark scheme from the AQA A-Level English Literature A examination, Paper 2: Texts in shared contexts (2A), June 2025. QuestionVault is an independent revision resource; questions remain the copyright of the awarding body.