AQA A-Level Geography Paper 1, June 2025: Question 4

36 marks · Hard difficulty · Extended Response

Assess glacial and periglacial processes and landscapes through questions on solifluction lobes, permafrost temperature trends, climate change challenges in alpine tundra, and the extent to which erosion shapes glaciated landscapes.

Practise this question

Question

Question 4 from an AQA A-Level Geography paper consisting of four parts: 04.1 asks to outline processes which lead to the formation of solifluction lobes (4 marks); 04.2 asks to analyse data in Figure 7 showing permafrost temperature variation in interior Alaska compared to northern Alaska from 1978 to 2020 (6 marks); 04.3 asks to use Figure 8 and own knowledge to assess challenges climate change is likely to pose in alpine tundra regions (6 marks); and 04.4 asks to what extent erosion has been the dominant process shaping a studied glaciated landscape (20 marks).
Question text

Question 4 Glacial systems and landscapes

04.1 Outline processes which lead to the formation of solifluction lobes.

[4 marks]

Extra space …

Figure 7 is in the insert.

Figure 7 shows permafrost temperature variation in interior Alaska compared to

northern Alaska from 1978 to 2020.

04.2 Analyse the data shown in Figure 7.

[6 marks]

… 8

(21)

Extra space …

Figure 8 is in the insert.

Figure 8 shows the impact on alpine tundra of a changing climate in Europe.

04.3 Using Figure 8 and your own knowledge, assess the challenges that climate change

is likely to pose in these alpine tundra regions.

[6 marks]

(22) …

Extra space …

04.4 With reference to a glaciated landscape that you have studied, to what extent has

erosion been the dominant process shaping the landscape?

[20 marks]

(23) …

… 25

(24)

Extra space …

… 26

(25) …

Mark scheme

Show the mark scheme Mark scheme for Question 4 detailing marking guidance for parts 04.1 through 04.4. 04.1 awards up to 4 marks for AO1 points detailing thawing of active layers, downslope movement, freeze-thaw cycles, and lobe formation. 04.2 provides a 2-level descriptor (AO3, 6 marks) for analysing permafrost trends and anomalies in Alaska. 04.3 provides a 2-level descriptor (AO1 2 marks, AO2 4 marks) for assessing climate change impacts on alpine tundra such as tree line shifts, ecosystem disruption, and recreation risks. 04.4 provides a 4-level mark scheme (AO1 10 marks, AO2 10 marks) assessing the role of erosion versus deposition, weathering, and fluvioglacial processes in glaciated landscapes.

Question 4 Glacial systems and landscapes

Total

Qu Part Marking guidance

marks

04 1 Outline processes which lead to the formation of solifluction lobes. 4

AO1=4

Point marked

Allow 1 mark per valid point with extra mark(s) for developed points (d).

For example:

Notes for answers

AO1

• The active layer (in a region experiencing permafrost) undergoes a

period of melting in the summer months (1).

• The active layer starts to slip under the force of gravity (1). This can

occur on gradients as low as 1 degree (1) (d).

• Daily frost heave also plays a role in the early summer months (1).

Here the soil particles are thrust towards the surface by the expansion

of the ice during cycles of freezing and thawing (1) (d).

• On some slopes a combination of these processes causes the

formation of terracettes (1).

• The lobe is formed when the front of the material slows when the

gradient lessens (1).

• The material behind the front continues to move causing a build of

material at the front and lobe shape forms (1) (d).

Max 3 if only one process is considered.

The notes for answers are not exhaustive. Credit any valid points.

04 2 Analyse the data shown in Figure 7. 6

AO3=6

AO3 – Responses should analyse the two data sets accurately, including

manipulation data, showing awareness of trends and relationships

between the two datasets.

Mark scheme

Level 2 (4–6 marks)

AO3 – Clear analysis of the quantitative evidence provided, which makes

appropriate use of data in support. Clear connection(s) between different

aspects of the data and evidence.

Level 1 (1–3 marks)

AO3 – Basic analysis of the quantitative evidence provided, which makes

limited use of data and evidence in support. Basic connection(s)

between different aspects of the data and evidence.

– A-LEVEL GEOGRAPHY – –

Notes for answers

AO3

• Interior Alaska is both warmer and has a narrower range of data

compared to Northern Alaska.

• There is clear evidence of warming across the two data sets. For

interior Alaska, the strong evidence is found in Old Man which has

warmed from around −3.1 °C to around −1.7 °C over a period of

around 36 years. This is an increase of temperature of around 1.4 °C.

• Livengood represents something of an anomaly for Interior Alaska. The

permafrost temperature remains at around 0.7 from 1983 to 2020 with

very little discernible variation.

• There is limited evidence to suggest any acceleration in the warming

more recently for Interior Alaska, with the exception of Old Man.

• When comparing the two data sets, most show a very slight cooling

between 2000 and 2002.

• The rate of increase in temperature is more noticeable for Northern

Alaska. For example, West Dock has an increase from −10 °C in 1978

to −7 °C in 2018, an increase of 3 °C.

• The biggest increase is found in Deadhorse, from −8.5 °C to −5.1 °C,

an increase of 3.4 °C over 32 years. Dead Horse also shows the most

fluctuation, particularly between 1978–1990 with four years showing a

decline in temperature. West Dock also experiences some significant

dips between 1983 and 1995.

• The overwhelming evidence is that the permafrost has become warmer

over the period for both data sets.

Credit any other valid analysis.

04 3 Using Figure 8 and your own knowledge, assess the challenges that 6

climate change is likely to pose in these alpine tundra regions. AO1=2

AO2=4

AO1 – Knowledge and understanding of the impact of climate change on

cold environments.

AO2 – Applies knowledge and understanding to the novel situation in

assessing the challenges of climate change on this landscape.

Mark scheme

Level 2 (4–6 marks)

AO1 – Demonstrates clear knowledge and understanding of concepts,

processes, interactions and change.

AO2 – Applies knowledge and understanding to this novel situation

offering clear assessment drawn appropriately from the context provided.

– A-LEVEL GEOGRAPHY – –

Connections and relationships between different aspects of study are

evident with clear relevance.

Level 1 (1–3 marks)

AO1 – Demonstrates basic knowledge and understanding of concepts,

processes, interactions and change.

AO2 – Applies limited knowledge and understanding to the novel

situation offering only basic assessment drawn from the context

provided. Connections and relationships between different aspects of

study are basic with limited relevance.

Notes for answers

AO1

• Physical characteristics of cold environments. Climate, soils and

vegetation (and their interaction).

• Concept of environmental fragility. Human impacts on fragile cold

environments over time and at a variety of scales. Recent and

prospective impact of climate change. Management of cold

environments at present and in alternative possible futures.

• Case study of a contrasting glaciated landscape from beyond the UK

to illustrate and analyse how it presents challenges for human

occupation.

AO2

• The temperature increase will effectively raise the tree line further up

the slope. This means that existing tundra vegetation species will

effectively be outcompeted over time. Those environmental niches

which exist on the upper slopes in the Alps, Pyrenees and Scandes will

be at risk of serious disruption. The Pyrenees, for example, is

expected to see a 74% decline in its tundra with a warming of just 1 °C

which is arguably already occurring.

• Warming further downslope will allow for the introduction of new

species including non-native species well acclimatised to the new

environment. This may lead to new invasive species colonising the

area. Those further affect the ecology and food webs particularly if

virulent pests colonise.

• Spring snowmelt is likely to be reduced. This recharge of freshwater

for the environment downslope will affect both aquatic life and the

supply of freshwater for people dependent on this annual event. HEP

schemes may also experience a detriment.

• Increased slope instability may result in damage to wildlife and greater

risks to people.

• Recreational activities such as skiing will be at risk of collapse in some

traditional locations.

• Assessment may consider scale of challenge or potential severity.

– A-LEVEL GEOGRAPHY – –

Credit any other valid assessment.

04 4 With reference to a glaciated landscape that you have studied, to 20

what extent has erosion been the dominant process shaping the AO1=10

landscape? AO2=10

AO1 – Knowledge and understanding of the processes and landscapes

in glacial environments.

AO2 – Applies knowledge and understanding to show how the processes 27

link directly to the creation of the glaciated landscape.

Notes for answers

AO1

• Geomorphological processes – weathering: frost action, nivation; ice

movement: internal deformation, rotational, compressional, extensional

and basal sliding; erosion: plucking, abrasion; transportation and

deposition.

• Erosional and depositional landforms: corries, arêtes, glacial troughs,

hanging valleys, truncated spurs, roches moutonnées. Characteristic

glaciated landscapes.

• Origin and development of landforms and landscapes of glacial

deposition: drumlins, erratics, moraines, till plains. Characteristic

glaciated landscapes.

• Case study(ies) of glaciated environment(s) at a local scale to illustrate

and analyse fundamental glacial processes, their landscape outcomes

as set out above and engage with field data.

AO2

• The direction of the response will depend on the choice of supporting

material.

• Expect to see some definition of terms such as abrasion and plucking

as these are the main tools of erosion by glaciers.

• These processes combined with the sheer force of the moving ice are

responsible for the formation of a large number of interlinked landforms

such as corries, ridges, pyramidal peaks, glacial troughs hanging

valleys and truncated spurs. Within the valley there is also likely to be

reference to roche moutonnées. All of these are clearly products of

glacial erosion.

• However, during the development of these landforms, more

sophisticated responses should point towards other processes. For

instance, most agree that the corrie starts out as a nivation hollow and

cannot develop into a corrie without ice compression and then

movement under gravity. Processes such as basal sliding, internal

deformation and rotation are therefore essential in forming a corrie and

later, a valley glacier.

• Furthermore, the role of glacial transport and deposition is vital in

explaining a host of other characteristic features of the glaciated

landscape. Drumlins, erratics, moraines and till plains are all formed

by the action of the melting ice as it reaches wa–A-LEVEL GEOGRAPHYrmer temperatu–res in –

either lower lying land or lower latitudes. Expect to see some

reference to the moraine dammed ribbon lakes which are characteristic

28 features of the glaciated valley floor.

• The role of weathering should also be considered not least in the

formation of scree slopes.

• Some may even consider eustatic sea level change and its importance

in shaping the landscapes of the fjords and / or Dalmatian coastlines.

• Whatever the argument there should be some awareness that it is not

just erosion which has led to the formation of these highly distinctive

landscapes. – A-LEVEL GEOGRAPHY – –

Credit any other valid assessment.

Marking grid for Question 04.4

Level/ Criteria/Descriptor

Mark

Range

Level 4 • Detailed evaluative conclusion that is rational and firmly based on knowledge and

(16–20 understanding which is applied to the context of the question (AO2).

marks) • Detailed, coherent and relevant analysis and evaluation in the application of

knowledge and understanding throughout (AO2).

• Full evidence of links between knowledge and understanding to the application of

knowledge and understanding in different contexts (AO2).

• Detailed, highly relevant and appropriate knowledge and understanding of place(s)

and environments used throughout (AO1).

• Full and accurate knowledge and understanding of key concepts and processes

throughout (AO1).

• Detailed awareness of scale and temporal change which is well integrated where

appropriate (AO1).

Level 3 • Clear evaluative conclusion that is based on knowledge and understanding which is

(11–15 applied to the context of the question (AO2).

marks) • Generally clear, coherent and relevant analysis and evaluation in the application of

knowledge and understanding (AO2).

• Generally clear evidence of links between knowledge and understanding to the

application of knowledge and understanding in different contexts (AO2).

• Generally clear and relevant knowledge and understanding of place(s) and

environments (AO1).

• Generally clear and accurate knowledge and understanding of key concepts and

processes (AO1).

• Generally clear awareness of scale and temporal change which is integrated where

appropriate (AO1).

Level 2 • Some sense of an evaluative conclusion partially based upon knowledge and

(6–10 understanding which is applied to the context of the question (AO2).

marks) • Some partially relevant analysis and evaluation in the application of knowledge and

understanding (AO2).

• Some evidence of links between knowledge and understanding to the application of

knowledge and understanding in different contexts (AO2).

• Some relevant knowledge and understanding of place(s) and environments which is

partially relevant (AO1).

• Some knowledge and understanding of key concepts, processes and interactions and

change (AO1).

• Some awareness of scale and temporal change which is sometimes integrated where

appropriate. There may be a few inaccuracies (AO1).

Level 1 • Very limited and/or unsupported evaluative conclusion that is loosely based upon

(1–5 knowledge and understanding which is applied to the context of the question (AO2). 29

marks) • Very limited analysis and evaluation in the application of knowledge and

understanding. This lacks clarity and coherence (AO2).

• Very limited and rarely logical evidence of links between knowledge and understanding

to the application of knowledge and understanding in different contexts (AO2).

• Very limited relevant knowledge and understanding of place(s) and environments

(AO1).

• Isolated knowledge and understanding of key concepts and processes (AO1).

• Very limited awareness of scale and temporal change which is rarely integrated where

appropriate. There may be a number of inaccuracies (AO1).

Level 0 • Nothing worthy of credit.

(0 marks)

How to answer it

AQA A-Level Geography: Glacial Systems & Landscapes Master Guide

📌 Assessment Overview

What This Question Tests

This full exam question covers key components of Section B (Glacial Systems and Landscapes):

  • Periglacial Geomorphology (AO1): Physical mass-movement mechanisms producing solifluction lobes (active layer thawing, frost heave, gravity, and gradient change).
  • Quantitative Data Analysis (AO3): Extracting trends, contrasting spatial datasets (interior vs northern Alaska), calculating rates of change, and spotting anomalies in permafrost temperatures.
  • Climate Vulnerability Assessment (AO1 & AO2): Synthesising stimulus material (Figure 8) and theoretical knowledge to evaluate physical, ecological, and economic risks to alpine tundra.
  • Synoptic Landscape Evaluation (AO1 & AO2): Constructing a sustained 20-mark evaluative essay assessing the relative dominance of glacial erosion against deposition, fluvioglacial, and periglacial processes in a named case study landscape.
Question 04.1 • 4 Marks (AO1)

Solifluction Lobe Formation Processes

Outline processes which lead to the formation of solifluction lobes.

✅ Step-by-Step Mark Scheme Breakdown

  1. Thermal Melting: During brief summer months, temperatures rise above 0 °C, thawing the upper active layer of permafrost. The impermeable permafrost below prevents vertical drainage, causing complete saturation.
  2. Frost Heave Contribution: Diurnal freeze-thaw cycles cause ground water to expand by ~9%, heaving soil particles perpendicularly upwards; on melting, they settle vertically downslope.
  3. Gravitational Flow: The saturated active layer loses internal cohesion and internal friction, causing it to flow slowly downslope over the frozen permafrost under gravity (even on slopes as low as 1°–2°).
  4. Lobe Deposition: When gradient slackens or the front dries/refreezes, velocity drops; trailing saturated sediment builds up behind, forming a tongue-shaped lobe.

🧠 Exam Technique & Examiner Tip

  • Point-Marked Question: 1 mark per valid point, with extra marks for development ( d ). Award up to 4 marks.
  • Mark Scheme Constraint: "Max 3 if only one process is considered." You must explicitly reference both thawing/solifluction flow and frost heave / freeze-thaw or slope dynamics to reach full 4/4.
  • Use precise geomorphic vocabulary: Always write active layer, impermeable permafrost table, loss of shear strength, and lobate tongue/terracette.

❌ Common Misconceptions to Avoid

  • Confusing with mudflows or landslides: Solifluction is extremely slow (millimetres to centimetres per year), not a rapid catastrophic slope failure.
  • Forgetting the impermeable layer: Water does not drain away because the permafrost underneath remains permanently frozen year-round. Omitting this omits the core causal mechanism of high pore water pressure.
Mark Allocation: 4 marks total. 1 mark for each valid step + 1 for each developed detail (e.g. slopes as low as 1°, water cannot infiltrate impermeable permafrost, front decelerates forming ridge/lobe).
Question 04.2 • 6 Marks (AO3)

Data Analysis: Alaska Permafrost Temperatures (1978–2020)

Analyse the data shown in Figure 7.

💡 Key Trends & Comparative Findings

  • Overall Trend: Both interior Alaska and northern Alaska show clear, sustained warming over the 42-year period.
  • Absolute Temperature Disparity: Interior Alaska is warmer overall (ranging roughly from -4.0 °C to -1.0 °C) compared to northern Alaska, which is much colder (ranging from -10.0 °C to -5.0 °C).
  • Warming Magnitude & Rate: Northern Alaska experienced much greater warming. For instance, Deadhorse rose from -8.5 °C to -5.1 °C (+3.4 °C), and West Dock warmed from -10.0 °C (1978) to -7.0 °C (2018), a rise of 3.0 °C. Interior sites (e.g., Old Man) rose by around 1.4 °C (-3.1 °C to -1.7 °C).
  • Anomalies & Variations: Livengood (interior) showed very little discernible variation, remaining stationary near 0.7 °C. Deadhorse displayed notable cooling fluctuations between 1978–1990. Both sets exhibit a plateau/slight cooling between 2000 and 2002.

📐 Step-by-Step Data Manipulation (Essential for Level 2)

  1. Calculate Range & Contrast:
    Interior Alaska temperature envelope = approx. 3.0 °C spread.
    Northern Alaska envelope = approx. 5.0 °C spread (colder and wider variance).
  2. Quantify Change (Deadhorse):
    Final (-5.1 °C) - Initial (-8.5 °C) = +3.4 °C warming.
  3. Quantify Change (West Dock):
    Final (-7.0 °C in 2018) - Initial (-10.0 °C in 1978) = +3.0 °C over 40 years ( 0.075 °C/year ).
  4. Quantify Change (Old Man):
    Final (-1.7 °C) - Initial (-3.1 °C) = +1.4 °C over ~36 years.

🧠 How to Secure Level 2 (4–6 Marks)

The mark scheme explicitly defines two levels:

  • Level 1 (1–3 marks): Basic descriptive points. Simply listing numbers from the graph without calculating differences or making direct comparisons between regions.
  • Level 2 (4–6 marks): Clear analysis of quantitative data with direct manipulation (e.g., calculating differences, percentage/rate changes) and clear connections drawn across both regions, noting general patterns alongside specific anomalies (such as Livengood).
Examiner Insight: Never just lift raw data (e.g. "Deadhorse was -8.5 °C in 1978 and -5.1 °C in 2020"). You must perform a calculation: "representing an overall increase of 3.4 °C over the period."
Question 04.3 • 6 Marks (AO1: 2 | AO2: 4)

Challenges of Climate Change in Alpine Tundra

Using Figure 8 and your own knowledge, assess the challenges that climate change is likely to pose in these alpine tundra regions.

✅ Expected Synthesis (Stimulus + Own Knowledge)

  • Upward Tree-Line Shift (Altitudinal Migration): Warmer temperatures enable forest and shrub species to colonise higher elevations, squeezing out endemic, slow-growing alpine species (74% alpine tundra loss projected in the Pyrenees with just 1 °C warming).
  • Loss of Ecological Niches: Alpine flora/fauna cannot migrate further upward once they reach mountain summits ("mountaintop extinction" trap).
  • Invasive Competitors & Disease: Warmer lowlands encourage competitive lowland generalist species, non-native plants, and virulent insect pests to colonise previously inhospitable alpine zones.
  • Hydrological & Human Pressures: Earlier spring snowmelt depletes the seasonal "water tower" storage effect. This threatens downstream irrigation, freshwater supplies, and Hydroelectric Power (HEP) generation. Winter ski/tourism economies face severe shortening of seasons.
  • Mass Movement Hazards: Thawing mountain permafrost destabilises rock walls and steep scree slopes, increasing rockfall and debris flow risks.

🧠 Structuring an "Assess" Answer

  • Weigh Severity & Scale: Distinguish between immediate local impacts (ski industry financial losses, localized rockfalls) versus irreversible ecological damage (permanent extinction of endemic alpine species across European chains like the Pyrenees, Alps, and Scandes).
  • Explicit Connection: You must combine direct references to Figure 8 (tree-line shifts, temperature thresholds, regional vulnerability) with wider conceptual understanding of fragile cold environments.
Level Descriptor Check: Level 2 (4–6 marks) requires clear knowledge of cold environment processes (AO1) applied directly to assess specific challenges, offering balanced evaluative judgements on scale and severity (AO2).
Question 04.4 • 20 Marks (AO1: 10 | AO2: 10)

20-Mark Evaluative Essay: Dominance of Erosion in Glaciated Landscapes

With reference to a glaciated landscape that you have studied, to what extent has erosion been the dominant process shaping the landscape?

💡 Case Study Framework: English Lake District (or Snowdonia / Cairngorms)

To reach Level 4 (16–20 marks), ground your answer in a specific landscape, naming individual landforms and locations while evaluating glacial erosion against glacial deposition, fluvioglacial activity, and periglacial weathering over geological time.

1. The Case for Erosional Dominance

  • Core Mechanisms: Basal sliding, plucking (quarrying), and abrasion under warm-based valley glaciers driven by internal deformation and rotational slip.
  • Scale & Visual Dominance: Macro-landforms define the physical topography.
    • Corries: e.g., Red Tarn on Helvellyn, hollowed by rotational gouging and nivation hollow enlargement.
    • Arêtes & Pyramidal Peaks: Striding Edge and Helvellyn peak created by back-to-back corrie retreat.
    • Glacial Troughs: Patterdale / Ullswater, formed by truncate spurs and deep U-shaped overdeepening.
    • Micro/Meso Features: Roche moutonnées and striations at St John's in the Vale.

2. The Crucial Role of Deposition & Fluvioglacial

  • Glacial Deposition: Lowland and valley floor topographies are heavily shaped by ice wastage during retreat.
    • Moraines: Lateral and hummocky moraines in Ennerdale and valley floors; recessional moraines damming ribbon lakes.
    • Drumlin Fields: Swarms of subglacial drumlins in the Eden Valley and near Kendal indicating ice movement directions.
    • Erratics: Shap granite erratics transported over 30 km southeast across the Eden Valley.
  • Fluvioglacial Modification: Subglacial meltwater under hydrostatic pressure carved meltwater channels and deposited kames and eskers.

3. Periglacial & Post-Glacial Modifications

  • Freeze-Thaw Weathering: Frost shattering attacking arêtes and cliff faces (e.g., Wastwater screes), continuously modifying the profile of glacial troughs post-glaciation.
  • Mass Movement & Alluvium: Post-glacial rockfalls, solifluction lobes, and alluvial fans deposited by rivers entering lakes (e.g., Keswick town built on an alluvial fan dividing Derwentwater and Bassenthwaite Lake).

🧠 Synthesising an Evaluative Conclusion (AO2)

  • Temporal Perspective: Erosion was dominant during glacial maxima (Devensian stage / Loch Lomond Stadial), but retreat and post-glacial periods are dominated by deposition and subaerial weathering.
  • Spatial Perspective: High-altitude upland zones (summits, corries, upper valleys) are heavily dominated by erosion; low-altitude fringe basins and valley floors are dominated by deposition and glacio-fluvial infill.

❌ What Distinguishes Level 4 (16–20 Marks) from Level 2/3?

  • Generic "textbook" landform lists: Describing how a corrie forms without naming a real-world case study caps you in Level 2. Name real valleys, tarns, and ridges (e.g., Helvellyn range, Langdale).
  • One-sided essays: Candidates who write 4 pages explaining only erosional features cannot access Level 4. You must evaluate deposition, periglacial weathering, and fluvioglacial action as competing/complementary processes.
  • Absence of Process Mechanics: High-scoring scripts explain how ice moves to enable erosion (internal deformation, regelation creep, rotational flow, subglacial water pressure).
Level 4 Band (16–20 marks): Detailed, coherent evaluation with sustained explicit judgement; detailed knowledge of place/environment; comprehensive operational understanding of geomorphological processes, temporal stages, and spatial scale variations.

Topics

3.1 Physical geography · 3.4 Geographical skills checklist · 3.1.4 Glacial systems and landscapes · 3.4.1 Qualitative skills and quantitative skills · 3.4.2 Specific skills

Question and mark scheme from the AQA A-Level Geography examination, Paper 1, June 2025. QuestionVault is an independent revision resource; questions remain the copyright of the awarding body.