AQA A-Level Mathematics Paper 2, June 2025: Question 6
6 marks · Medium difficulty · Multi-step Problem
Use the trapezium rule to approximate the area under the curve y = e^(x/2)/(x - 3) between x = 4 and x = 8, and evaluate a claim about whether the approximation is an under- or overestimate.
Practise this questionQuestion
Question text
6 The curve with equation y = is shown in the diagram.
x – 3
y x
e2
y =
x – 3
O 4 8 x
The region shaded is bounded by the curve, the x‑axis, and the lines x = 4 and x = 8
The trapezium rule with six ordinates (5 strips) is to be used to find an approximate
value for the area of the shaded region.
Some of the values required to obtain this approximation are shown in the table below.
x 4 4.8 5.6 6.4 7.2 8
y 7.3891 6.1240 6.3249 8.7139 10.9196
6 (a) (i) Find the y‑value that is missing from the table.
[1 mark]
6 (a) (ii) Use the trapezium rule with six ordinates (5 strips) to find an approximate value for the
area of the shaded region.
Give your answer to five significant figures.
[3 marks]
(08)
6 (b) A student finds an improved approximation for the area of the shaded region by using
the trapezium rule with 11 ordinates.
The student correctly obtains 29.759 as their improved approximation.
The student claims that the exact area must be greater than 29.759
Without further calculation, explain whether or not the student is correct.
[2 marks]
Mark scheme
Show the mark scheme
Q Marking instructions AO Marks Typical solution
6(a)(i) Obtains AWFW [7.2154, 7.2155] 1.1b B1 7.2155
May be seen in the table
Subtotal 1
6(a)(ii) States or uses h = 0.8 OE 1.1b B1
8 − 4
h =
Substitutes all the given y 1.1a M1 5
values and their answer from 0 8. 7 3891.+10 9196. +
A =
6(a)(i) to achieve 2 2 6 1240(. + 6 3249. + 7 2155. + 8 7139.)
7 3891.+10 9196. +
= 30 026.
2(6 124. + 6 3249. + 7 2155. + 8 7139.)
FT their 7.2155
PI 75.0653
Accept correct exact values or
values to more than 4 decimal
places.
Condone omission of the
bracket after 8.7139
Obtains AWRT 30.026 1.1b A1
Subtotal 3
6(b) States that the curve is convex 2.4 E1 The curve is convex, so the trapezium
or concave upwards rule gives an over-estimate.
Accept concave up Therefore, the student is incorrect.
Or
d2 y
States that 2 > 0
dx
Explains that the trapezium rule 2.4 E1
gives an over-estimate
and
deduces that the student is
incorrect
Subtotal 2
Question 6 Total 6
How to answer it
The Trapezium Rule & Curve Nature
What this question tests
This question assesses your ability to apply numerical integration techniques and critically evaluate approximations:
- Evaluating exponential/rational functions accurately at specified points.
- Applying the Trapezium Rule formula with correct strip width ( h ) and ordinates.
- Rounding to a specified level of accuracy (5 significant figures).
- Understanding curve concavity/convexity ( d²y/dx² > 0 ) and explaining whether an approximation gives an underestimate or overestimate.
Part (a)(i) — Missing Ordinate Value
Calculate the missing y-value in the table when x = 6.4 [1 Mark]
📐 Calculations
The curve has equation y = e^(x/2) / (x − 3) .
- Substitute x = 6.4 :
y = e^(6.4 / 2) / (6.4 − 3) - Simplify numerator and denominator:
y = e^(3.2) / 3.4 - Evaluate:
y = 24.53253... / 3.4 = 7.21545... - Round to match the table (4 decimal places):
y = 7.2155
✅ Correct Answer & Mark Scheme
y = 7.2155 (accept any value in range [7.2154, 7.2155] )
❌ Common Errors
- Premature rounding: Rounding e^(3.2) to 24.5 before dividing, giving 7.2059 (inaccurate).
- Bracket errors on calculator: Typing e^6.4/2/(6.4 - 3) without appropriate grouping.
Part (a)(ii) — Trapezium Rule Approximation
Approximate the shaded area to 5 significant figures using 5 strips [3 Marks]
💡 Key Knowledge
The Trapezium Rule is given by:
Area ≈ (h / 2) × [ y₀ + yₙ + 2(y₁ + y₂ + ... + yₙ₋₁) ]
- Number of strips n = 5
- Number of ordinates n + 1 = 6
- Strip width: h = (b − a) / n = (8 − 4) / 5 = 0.8
📐 Step-by-Step Calculation
- Strip width:
h = (8 − 4) / 5 = 0.8 - Sum the end ordinates (y₀ + y₅):
7.3891 + 10.9196 = 18.3087 - Sum the interior ordinates (y₁ to y₄):
6.1240 + 6.3249 + 7.2155 + 8.7139 = 28.3783 - Combine using formula:
Area ≈ (0.8 / 2) × [ 18.3087 + 2(28.3783) ]
Area ≈ 0.4 × [ 18.3087 + 56.7566 ] = 0.4 × 75.0653
Area ≈ 30.02612 - Round to 5 significant figures:
Area ≈ 30.026
✅ Mark Scheme Breakdown
- B1: Stating or using h = 0.8 (or equivalent).
- M1: Correct substitution of all y-values into the formula:
0.8/2 × [ 7.3891 + 10.9196 + 2(6.1240 + 6.3249 + 7.2155 + 8.7139) ] (follow through their 7.2155). - A1: Final answer of 30.026 (AWRT). Must be 5 significant figures.
❌ Common Errors & Pitfalls
- Incorrect h: Using h = (8 − 4) / 6 = 0.667 by dividing by the number of ordinates instead of the number of strips.
- Ignoring accuracy requirements: Giving 30.03 (4 s.f.) or 30.0 (3 s.f.) loses the final A1 mark.
- Mispairing y-values: Doubling all ordinates or forgetting to multiply interior ordinates by 2.
Part (b) — Evaluation of Approximation (Over/Underestimate)
Explain whether the student's claim that exact area > 29.759 is correct [2 Marks]
💡 Key Mathematical Principle
Whether the trapezium rule overestimates or underestimates depends on the curvature:
- Convex curve (concave upwards / d²y/dx² > 0): The straight line chords connecting points lie above the curve. The trapezium rule produces an over-estimate.
- Concave curve (concave downwards / d²y/dx² < 0): Chords lie below the curve. The rule produces an under-estimate.
🧠 Exam Technique & Structure
To gain both explanation marks, your reasoning must follow a strict two-step deductive chain:
- Describe the shape: State that the curve is convex (or concave upwards, or d²y/dx² > 0 ).
- Deduce and conclude: State that the trapezium rule gives an over-estimate, which means the exact area is less than 29.759. Therefore, the student is incorrect.
✅ Model Answer
The curve is convex (concave upwards). Therefore, the straight chords lie above the curve, so the trapezium rule gives an over-estimate of the true area.
This means the exact area must be less than 29.759. Consequently, the student's claim is incorrect.
[E1] Explaining that the approximation is an over-estimate and concluding the student is incorrect.
❌ Examiner Commentary & Lost Marks
- Saying "increasing": Mentioning that the curve is "increasing" or has a minimum does NOT explain why it over-estimates. The crucial property is convexity/curvature.
- Confusing concave vs convex: Calling it "concave" without specifying "upwards" loses the first mark under AQA conventions.
- Missing the conclusion: Explaining that it is an overestimate but omitting the explicit deduction that "the student is incorrect".
Topics
Pure Mathematics · I: Numerical methods
Question and mark scheme from the AQA A-Level Mathematics examination, Paper 2, June 2025. QuestionVault is an independent revision resource; questions remain the copyright of the awarding body.