AQA AS Level Physics Paper 1, June 2019: Question 3
17 marks · Medium difficulty · Short Answer
Analyze the forces, energy changes, and kinematics of a fairground reverse bungee ride with two stretched elastic ropes and a loaded cage.
Practise this questionQuestion
Question text
03 Figure 3 shows a fairground ride called a ‘reverse bungee’.
Figure 3
Two identical stretched elastic ropes are fixed to a cage with passengers inside. The
loaded cage is held in place by a clamp. When the clamp is released the elastic
ropes accelerate the loaded cage vertically into the air.
P is the point where the rope attaches to the top of the vertical tower.
Q is the point where the rope attaches to the cage. Q is level with the centre of mass
of the loaded cage.
Before release, the tension T in each elastic rope is 3.7 × 104 N and each rope makes
an angle of 20° with the vertical tower.
The total mass M of the loaded cage is 1.2 × 103 kg and the mass of the elastic ropes
is negligible.
03.1 Show that the downward force F exerted by the clamp on the loaded cage is about
6 × 104 N
.
[4 marks]
03.2 Calculate the initial acceleration of the loaded cage when the clamp is released.
[2 marks]
acceleration10 = m s–2
03.3 The unstretched length of each elastic rope is 24 m. The ropes obey Hooke’s Law for
all extensions used in the ride.
The vertical distance between points P and Q on Figure 3 is 35 m.
*09* Show that the total elastic potential energy stored in both ropes before the loaded
cage is released is about 5 × 105 J.
[4 marks]
03.4 The designers of the ride claim that the loaded cage will reach a height of 50 m
above Q.
Deduce whether this claim is justified.
[3 marks]
03.5 The designers also claim that the loaded cage reaches a maximum speed of at least
90 km h−1.
Calculate, in J, the kinetic energy of the loaded cage when it travels at 90 km h−1.
[3 marks]
kinetic energy = J
03.6 Deduce without further calculation whether the maximum speed claim is justified.
[1 mark]
Mark scheme
Show the mark scheme
Question Answers Additional Comments/Guidance Mark
details
Attempt to calculate weight of cage
1.2 103 × 9.81 or 1.18 104
eg × × seen
Attempt to find vertical component of tension TV in one rope
eg 3.7 × 104 cos20 or 3.5 × 104 seen AO2.1b
03.1 4
Uses F = twice their tension – their weight If weight not calculated, allow MP3 for doubling
their tension or their resolved component
5.8 × 104 (N)
Use of F = ma with 6 × 104 N or their 03.1
03.2 2 AO2.1f
50 m s–2) –2
( Allow 48 (m s ).
Calculation of length of rope Allow methods using F=k∆L and E = ½ k∆L2
eg 35/cos20 or 37.2 seen
Calculation of extension of one rope or calculation of total
extension of both ropes
03.3 eg their length–24 or 13.2 or 26.4 seen AO2.1b
Use of E = ½ F∆L
e.g. ½ × 3.7 × 104 × 13.2 = 2.44 × 105 (J)
4.9 × 105 (J)
ID
details
No credit for use of suvat in either method and AO3.1b
MP3 must come from correct Physics.
First method is for calculation of max h and
Use of E lost = ∆Ep
35 comparison with 50 m.
eg 1.2 × 10 × 9.81 × h = 5 × 10
h from their 03.3 if it rounds to 5 × 105
h = 42 (m) Allow
42 < 50 (m), so claim not justified
03.4 3
OR
Second method is for calculation of ∆Ep and
Use of ∆Ep = mg∆h with 50 m comparison with E.
1.2 × 103 × 9.81 × 50
eg
∆E = 5.9 × 105 (J)
p
5.9 × 105 5 × 105
> , so claim not justified
90 km h–1 = 25 m s–1 The conversion mark stands alone. 1 AO1.1b
E = ½ mv2
Use of k
03.5 3 2
eg ½ × 1.2 × 10 × (their v) 2
3.8 × 105 (J) ecf for their v
If their E > 5 × 105, claim is unjustified
8 k AO3.1b
OR
03.6 1
E < 5 × 105, claim may be justified depending on gain
If their k
in Ep or losses due to resistive forces
Total 17
How to answer it
Reverse Bungee Ride Analysis
What this question tests
This comprehensive multi-part problem assesses core mechanics principles including resolution of forces (trigonometry), Newton's second law ( F = ma ), gravitational potential energy ( E_p = mg\Delta h ), Hooke's Law, elastic strain energy ( E = 0.5 F\Delta L ), and unit conversions. It heavily tests your ability to link stored energy to dynamic motion and critically evaluate engineering claims.
Part 03.1: Downward Force Exerted by the Clamp
✅ Correct Answer
Weight = 1.2 × 10³ kg × 9.81 m s⁻² = 1.18 × 10⁴ N
Vertical tension component (per rope) = 3.7 × 10⁴ cos(20°) = 3.48 × 10⁴ N
Total downward force F = 2(3.48 × 10⁴) - 1.18 × 10⁴ = 5.8 × 10⁴ N (shown)
💡 Key Knowledge
- Forces in equilibrium: The clamp holds the cage stationary against opposing forces.
- Resolving vectors: Use T cos(\theta) to find the vertical component aligned with the tower.
- Multiplying by 2 accounts for the two identical symmetric elastic ropes.
🧠 Exam Technique
This is a "show that" question. You must state your intermediate values clearly (weight and vertical tension component) to secure all marking points before arriving at the target figure of 6 × 10⁴ N .
❌ Common Errors
- Using sin(20°) instead of cos(20°) by confusing the angle given with the horizontal.
- Forgetting to multiply the single rope's vertical tension component by 2.
Part 03.2: Initial Acceleration of the Cage
✅ Correct Answer
Acceleration a = 50 m s⁻² (accept 48 m s⁻² if unrounded previous values are carried forward).
📐 Step-by-Step Calculation
- Recall Newton's Second Law: F = ma .
- Rearrange for acceleration: a = F / m .
- Substitute values: a = (5.8 × 10⁴ N) / (1.2 × 10³ kg) .
- Evaluate: 48.33... m s⁻² → round appropriately to 50 m s⁻² .
❌ Common Errors
Dividing mass by force instead of force by mass, leading to dimensionally incorrect fractions.
Part 03.3: Total Elastic Potential Energy Stored
✅ Correct Answer
Total stored elastic potential energy = 4.9 × 10⁵ J (to be compared with the statement "about 5 × 10⁵ J ").
📐 Step-by-Step Calculation
- Find stretched length of one rope using trigonometry: L = 35 / cos(20°) = 37.2 m .
- Calculate extension ( \Delta L ): 37.2 m - 24 m = 13.2 m .
- Apply elastic potential energy formula for one rope ( E = 0.5 F \Delta L ): 0.5 × (3.7 × 10⁴ N) × 13.2 m = 2.44 × 10⁵ J .
- Multiply by 2 for both ropes: 2 × (2.44 × 10⁵ J) = 4.88 × 10⁵ J ≈ 4.9 × 10⁵ J .
🧠 Exam Technique
Alternative methods using E = 0.5 k (\Delta L)² are fully accepted if spring constants are derived correctly first. Always double-check geometric lengths before calculating extensions.
Part 03.4: Evaluating the Height Claim
✅ Correct Answer
The claim is not justified. Maximum height reached above Q is 42 m (which is less than the claimed 50 m ).
💡 Key Knowledge
Conservation of Energy: Assuming no thermal losses, all elastic potential energy stored in the ropes converts entirely into gravitational potential energy ( E_{p(stored)} = mg\Delta h ).
📐 Verification Method
- Equate energy: 4.9 × 10⁵ J = (1.2 × 10³ kg) × 9.81 m s⁻² × h .
- Solve for h : h = (4.9 × 10⁵) / (1.2 × 10³ × 9.81) = 41.6 m ≈ 42 m .
- Compare: 42 m < 50 m , proving the claim is false.
❌ Common Errors
Attempting to use SUVAT equations. SUVAT assumes constant acceleration, but acceleration here varies continuously as tension changes with extension. Examiners award zero credit for kinematic equations in this context.
Part 03.5: Kinetic Energy at Maximum Speed Claim
✅ Correct Answer
Kinetic energy = 3.8 × 10⁵ J (or 3.75 × 10⁵ J depending on rounding).
📐 Step-by-Step Calculation
- Convert speed from km h⁻¹ to m s⁻¹ : 90 / 3.6 = 25 m s⁻¹ .
- State kinetic energy formula: E_k = 0.5 m v² .
- Substitute values: 0.5 × (1.2 × 10³ kg) × (25 m s⁻¹)² .
- Evaluate: 0.5 × 1200 × 625 = 3.75 × 10⁵ J ≈ 3.8 × 10⁵ J .
❌ Common Errors
Forgetting to convert km h⁻¹ into m s⁻¹ before squaring, resulting in wildly incorrect magnitudes.
Part 03.6: Evaluating Speed Claim Validity
✅ Correct Answer
The claim is justified because the calculated kinetic energy ( 3.8 × 10⁵ J ) is less than the total available stored elastic energy ( 4.9 × 10⁵ J ).
💡 Key Knowledge
Energy budgeting: The kinetic energy at any point plus gravitational potential energy gained cannot exceed the initial elastic potential energy provided by the ropes, minus any resistive thermal losses.
🧠 Exam Technique
This is a quick 1-mark follow-on. Look back at your figures from 03.3 ( ≈ 5 × 10⁵ J available) and 03.5 ( 3.8 × 10⁵ J required for that speed). Since required E_k is less than total energy, the speed is entirely achievable.
Topics
Physics · 3.4 Mechanics and materials
Question and mark scheme from the AQA AS Level Physics examination, Paper 1, June 2019. QuestionVault is an independent revision resource; questions remain the copyright of the awarding body.