AQA GCSE Biology Biology Paper 1 (Foundation), June 2024: Question 3

10 marks · Low Demand difficulty · Short Answer

Describe trends in measles cases and vaccination rates from graphs, and evaluate the validity of scientific claims regarding vaccine safety.

Practise this question

Question

Question 3 presents a matching exercise pairing blood components (Platelets and White blood cells) with their functions. Below this, Figure 3 features two graphs plotted from 1940 to 2010: the upper graph shows the percentage of children vaccinated against year, and the lower graph plots the number of people with measles in thousands against year. Subsequent question parts ask candidates to identify when the vaccine was first used, describe the measles trend from 1945 to 1975, evaluate the impact of a 1998 scientific paper, and answer questions regarding peer review and experimental bias.
Question text

03 Measles is caused by a virus.

03.1 The measles vaccine is given to children to prevent them becoming ill with measles.

Draw one line from each blood component to its function when someone is

vaccinated against measles.

[2 marks]

Blood component Function

Help clot the blood where the vaccine was injected

Platelets

Produce antibodies to the measles virus

Produce the measles skin rash

White blood cells

12Transport oxygen to the measles virus

Figure 3 shows information about trends in the UK for:

• percentage of children vaccinated

• the number of people with measles.

Figure 3

03.2 What year was the measles vaccine first used?

Use Figure 3.

[1 mark]

03.3 Describe the trend in the number of people with measles from 1945 to 1975.

*12* Use Figure 3.

[3 marks]

In 1998, a scientific paper was published suggesting a link between condition X and

one type of measles vaccine.

03.4 What happened to the percentage of children vaccinated against measles after the

scientific paper was published in 1998?

Use Figure 3.

[1 mark]

03.5 Why might the claims made in the scientific paper have affected the percentage of

children vaccinated?

[1 mark]

Tick ( ) one box.

The measles pathogen did not exist in the UK anymore.

Parents were worried their children would get condition X.

The health service in the UK did not have any vaccines.

03.6 In 2010, the scientific paper linking condition X and the measles vaccine was shown

to be based on false claims.

What should scientists do with scientific research to help detect false claims?

[1 mark]

Tick ( ) one box.

Have the research peer reviewed.

Publish the research on the internet.

Send a research questionnaire to the public.

03.7 The person who wrote the scientific paper was paid to research the link between

condition X and the measles vaccine.

Why are the claims in the scientific paper likely to be considered not valid?

[1 mark]

Mark scheme

Show the mark scheme The mark scheme allocates 10 marks across questions 03.1 to 03.7. Question 03.1 awards 1 mark for matching Platelets to clot blood and 1 mark for White blood cells to produce antibodies. Question 03.2 awards 1 mark for 1968 (allow 1969). Question 03.3 awards 3 marks for: increases, levels off/plateaus, then decreases. Question 03.4 awards 1 mark for percentage decreased. Question 03.5 awards 1 mark for parents being worried about condition X. Question 03.6 awards 1 mark for peer review. Question 03.7 awards 1 mark for identifying bias, financial influence, or insufficient sample/evidence.

Question 3

AO /

Question Answers Mark

Spec Ref.

03.1 AO2

4.3.1.7

4.3.1.6

4.2.2.3

do not accept more than one line from a box on the left

AO /

Question Answers Extra information Mark

Spec Ref.

03.2 1968 allow 1969 1 AO3

4.3.1.2

4.3.1.7

AO /

Spec Ref.

03.3 increases 1 AO3

4.3.1.2

(then) levels off / plateaus allow (then) stays the same 1

allow reaches a maximum

between 1956 and 1968

(then) decreases 1

ignore use of numbers of people

MARKif no other mark awarded allowSCHEME–– –

1 mark for (overall) decrease

AO /

Spec Ref.

03.4 (the percentage) decreased allow (the percentage) 1 AO3

decreased then increased 4.3.1.2

allow (the percentage) changed 4.3.1.7

from 92% to 80%

AO /

Spec Ref.

03.5 parents were worried their 1 AO3

children would get condition X 4.3.1.2

4.3.1.7

AO /

Spec Ref.

03.6 have the research peer 1 AO2

reviewed 4.3.1.9

AO /

Spec Ref.

03.7 any one from: 1 AO3

• (the author was) biased 4.3.1.9

• (the author was) influenced ignore (the author) was paid

by money

• because the research was

not peer reviewed

• there was not enough

evidence

• small sample size

Total Question 3 10

How to answer it

Measles, Vaccination Trends and Scientific Integrity

📌 What This Question Tests

This question evaluates core biology knowledge and essential "Working Scientifically" skills:

  • Immune System & Blood Components: The specific roles of white blood cells and platelets following an injection.
  • Interpreting Epidemiological Graphs: Reading axes accurately, identifying start points, and describing complex trends across set time intervals.
  • How Science Works in Society: Understanding peer review, conflict of interest, and why scientific bias undermines validity.
Question 03.1 • 2 Marks

Matching Blood Components to Their Functions

Blood components involved during vaccination

✅ Correct Matches

  • Platelets → Help clot the blood where the vaccine was injected [1 mark]
  • White blood cells → Produce antibodies to the measles virus [1 mark]

💡 Key Knowledge

  • Platelets are cell fragments that trigger blood clotting at wound sites to prevent excessive bleeding and microbe entry.
  • Lymphocytes (white blood cells) recognise foreign antigens on the weakened/dead virus and produce specific antibodies.

❌ Common Errors & Mark Scheme Rule

The rubric strictly specifies: "Do not accept more than one line from a box on the left." If you draw two lines from "White blood cells", you automatically forfeit that mark.

Question 03.2 • 1 Mark

Reading Graphs: When Was the Vaccine First Used?

Interpreting the introduction date from percentage data

✅ Correct Answer

1968 (allow 1969) [1 mark]

🧠 Exam Technique

Look at the top graph ("Percentage of children vaccinated"). Trace along the baseline (0%) until the curve leaves zero and starts to rise steeply. Each major grid square covers 10 years, meaning each small square represents 1 year. The line starts rising just before 1970, at 1968.

Question 03.3 • 3 Marks

Describing a Trend (1945 to 1975)

Describing multi-stage changes over a defined time period

✅ Full Mark Scheme Breakdown (3 Marks)

  1. Increases (from 1945 to ~1956) [1 mark]
  2. Levels off / plateaus / stays the same (between ~1956 and 1968) [1 mark]
  3. Decreases (from ~1968 to 1975) [1 mark]

🧠 How to Structure a 3-Mark Trend Question

Whenever a trend question is worth 3 marks, the line almost always has three distinct stages:

  • Stage 1: Goes up
  • Stage 2: Remains constant / reaches a plateau
  • Stage 3: Goes down

❌ Examiner Trap: Quoting Numbers Instead of Trends

The mark scheme notes: "ignore use of numbers of people". Simply listing data points (e.g., "in 1945 it was 330, then in 1960 it was 490") without using words like increases, plateaus, or decreases does not describe the trend and gains 0 marks!

Questions 03.4 & 03.5 • 2 Marks Total

The Effect of the 1998 Paper on Vaccination Uptake

✅ 03.4: Vaccination Trend After 1998 [1 mark]

(The percentage) decreased

Also allowed: "decreased then increased" OR "changed from 92% to 80%".

✅ 03.5: Reason for the Drop [1 mark]

Tick option 2:

☑ Parents were worried their children would get condition X.

💡 Real-World Science Context

This question references the infamous 1998 Wakefield paper which falsely linked the MMR vaccine to autism ("Condition X"). Media coverage led to widespread panic, dropping vaccination rates below the threshold required for herd immunity.

Questions 03.6 & 03.7 • 2 Marks Total

Working Scientifically: Peer Review & Research Bias

✅ 03.6: Detecting False Claims [1 mark]

Tick option 1:

☑ Have the research peer reviewed.

✅ 03.7: Why Paid Research May Not Be Valid [1 mark]

Give any one of the following accepted points:

  • The author was biased
  • The author was influenced by money / financial gain
  • The research was not peer reviewed
  • There was not enough evidence / small sample size

💡 What is Peer Review?

Before scientific research is published in a reputable journal, it must be independently checked and critiqued by other scientists (peers) working in the same field. They check for errors, flawed methodology, and unfair bias.

❌ Common Error: Repeating the Question Stem

In 03.7, students often write: "Because he was paid."
Examiners strictly ignore this because it simply repeats what the question already told you. You must explain the consequence of being paid: bias or a conflict of interest.

Topics

Biology · B2: Organisation · B3: Infection and Response

Question and mark scheme from the AQA GCSE Biology examination, Biology Paper 1 (Foundation), June 2024. QuestionVault is an independent revision resource; questions remain the copyright of the awarding body.