AQA GCSE Combined Science: Trilogy Biology Paper 2 (Higher), 2023: Question 3

12 marks · Standard Demand difficulty · Short Answer

Describe how to investigate the effect of distance from a river on plant species diversity, interpret the results, identify an abiotic factor, and explain the environmental implications of increasing cow numbers.

Practise this question

Question

The question shows Figure 1, a simple map of a field with a river running diagonally across the top and right side, and a note that the figure is next to a field. Question 03.1 asks for a method to investigate how distance from the river affects the number of different plant species in the field, and says to explain how to use a transect. Question 03.2 shows Figure 2, a graph of number of different plant species against distance from the river in metres, with points plotted at 1 to 6 metres and vertical bars showing minimum, mean and maximum values for each distance; it asks which statement the data shows and gives three tick-box options. Question 03.3 asks which abiotic factor could affect the number of different plant species near the river and gives four tick-box options: microorganisms near the roots, moisture levels in the soil, oxygen concentration in the air, and primary consumers in the field. Question 03.4 asks for an explanation of the environmental implications of increasing numbers of cows being farmed across the world, with six marks available and lined answer space.
Question text

03 Figure 1 shows a river next to a field.

Figure 1

03.1 Describe a method to investigate how the distance from the river affects the number

of different plant species in the field.

You should explain how to use a transect in your method.

[4 marks]

03.2 Students used a valid method to investigate how the distance from the river affects

the number of different plant species in the field.

Figure 2 shows the results.

Figure 2

What is shown by the data in Figure 2?

[1 mark]

Tick ( ) one box.

Fewer different species are always recorded nearer to the river.

The mean value students can be most certain about is 5 metres from

the river.

The number of species recorded 6 metres from the river is anomalous.10

Cows walk on the ground near the river more than they walk on the ground further

from the river.

03.3 Which is an abiotic factor that could affect the number of different plant species found

*09* near the river?

[1 mark]

Tick ( ) one box.

Microorganisms near the roots

Moisture levels in the soil

Oxygen concentration in the air

Primary consumers in the field 11

03.4 Increasing numbers of cows are being farmed across the world.

Explain the environmental implications of increasing numbers of cows being farmed.

[6 marks]

Mark scheme

Show the mark scheme The mark scheme states for 03.1 that students should measure or place a string, transect, or line at right angles to the river edge, place quadrats at intervals along the transect, count the different plant species in each quadrat at each distance, and repeat for two more transects. For 03.2, the correct answer is that the mean value students can be most certain about is 5 metres from the river. For 03.3, the correct answer is moisture levels in the soil. For 03.4, the mark scheme gives a level-based response: relevant causes and consequences such as fewer plants due to trampling or grazing, less photosynthesis, more carbon dioxide and methane from cows, deforestation for farmland, and faeces entering watercourses, linked to environmental impacts like greenhouse warming, biodiversity loss, and reduced land for crops.

Question 3

AO /

Question Answers Extra information Mark

Spec. Ref.

03.1 measure / string / transect / line allow measure / string 1 AO1

at right angles to river (edge) perpendicular to river (edge)

allow shown on Figure 1

allow measure / string / transect

/ line straight from the river into

the field

ignore measure / string /

transect / line from the river into

the field unqualified

place quadrat at intervals (along allow place quadrat at named 1 AO1

transect) intervals (of between 1 m and

10 m)

allow place quadrats along

transect

do not accept place quadrat at

random intervals

count the (different plant) ignore references to counting 1 AO1

species (in each quadrat) at numbers of plants or

each distance percentage cover

repeat for 2 more transects allow 2 or more repeats (of 1 AO1

transect)

allow repeat at 2 or more

locations (along the river) 4.7.2.1

allow 3 or more correct transect RPA7

lines shown on Figure 1

AO /

Spec. Ref.

03.2 the mean value students can be 1 AO3

most certain about is 5 metres 4.7.2.1

from the river RPA7

AO /

12 Question Answers Extra information Mark

Spec. Ref.

03.3 moisture levels in the soil 1 AO1

4.7.1.2

4.7.1.1

AO /

Question Answers Mark

Spec. Ref.

Level 3: Relevant points (reasons / causes) are identified, given in

03.4 detail and logically linked to form a clear account. 5–6 AO2

Level 2: Relevant points (reasons / causes) are identified, and 3–4 AO1

there are attempts at logical linking. The resulting account is not

fully clear.

Level 1: Points are identified and stated simply, but their relevance 1–2 AO1

is not clear and there is no attempt at logical linking.

No relevant content. 0

Indicative content

4.7.1.3

4.7.2.1

consequences of increasing number of cows 4.7.2.2

• fewer plants 4.7.3.4

• due to more trampling 4.7.3.5

• due to more plants being eaten (by cows) 4.7.3.2

• (fewer plants so) less photosynthesis

• so more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere

• (more) cows will release carbon dioxide

• from respiration

• (more) cows release methane

• deforestation to provide farmland

• more (cow) faeces entering river / streams / watercourses

environmental implications

o carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas

o methane is a greenhouse gas

o global warming may be greater

o description of consequence(s) of global warming

o description of consequence(s) of (cow) faeces entering river /

streams / watercourses

o less land available to grow crops

o effects of deforestation (eg reduced biodiversity)

For Level 3, explanations include consequence(s) and linked

environmental implication(s).

Total Question 3 12

How to answer it

River Transect, Data Interpretation and Cow Farming

What this question tests

This question tests how to plan a field investigation using a transect and quadrats, how to interpret mean/range data on a graph, how to identify an abiotic factor, and how to explain environmental effects of increased cow farming using clear linked causes and consequences.

Question 03.1

Part (a): Investigating distance from the river

Describe a method using a transect

✅ Correct answer

  • Lay a line transect from the edge of the river at right angles to the river.
  • Place a quadrat at set intervals along the transect.
  • At each quadrat, count the number of different plant species.
  • Repeat with 2 more transects at different places and compare results / calculate a mean.
4 marks: one mark for each correct method point.

💡 Key knowledge

  • A transect is used to study changes across an area.
  • A transect should go perpendicular (at right angles) to the river so distance from the river changes fairly.
  • A quadrat is used to sample plants in a small area.
  • The question asks for number of different species, not total number of plants.

🧠 Exam technique

For full marks, your method must include:

  • Where the transect goes
  • How quadrats are used
  • What is counted
  • Repeats for reliability

Best exam wording: at regular intervals , at right angles to the river , count different species .

❌ Common errors

  • Saying the transect just goes “from the river into the field” without saying at right angles.
  • Placing quadrats at random intervals. The mark scheme wants intervals along the transect.
  • Counting the number of plants instead of the number of different species.
  • Forgetting repeats. Repeats help make the results more reliable.

Model 4-mark answer:

Place a tape measure or line transect from the edge of the river into the field at right angles to the river. Put a quadrat at regular intervals along the transect, for example every 1 m. In each quadrat, count the number of different plant species. Repeat this using two more transects at different points along the river and compare the results or calculate a mean.

Question 03.2

Part (b): Interpreting Figure 2

What is shown by the data?

✅ Correct answer

The mean value students can be most certain about is 5 metres from the river.

1 mark

💡 Key knowledge

  • The graph shows maximum, mean and minimum.
  • You are most certain about a mean where the spread/range is smallest.
  • At 5 m, the difference between maximum and minimum is the smallest, so results are most consistent there.

🧠 Exam technique

When asked what a graph shows, check the error bars or spread:

  • Small spread = more consistency
  • Large spread = less certainty

This is not asking for the highest mean. It is asking where the mean is most certain.

❌ Common errors

  • Choosing 6 m because it has a high mean. High mean does not mean high certainty.
  • Saying fewer species are always recorded nearer the river. The graph does not prove “always”.
  • Calling the 6 m result anomalous when it fits the general pattern.
Question 03.3

Part (c): Abiotic factor

Which abiotic factor could affect plant species near the river?

✅ Correct answer

Moisture levels in the soil

1 mark

💡 Key knowledge

  • Abiotic means non-living factors.
  • Examples include light intensity, temperature, soil pH, mineral content, and soil moisture.
  • Near a river, soil is often wetter, so moisture is a sensible factor affecting which plants grow there.

🧠 Exam technique

If you see a multiple-choice question on abiotic factors, quickly sort options into:

  • Living = biotic
  • Non-living = abiotic

Only one option here is clearly a non-living environmental condition.

❌ Common errors

  • Microorganisms near the roots are living, so biotic.
  • Primary consumers are living, so biotic.
  • Oxygen concentration in the air is abiotic, but it is not the factor identified by the mark scheme for this river question.
Question 03.4

Part (d): Environmental implications of increasing cow farming

6-mark extended response

✅ What a top-level answer includes

  • More cows eat and trample more plants, so there are fewer plants.
  • With fewer plants, there is less photosynthesis.
  • Less photosynthesis means less CO₂ removed from the atmosphere.
  • More cows also release CO₂ by respiration.
  • Cows release methane, which is a greenhouse gas.
  • This can increase the greenhouse effect / global warming.
  • Land may be cleared for grazing, causing deforestation and reduced biodiversity.
  • More cow faeces may enter rivers, causing water pollution and harming aquatic organisms.

💡 Key knowledge

  • Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas.
  • Methane is also a greenhouse gas.
  • Deforestation can reduce habitats and therefore biodiversity.
  • Animal waste entering water can cause pollution and damage ecosystems.

🧠 Exam technique

To reach Level 3 (5–6 marks), do more than list points. You must link cause and effect.

Strong chain style:

more cows → more grazing/trampling → fewer plants → less photosynthesis → more CO₂ in atmosphere → greater global warming

Try to give two or three linked chains rather than lots of separate bullet points.

❌ Common errors

  • Only saying “it is bad for the environment” with no explanation.
  • Listing methane or CO₂ without saying they are greenhouse gases or what this leads to.
  • Not linking cow numbers to a consequence, for example less biodiversity or more global warming.
  • Writing only about farming benefits. The question asks for environmental implications.

Mark breakdown

  • Level 3 (5–6 marks): Relevant points are identified, given in detail and logically linked to form a clear account.
  • Level 2 (3–4 marks): Relevant points are identified, with some attempt at logical linking, but the account is not fully clear.
  • Level 1 (1–2 marks): Simple points are stated, but relevance is limited and there is little or no linking.

Model 6-mark answer:

Increasing numbers of cows can reduce the number of plants because more plants are eaten and more are trampled. This means there is less photosynthesis, so less carbon dioxide is removed from the atmosphere. Cows also release carbon dioxide by respiration, and they release methane. Carbon dioxide and methane are greenhouse gases, so increasing cow numbers can increase the greenhouse effect and cause more global warming.

More land may also be cleared to make farmland for cows, which can cause deforestation. This destroys habitats and reduces biodiversity. In addition, more cow faeces can enter rivers and streams, causing pollution and harming organisms living in the water.

Quick examiner insight for the whole question

What gained marks

  • Using the exact practical terms transect and quadrat.
  • Recognising that certainty in graph data depends on small spread.
  • Knowing that soil moisture is an abiotic factor near a river.
  • Writing a 6-mark response with clear linked environmental consequences.

Where students lost marks

  • Describing random sampling instead of a proper transect method.
  • Counting plant numbers or percentage cover instead of different species.
  • Choosing graph answers based only on the mean, not the spread.
  • Giving unlinked points in the final question instead of explained chains.

Topics

Biology · B7: Ecology · Biology Required Practicals

Question and mark scheme from the AQA GCSE Combined Science: Trilogy examination, Biology Paper 2 (Higher), 2023. QuestionVault is an independent revision resource; questions remain the copyright of the awarding body.