AQA GCSE Combined Science: Trilogy Biology Paper 2 (Higher), 2023: Question 3
12 marks · Standard Demand difficulty · Short Answer
Describe how to investigate the effect of distance from a river on plant species diversity, interpret the results, identify an abiotic factor, and explain the environmental implications of increasing cow numbers.
Practise this questionQuestion
Question text
03 Figure 1 shows a river next to a field.
Figure 1
03.1 Describe a method to investigate how the distance from the river affects the number
of different plant species in the field.
You should explain how to use a transect in your method.
[4 marks]
03.2 Students used a valid method to investigate how the distance from the river affects
the number of different plant species in the field.
Figure 2 shows the results.
Figure 2
What is shown by the data in Figure 2?
[1 mark]
Tick ( ) one box.
Fewer different species are always recorded nearer to the river.
The mean value students can be most certain about is 5 metres from
the river.
The number of species recorded 6 metres from the river is anomalous.10
Cows walk on the ground near the river more than they walk on the ground further
from the river.
03.3 Which is an abiotic factor that could affect the number of different plant species found
*09* near the river?
[1 mark]
Tick ( ) one box.
Microorganisms near the roots
Moisture levels in the soil
Oxygen concentration in the air
Primary consumers in the field 11
03.4 Increasing numbers of cows are being farmed across the world.
Explain the environmental implications of increasing numbers of cows being farmed.
[6 marks]
Mark scheme
Show the mark scheme
Question 3
AO /
Question Answers Extra information Mark
Spec. Ref.
03.1 measure / string / transect / line allow measure / string 1 AO1
at right angles to river (edge) perpendicular to river (edge)
allow shown on Figure 1
allow measure / string / transect
/ line straight from the river into
the field
ignore measure / string /
transect / line from the river into
the field unqualified
place quadrat at intervals (along allow place quadrat at named 1 AO1
transect) intervals (of between 1 m and
10 m)
allow place quadrats along
transect
do not accept place quadrat at
random intervals
count the (different plant) ignore references to counting 1 AO1
species (in each quadrat) at numbers of plants or
each distance percentage cover
repeat for 2 more transects allow 2 or more repeats (of 1 AO1
transect)
allow repeat at 2 or more
locations (along the river) 4.7.2.1
allow 3 or more correct transect RPA7
lines shown on Figure 1
AO /
Spec. Ref.
03.2 the mean value students can be 1 AO3
most certain about is 5 metres 4.7.2.1
from the river RPA7
AO /
12 Question Answers Extra information Mark
Spec. Ref.
03.3 moisture levels in the soil 1 AO1
4.7.1.2
4.7.1.1
AO /
Question Answers Mark
Spec. Ref.
Level 3: Relevant points (reasons / causes) are identified, given in
03.4 detail and logically linked to form a clear account. 5–6 AO2
Level 2: Relevant points (reasons / causes) are identified, and 3–4 AO1
there are attempts at logical linking. The resulting account is not
fully clear.
Level 1: Points are identified and stated simply, but their relevance 1–2 AO1
is not clear and there is no attempt at logical linking.
No relevant content. 0
Indicative content
4.7.1.3
4.7.2.1
consequences of increasing number of cows 4.7.2.2
• fewer plants 4.7.3.4
• due to more trampling 4.7.3.5
• due to more plants being eaten (by cows) 4.7.3.2
• (fewer plants so) less photosynthesis
• so more carbon dioxide in the atmosphere
• (more) cows will release carbon dioxide
• from respiration
• (more) cows release methane
• deforestation to provide farmland
• more (cow) faeces entering river / streams / watercourses
environmental implications
o carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas
o methane is a greenhouse gas
o global warming may be greater
o description of consequence(s) of global warming
o description of consequence(s) of (cow) faeces entering river /
streams / watercourses
o less land available to grow crops
o effects of deforestation (eg reduced biodiversity)
For Level 3, explanations include consequence(s) and linked
environmental implication(s).
Total Question 3 12
How to answer it
River Transect, Data Interpretation and Cow Farming
What this question tests
This question tests how to plan a field investigation using a transect and quadrats, how to interpret mean/range data on a graph, how to identify an abiotic factor, and how to explain environmental effects of increased cow farming using clear linked causes and consequences.
Part (a): Investigating distance from the river
Describe a method using a transect
✅ Correct answer
- Lay a line transect from the edge of the river at right angles to the river.
- Place a quadrat at set intervals along the transect.
- At each quadrat, count the number of different plant species.
- Repeat with 2 more transects at different places and compare results / calculate a mean.
💡 Key knowledge
- A transect is used to study changes across an area.
- A transect should go perpendicular (at right angles) to the river so distance from the river changes fairly.
- A quadrat is used to sample plants in a small area.
- The question asks for number of different species, not total number of plants.
🧠 Exam technique
For full marks, your method must include:
- Where the transect goes
- How quadrats are used
- What is counted
- Repeats for reliability
Best exam wording: at regular intervals , at right angles to the river , count different species .
❌ Common errors
- Saying the transect just goes “from the river into the field” without saying at right angles.
- Placing quadrats at random intervals. The mark scheme wants intervals along the transect.
- Counting the number of plants instead of the number of different species.
- Forgetting repeats. Repeats help make the results more reliable.
Model 4-mark answer:
Place a tape measure or line transect from the edge of the river into the field at right angles to the river. Put a quadrat at regular intervals along the transect, for example every 1 m. In each quadrat, count the number of different plant species. Repeat this using two more transects at different points along the river and compare the results or calculate a mean.
Part (b): Interpreting Figure 2
What is shown by the data?
✅ Correct answer
The mean value students can be most certain about is 5 metres from the river.
💡 Key knowledge
- The graph shows maximum, mean and minimum.
- You are most certain about a mean where the spread/range is smallest.
- At 5 m, the difference between maximum and minimum is the smallest, so results are most consistent there.
🧠 Exam technique
When asked what a graph shows, check the error bars or spread:
- Small spread = more consistency
- Large spread = less certainty
This is not asking for the highest mean. It is asking where the mean is most certain.
❌ Common errors
- Choosing 6 m because it has a high mean. High mean does not mean high certainty.
- Saying fewer species are always recorded nearer the river. The graph does not prove “always”.
- Calling the 6 m result anomalous when it fits the general pattern.
Part (c): Abiotic factor
Which abiotic factor could affect plant species near the river?
✅ Correct answer
Moisture levels in the soil
💡 Key knowledge
- Abiotic means non-living factors.
- Examples include light intensity, temperature, soil pH, mineral content, and soil moisture.
- Near a river, soil is often wetter, so moisture is a sensible factor affecting which plants grow there.
🧠 Exam technique
If you see a multiple-choice question on abiotic factors, quickly sort options into:
- Living = biotic
- Non-living = abiotic
Only one option here is clearly a non-living environmental condition.
❌ Common errors
- Microorganisms near the roots are living, so biotic.
- Primary consumers are living, so biotic.
- Oxygen concentration in the air is abiotic, but it is not the factor identified by the mark scheme for this river question.
Part (d): Environmental implications of increasing cow farming
6-mark extended response
✅ What a top-level answer includes
- More cows eat and trample more plants, so there are fewer plants.
- With fewer plants, there is less photosynthesis.
- Less photosynthesis means less CO₂ removed from the atmosphere.
- More cows also release CO₂ by respiration.
- Cows release methane, which is a greenhouse gas.
- This can increase the greenhouse effect / global warming.
- Land may be cleared for grazing, causing deforestation and reduced biodiversity.
- More cow faeces may enter rivers, causing water pollution and harming aquatic organisms.
💡 Key knowledge
- Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas.
- Methane is also a greenhouse gas.
- Deforestation can reduce habitats and therefore biodiversity.
- Animal waste entering water can cause pollution and damage ecosystems.
🧠 Exam technique
To reach Level 3 (5–6 marks), do more than list points. You must link cause and effect.
Strong chain style:
more cows → more grazing/trampling → fewer plants → less photosynthesis → more CO₂ in atmosphere → greater global warming
Try to give two or three linked chains rather than lots of separate bullet points.
❌ Common errors
- Only saying “it is bad for the environment” with no explanation.
- Listing methane or CO₂ without saying they are greenhouse gases or what this leads to.
- Not linking cow numbers to a consequence, for example less biodiversity or more global warming.
- Writing only about farming benefits. The question asks for environmental implications.
Mark breakdown
- Level 3 (5–6 marks): Relevant points are identified, given in detail and logically linked to form a clear account.
- Level 2 (3–4 marks): Relevant points are identified, with some attempt at logical linking, but the account is not fully clear.
- Level 1 (1–2 marks): Simple points are stated, but relevance is limited and there is little or no linking.
Model 6-mark answer:
Increasing numbers of cows can reduce the number of plants because more plants are eaten and more are trampled. This means there is less photosynthesis, so less carbon dioxide is removed from the atmosphere. Cows also release carbon dioxide by respiration, and they release methane. Carbon dioxide and methane are greenhouse gases, so increasing cow numbers can increase the greenhouse effect and cause more global warming.
More land may also be cleared to make farmland for cows, which can cause deforestation. This destroys habitats and reduces biodiversity. In addition, more cow faeces can enter rivers and streams, causing pollution and harming organisms living in the water.
Quick examiner insight for the whole question
What gained marks
- Using the exact practical terms transect and quadrat.
- Recognising that certainty in graph data depends on small spread.
- Knowing that soil moisture is an abiotic factor near a river.
- Writing a 6-mark response with clear linked environmental consequences.
Where students lost marks
- Describing random sampling instead of a proper transect method.
- Counting plant numbers or percentage cover instead of different species.
- Choosing graph answers based only on the mean, not the spread.
- Giving unlinked points in the final question instead of explained chains.
Topics
Biology · B7: Ecology · Biology Required Practicals
Question and mark scheme from the AQA GCSE Combined Science: Trilogy examination, Biology Paper 2 (Higher), 2023. QuestionVault is an independent revision resource; questions remain the copyright of the awarding body.