AQA GCSE Geography Paper 2, June 2025: Question 4

14 marks · Medium difficulty · Extended Response

Complete and interpret a choropleth map of households unable to afford a healthy diet, outline physical factors affecting food supply, and explain how seasonal food consumption and reducing food waste increase sustainability.

Practise this question

Question

Question 4 features Figure 13, a choropleth map showing parts of Asia shaded according to the percentage of households that could not afford a healthy diet in 2020, with five categories in the key: 80 or more, 60–79.9, 40–59.9, 20–39.9, and Less than 20. Question 04.1 requires completing the map for Pakistan and Mongolia using given data. Question 04.2 asks to name one country where 60–79.9% of households could not afford a healthy diet. Question 04.3 asks to identify how many countries had less than 20% from a multiple-choice selection, followed by calculating that as a percentage of the 21 countries to one decimal place. Question 04.4 asks to outline one or more ways that physical factors can affect food supply (3 marks). Question 04.5 asks to explain how seasonal food consumption and reducing food waste can lead to increased sustainability of food supply (6 marks).
Question text

Question 4 Food

Figure 13 is a map showing the percentage of households that could not afford

a healthy diet in 2020 in selected Asian countries.

04.1 Complete Figure 13 using the following data.

[2 marks]

Percentage of households that

Country

could not afford a healthy diet

Pakistan 80 or more

Mongolia 40–59.9

Figure 13

Kyrgyzstan

Kazakhstan

Mongolia

China Japan

Nepal

Iran Bhutan

South

Korea

Vietnam

India

Pakistan Laos

Philippines

Tajikistan Myanmar

Thailand Malaysia

Sri Lanka

Bangladesh

Key Indonesia

Percentage of households

that could not afford a

healthy diet in 2020

80 or more

60–79.9

40–59.9

N

20–39.9

27 0 1000 km

Less than 20

04.2 Name one country where 60–79.9% of households could not afford a healthy diet

in 2020.

(26) [1 mark]

04.3 How many of the countries shown in Figure 13 had less than 20% of households

that could not afford a healthy diet?

Shade one circle only.

[1 mark]

A 6

B 7

C 8

D 9

What percentage of the 21 countries for which data is shown had less than 20% of

households that could not afford a healthy diet?

Answer to one decimal place.

[1 mark]

… %

04.4 Outline one or more ways that physical factors can affect food supply.

[3 marks]

04.5 Explain how seasonal food consumption and reducing food waste can lead to

increased sustainability of food supply.

[6 marks]

U

(27) …

Extra space …

End of Question 4

If you have answered Question 4, do not answer Question 5 or 6

Mark scheme

Show the mark scheme Mark scheme for Question 4 detailing marking criteria: 04.1 awards 1 mark per country correctly shaded (Pakistan shaded 80 or more, Mongolia shaded 40–59.9). 04.2 awards 1 mark for any of Bangladesh, India, Indonesia, Laos, Myanmar, or Philippines. 04.3 awards 1 mark for A (6), and 1 mark for 28.6% (with error carried forward credited). 04.4 provides guidance on physical factors affecting food supply (flooding, poor soils, rainfall, pests, climate) for 3 marks. 04.5 provides a 3-level mark scheme (5–6 marks for Level 3 detailed response covering both seasonal food consumption and reducing food waste linked to sustainability) with detailed indicative content.

Total

Qu Pt Marking Guidance

marks

04 1 Complete Figure 13 using the following data. 2

One mark for each country correctly shaded.

AO4 – 2 marks

04 2 Name one country where 60–79.9% of households could not afford a 1

healthy diet in 2020.

One mark for any correctly named country:

Bangladesh, India, Indonesia, Laos, Myanmar, Philippines– – –

AO4 – 1 mark

04 3 How many of the countries shown in Figure 13 had less than 20% of 2

households that could not afford a healthy diet?

One mark for the correct answer.

A 6 (1 mark)

No credit if two or more statements are shaded.

What percentage of the 21 countries for which data is shown had less 27

than 20% of households that could not afford a healthy diet?

Answer to one decimal place.

28.6% (1 mark)

Percentage sign not required. Answer must be to one decimal place.

If the candidate has made a mistake in the first part then allow the

corresponding answer to the second part of the question:

B – 33.3%, C – 38.1%, D – 42.9%

AO4 – 2 marks

04 4 Outline one or more ways that physical factors can affect food supply. 3

Credit any reasonable statement where the factor is qualified or development

of a point, eg

• Flooding (1) may destroy crops (1).

• Poor soils (1) may make it hard for crops to grow (1).

• Limited rainfall (1) may lead to crop failure / animals dying (1) therefore

decreasing food supply (1)

• Climate change may increase the likelihood of higher temperatures (1) which

may lead to increased desertification (1) therefore decreased food supply (1)

• Some areas may suffer from pests (1) reducing farmer’s yield (1) such as

swarms of locusts in Kenya (1).

• Volcanic ash can lead to fertile soil (1) which increases yields (1)

• Credit relevant example for one mark

No credit for human factors.

Max 2 marks for list like statements with no development.

1×3, 3 x1 or (1+1)+1 – – –

AO2 – 3 marks

04 5 Explain how seasonal food consumption and reducing food waste can 6

lead to increased sustainability of food supply.

Level Marks Description

3 5–6 AO1 – Demonstrates detailed knowledge of seasonal

(Detailed) food consumption and reducing food waste.

28 AO2 – Shows thorough geographical understanding of

how seasonal food consumption and reducing food

waste can contribute to sustainability.

2 3–4 AO1 – Demonstrates clear knowledge of seasonal food

(Clear) consumption and/or reducing food waste.

AO2 – Shows reasonable geographical understanding

of how seasonal food consumption and/or reducing

food waste can contribute to sustainability.

1 1–2 AO1 – Demonstrates limited knowledge of seasonal

(Basic) food consumption and/or reducing food waste.

AO2 – Shows limited geographical understanding of

how seasonal food consumption and/or reducing food

waste can contribute to sustainability.

0 No relevant content

• Level 3 (detailed) responses will cover both seasonal food consumption

and reducing food waste in detail and link these to sustainability.

• Level 2 (clear) responses will cover seasonal food consumption and/or

reducing food waste clearly with at least an implicit link to sustainability.

• Level 1 (basic) responses will cover seasonal food consumption and/or

reducing food waste in a basic manner and / or merely assert the connection

to sustainability.

• Max Level 2 for addressing only one element of the question.

Indicative content

There is no requirement for a named example although some students may

choose to include one.

The question does not stipulate a HIC/NEE/LIC focus so credit any relevant

points.

Credit references to economic, social and environmental sustainability.

Clearly the exact content will vary according to the strategies chosen:

Seasonal food consumption

• Many food items travel thousands of miles to reach the UK as people expect

to have certain foods all year round.

• Some food travels from the country of origin to another country to be

processed before being transported to the UK.

• Encouraging people to eat more seasonally means more food can be grown–––

locally, which reduces the food miles.

• Reduction in the need for heated greenhouses.

• Farm shops can encourage people to shop locally for fresh produce. 29

• Local produce may contain fewer preservatives needed to keep it fresh /

may require less plastic packaging.

Reducing food waste

• Encouraging the buying of just what is needed, to prevent food being thrown

away.

• Reducing the waste during food production/transportation/processing.

• More effective storing of food (both during transportation and by shoppers) to

extend the life of fresh produce.

• Focus on ‘best before’ rather than ‘use by’ on labels of some types of food.

• Community food hubs where leftovers can be swapped or donated.

• Increased number of shops selling ‘imperfect’ vegetables.

• Credit those who refer to food loss i.e. at production/storage/market stage as

food waste.

Sustainability will equally vary according to strategies but is likely to include:

• Reduction in the distance food needs to travel therefore less CO2 is burnt by

aircraft/lorries reducing the impact on global climate change.

• Less energy is needed to heat greenhouses and for computerised watering

systems. This therefore uses fewer resources such as fossil fuels, which are

running out.

• Buying from local producers keeps farmers in business and can boost the

rural economy.

• Increased demand for local produce creates more jobs.

• Local produce may be fresher and more nutritious, boosting people’s health.

• Farmers markets and local enterprises such as food exchanges can bring

communities together.

• Reduced food waste requiring disposal.

• Increased packaging needed to keep food fresh whilst it travels many miles

also requires the use of resources and creates additional waste / or energy

to be spent recycling.

• Selling of ‘imperfect’ produce allows a profit to be made, whilst reducing

waste.

AO1 – 3 marks

AO2 – 3 marks

How to answer it

Global Food Supply, Insecurity & Sustainability

📋 WHAT THIS QUESTION TESTS

This question set evaluates core cartographic, mathematical, and conceptual skills from the Resource Management (Food) unit:

  • Cartographic Skills: Accurately completing and reading choropleth map keys and country data.
  • Maths & Statistics: Extracting discrete data values, calculating percentages from totals, and rounding accurately to 1 decimal place.
  • Physical Factors: Linking environmental conditions (climate, soil, hazards) directly to food production and supply.
  • Sustainable Strategies: Evaluating how seasonal consumption and reducing food waste contribute to environmental, economic, and social sustainability (6-mark level-marked question).
QUESTION 04.1 • 2 MARKS

Completing the Choropleth Map (Figure 13)

Complete Figure 13 using data for Pakistan (80 or more) and Mongolia (40–59.9)

✅ Shading Required

  • Pakistan: Fill with solid grey shading (representing ≥ 80%). [1 mark]
  • Mongolia: Fill with horizontal line hatching (representing 40–59.9%). [1 mark]

🧠 Exam Technique

  • Use a ruler for horizontal lines to ensure your hatching is clear and cannot be confused with diagonal or cross-hatching.
  • Double-check the boundaries so shading does not bleed into neighbouring countries like China or India.
Mark allocation: 1 mark per country correctly identified and shaded using the exact pattern in the key (AO4).
QUESTION 04.2 • 1 MARK

Data Retrieval from Map

Name one country where 60–79.9% of households could not afford a healthy diet in 2020.

✅ Acceptable Answers (Name Any ONE)

  • India
  • Bangladesh
  • Myanmar
  • Laos
  • Philippines
  • Indonesia

❌ Common Errors

  • Misreading the pattern: Mixing up the diagonal cross-hatch (60–79.9%) with single diagonal lines (20–39.9%, e.g. Thailand or Vietnam).
  • Writing more than one: If you write two and one is wrong, you risk losing the mark. Name only one country.
Mark allocation: 1 mark for any single correct country named from the 60–79.9% category (AO4).
QUESTION 04.3 • 2 MARKS

Map Tally & Percentage Calculation

Part 1: Multiple choice count | Part 2: Percentage calculation

✅ Correct Answers

Part 1 (Count): Option A (6) [1 mark]

Countries with dotted pattern (< 20%): Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, China, South Korea, Japan.

Part 2 (Percentage): 28.6% [1 mark]

📐 Step-by-Step Calculation

  1. Identify total count from part 1: 6 countries
  2. Identify the denominator given in the question: 21 countries
  3. Divide count by total: 6 ÷ 21 = 0.285714...
  4. Multiply by 100 to get a percentage: 28.5714...%
  5. Round to 1 decimal place: look at the hundredths digit (7 ≥ 5) → 28.6%

🧠 Error-Carried-Forward (ECF) Rule

If you selected the wrong multiple-choice answer in Part 1, the mark scheme allows full marks in Part 2 if calculated correctly from your count:

  • If chose B (7): 7 ÷ 21 = 33.3%
  • If chose C (8): 8 ÷ 21 = 38.1%
  • If chose D (9): 9 ÷ 21 = 42.9%

❌ Common Errors

  • Rounding errors: Writing 28.5% (truncating instead of rounding up) or 29% (forgetting 1 d.p.).
  • Shading multiple boxes: Shading more than one circle in the multiple-choice section automatically scores 0.
Mark allocation: 1 mark for Part 1 (A), 1 mark for Part 2 (28.6% to 1 d.p.) (AO4).
QUESTION 04.4 • 3 MARKS

Physical Factors Affecting Food Supply

Outline one or more ways that physical factors can affect food supply.

💡 Valid Physical Factors

  • Drought / Low Rainfall: Causes crops to wither and water sources for livestock to dry up, leading to crop failure.
  • Flooding: Submerges arable land, drowning crops and washing away nutrient-rich topsoil.
  • Temperature Extremes: Unseasonal frosts or intense heat kill vulnerable plants or stunt growth.
  • Pests & Diseases: Locust swarms or fungal blights devour harvests and decimate yields.
  • Volcanic Ash: Ash layers can initially smother crops, but weathered volcanic soils later boost fertility.

🧠 Structuring an "Outline" (3 Marks)

You can get 3 marks via:

  • 1 factor developed fully (1 × 3): Factor → mechanism → specific consequence on supply.
  • 2 factors (2 + 1): One developed, one simple.
  • 3 separate identified points (3 × 1).

Top response chain: "Severe drought (1) leads to parched soils so seeds cannot germinate (1), causing widespread crop failure and reduced food availability (1)."

❌ Examiner Trap: Human Factors

Zero credit is given for human causes: War, conflict, poverty, trade embargoes, or lack of machinery/fertiliser are human factors. Only discuss naturally occurring climate, weather, pest, or land factors.

Mark allocation: Max 2 marks for a simple list with no development. Maximum 3 marks for developed cause-and-effect reasoning (AO2).
QUESTION 04.5 • 6 MARKS

Extended Response: Sustainable Food Supply

Explain how seasonal food consumption and reducing food waste can lead to increased sustainability of food supply.

💡 Understanding the Core Strategies

1. Seasonal Food Consumption:
  • Eating food harvested naturally in season in the local region.
  • Drastically cuts food miles (fewer transport emissions from air freight/heavy lorries).
  • Removes the need for energy-intensive artificial heating/lighting in commercial greenhouses.
  • Keeps money within the local agricultural economy and supports domestic farmers.
2. Reducing Food Waste:
  • Better storage techniques and refrigerated transport (cold chains) prevent spoilage.
  • Supermarkets selling "imperfect" or wonky vegetables rather than discarding them.
  • Clearer food labelling (difference between 'Best Before' and 'Use By').
  • Reduces landfill waste (lowering methane gas production) and ensures more produced food actually feeds people.

🧠 Level Marking Criteria & Rule

  • Level 3 (5–6 marks): Detailed knowledge of both seasonal food AND reducing food waste, with clear explanation of how they enhance sustainability (social, economic, environmental).
  • Level 2 (3–4 marks): Clear explanation of one or both strategies, with reasonable/implicit links to sustainability.
  • ⚠️ The Golden Rule: Maximum Level 2 (4 marks) if you only discuss ONE of the strategies! You must write about both.

✅ Model Paragraph Structure

Paragraph 1 (Seasonal Food): "Eating food in season reduces food miles because food does not need to be imported via air freight from abroad. This burns fewer fossil fuels, reducing CO₂ emissions and combating climate change (environmental sustainability). It also supports local farm businesses economically."

Paragraph 2 (Reducing Waste): "Retailers selling misshapen 'wonky' produce ensures that all harvested food enters the supply chain rather than rotting in fields or going to landfill. Less organic matter in landfill reduces methane emissions, and more people are fed without needing to clear additional land for farming."

❌ What Distinguishes Top Answers from Weak Answers

  • Weak responses: Merely state that eating seasonal food is "healthier" or that wasting food is "bad", without defining what sustainability means.
  • Top-level responses: Explicitly link mechanisms to the pillars of sustainability (Environmental: lower CO₂/methane, less land clearance; Economic: lower farm production costs, local jobs; Social: accessible affordable nutrition).
Mark allocation: 3 marks AO1 (Knowledge of strategies) + 3 marks AO2 (Application to sustainability). Maximum 4 marks if only one component is covered.

Topics

3.2 Challenges in the human environment · 3.4 Geographical skills · 3.2.3 Section C: The challenge of resource management · 3.4.1 Cartographic skills · 3.4.2 Graphical skills · 3.4.3 Numerical skills · 3.4.4 Statistical skills

Question and mark scheme from the AQA GCSE Geography examination, Paper 2, June 2025. QuestionVault is an independent revision resource; questions remain the copyright of the awarding body.