Edexcel A-Level Chemistry Paper 1, June 2018: Question 9
15 marks · Medium difficulty · Calculations
Calculate entropy changes, Gibbs free energy, and the equilibrium constant for chemical reactions, and explain reaction conditions using kinetic and thermodynamic considerations.
Practise this questionQuestion
Question text
9 This question is about entropy and free energy.
(a) Complete the table by giving the sign of the entropy change of the system,
∆Ssystem, for each reaction.
(2)
Reaction Sign of ∆Ssystem
CO2(s) → CO2(g)
NaCl(s) + aq → NaCl(aq)
N2(g) + 3H2(g) → 2NH3(g)
(b) Calculate the total entropy change, ∆Stotal, for the thermal decomposition of
calcium carbonate at 298K.
CaCO3(s) → CaO(s) + CO2(g)
[Data: ∆ H = +178 kJ mol−1 ∆S = +160 J K−1 mol−1]
r system
(3)
*P52302RA02028*
(iii) In industry, the reaction is carried out at about 700K using a
vanadium(V) oxide catalyst.
Calculate the value of the equilibrium constant, K, at 700K.
∆G at 700 K is –60 kJ mol−1
(3)
(iv) The equilibrium constant has a larger value at 298K than at 700K.
Explain why the reaction is carried out at 700K and not at 298K.
(2)
(Total for Question 9 = 15 marks)
Mark scheme
Show the mark scheme
Question
Acceptable Answer Additional Guidance Mark
Number
9(a) Example of table (2)
all 3 correct (2)
any 2 correct (1)
Question
Acceptable Answer Additional Guidance Mark
Number
9(b) Example of calculation (3)
use of ∆Ssurroundings = −∆H/T (1) -(178000÷298) / -(178÷298)
calculation of ∆S (1) -597(.315) (J K−1 mol−1)
surroundings
or
-0.597(315) (kJ K−1 mol−1)
TE on equation with minus sign missing
calculation of ∆Stotal
and 160 + (-0.597315) = -0.437(315) kJ K−1 mol−1
sign 1000
and or
units (1) 160 + (-0.597315 x 1000)
= -437.(315) J K−1 mol−1
TE on ∆Ssurroundings
Allow correct units shown once in answer for
∆Stotal or ∆Ssurroundings
Ignore SF except 1SF
Correct answer with sign and units without
working scores 3 marks
Question
Acceptable Answer Additional Guidance Mark
Number
9(c)(i) Example of calculation (2)
correct working (1) (2 x 95.6) – ((2 x 248.1) + 205.0) /
(2 x 95.6) – (2 x 248.1) − 205.0
correct answer -510(.0) (J K−1 mol−1 )
and or
sign (1) -0.510 (kJ K−1 mol−1)
TE on working
Ignore SF except 1SF
Correct answer with sign and without
working scores both marks
Question
Acceptable Answer Additional Guidance Mark
Number
9(c)(ii) Example of calculation (3)
use of ∆G = ∆H − T∆Ssystem (1) The equation may be stated or numbers substituted
directly e.g.−288.4 – (298 x −0.510) / −288400 – (298 x
−510)
calculation of ∆G −136(.42) kJ mol−1 / −136420 J mol−1
and
sign TE on ∆Ssystem in (i)
and
units (1) Ignore SF except 1SF
Correct answer with sign and units without working scores
both marks
∆G is negative / less than 0 / <0 Conditional on a stated number
and TE on sign of ∆G:
so the reaction is feasible (1) ∆G is positive / greater than 0 / >0 so the reaction is
not feasible
Question
Acceptable Answer Additional Guidance Mark
Number
9(c)(iii) Example of calculation (3)
use of ∆G = −RTlnK (1) −60000 = − 8.31 x 700 lnK
rearrangement of equation (lnK = −∆G/RT)
and lnK = −(−60000)
substitution of correct values (1) (8.31 x 700)
Allow lnK = 60000
8.31 x 700
Allow lnK = 10.3146 / 10.315 / 10.32 / 10.3 / 10
TE on equation, provided equation involves all of
∆G, K, R and T and no others e.g. S
calculation of K (1) K = e10.315 = 3.016975x 104 / 30169.75
TE on lnK expression / value
Allow answers based on earlier correct rounding
Ignore SF including 1SF
Ignore units
Correct answer without working scores 3 marks
Question
Acceptable Answer Additional Guidance Mark
Number
9(c)(iv) An explanation that makes reference to any two of Allow reverse argument for M1 and M2 (2)
the following points:
Ignore reference to changing the pressure
Yield - even though the (percentage) yield / amount Allow the unused reactants can be recycled to
of SO3 is higher at 298 K / lower temperature (1) increase the yield / products are removed to
increase the yield
Allow the reaction does not reach equilibrium
in industry so there is no effect on the yield
Ignore just a reference to ‘equilibrium
shifting’
Rate - the rate of reaction is slower at 298 K / lower Ignore references to activation energy
temperature (1)
Compromise - so 700 K is a compromise between Allow at 700K the amount of product per unit
a (high) yield and (high) rate (1) time is larger
Ignore just ‘700 K is more economically
viable’
Note
If three points are made related to yield, rate
and compromise and one of these is
incorrect, maximum mark is (1) for 1 correct
point
(Total for Question 9 = 15 marks)
How to answer it
Thermodynamics: Entropy Changes, Gibbs Free Energy & Equilibrium
- Predicting entropy changes (ΔSsystem): Relating changes in state and number of gaseous moles to disorder.
- Entropy calculations: Determining ΔSsurroundings from -ΔH/T and combining to find ΔStotal.
- Standard molar entropies: Calculating ΔSsystem using ΣS°(products) - ΣS°(reactants).
- Gibbs Free Energy & Feasibility: Using ΔG = ΔH - TΔSsystem and understanding that ΔG < 0 defines feasibility.
- Quantitative Equilibrium: Linking ΔG to the equilibrium constant using ΔG = -RT ln K.
- Industrial compromises: Balancing thermodynamic yield against reaction kinetics/rate.
Part (a) Predicting Signs of Entropy Change
Qualitative assessment of ΔSsystem (2 Marks)
✅ Correct Table Entries
| Reaction | Sign of ΔSsystem |
|---|---|
| CO₂(s) → CO₂(g) | Positive (+) |
| NaCl(s) + aq → NaCl(aq) | Positive (+) |
| N₂(g) + 3H₂(g) → 2NH₃(g) | Negative (-) |
💡 Key Knowledge
- Solid to Gas: Gas particles possess far higher translational energy and positional disorder than a rigid solid lattice → ΔS > 0.
- Dissolving an ionic solid: Dissolving frees ions from a fixed lattice into solution, increasing dispersal of matter/energy → ΔS > 0.
- Gas mole change: 4 moles of gas react to form 2 moles of gas. A decrease in gaseous particles means fewer microstates and less disorder → ΔS < 0.
Part (b) Calculating Total Entropy Change (ΔStotal)
Decomposition of CaCO₃(s) at 298 K (3 Marks)
📐 Step-by-Step Calculation
- Calculate ΔSsurroundings:
Formula: ΔSsurroundings = -ΔH / T
Convert ΔH to J mol⁻¹: +178 kJ mol⁻¹ = +178 000 J mol⁻¹
ΔSsurroundings = -(+178 000) / 298 = -597.315 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹ (or -0.5973 kJ K⁻¹ mol⁻¹)Award 1 mark for formula usage, 1 mark for correct value. - Calculate ΔStotal:
Formula: ΔStotal = ΔSsystem + ΔSsurroundings
Ensure identical units! Given ΔSsystem = +160 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹
ΔStotal = +160 + (-597.315) = -437 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹ (or -0.437 kJ K⁻¹ mol⁻¹)Award 1 mark for final answer with sign AND matching units. (Allow 3-4 SF: -437 or -437.3)
❌ Common Errors
- Unit mismatch: Adding +160 directly to -0.597 without converting both to J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹ or both to kJ K⁻¹ mol⁻¹.
- Sign dropped: Forgetting the negative sign in the formula -ΔH / T .
- Omitting units: Mark 3 strictly requires correct sign AND correct units (e.g. J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹).
🧠 Exam Technique
Always write down units next to each intermediate number. If ΔStotal is negative at 298 K, this correctly reflects that calcium carbonate does not spontaneously decompose at room temperature!
Part (c)(i) Calculating ΔSsystem from Molar Entropies
Reaction: 2SO₂(g) + O₂(g) → 2SO₃(g) (2 Marks)
📐 Step-by-Step Calculation
- Apply Stoichiometry:
ΔSsystem = ΣS°(products) - ΣS°(reactants)
Reactants = (2 × 248.1) + 205.0 = 496.2 + 205.0 = 701.2 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹
Products = 2 × 95.6 = 191.2 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹Award 1 mark for correct working expression. - Subtract Reactants from Products:
ΔSsystem = 191.2 - 701.2 = -510 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹ (or -0.510 kJ K⁻¹ mol⁻¹)Award 1 mark for answer with sign and units.
❌ Common Errors
- Swapping reactants and products: Calculating Reactants - Products gives +510 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹ (incorrect sign).
- Ignoring stoichiometric coefficients: Forgetting to multiply SO₂ and SO₃ entropy values by 2.
🧠 Sanity Check
3 moles of gas → 2 moles of gas. Since gaseous moles decrease, ΔSsystem must be negative. If your answer is positive, re-check your subtraction order.
Part (c)(ii) Gibbs Free Energy & Feasibility
Calculate ΔG at 298 K (3 Marks)
📐 Step-by-Step Calculation
- Formula & Unit Alignment:
ΔG = ΔH - TΔSsystem
Convert ΔSsystem to kJ K⁻¹ mol⁻¹: -510 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹ = -0.510 kJ K⁻¹ mol⁻¹
Given: ΔH = -288.4 kJ mol⁻¹, T = 298 KAward 1 mark for formula or correct substitution of values. - Calculate ΔG:
ΔG = -288.4 - [298 × (-0.510)]
ΔG = -288.4 - (-151.98) = -288.4 + 151.98 = -136.42 kJ mol⁻¹ (or -136 kJ mol⁻¹)Award 1 mark for correct value with negative sign and units (kJ mol⁻¹ or J mol⁻¹). - Feasibility Deduction:
Because ΔG < 0 (negative), the reaction is feasible at 298 K.Award 1 mark for linking negative ΔG to feasibility. (Transfer of error applies if ΔG was positive).
❌ Common Errors
- Double negative blunder: -(-151.98) becomes +151.98. Students often accidentally subtract 151.98 instead of adding it.
- Unit mixing: Combining -288.4 (kJ) directly with 298 × (-510) (J) without dividing by 1000.
🧠 Exam Technique
Always state the condition explicitly: "Since ΔG is negative (< 0), the reaction is feasible." Never simply write "yes".
Part (c)(iii) Calculating Equilibrium Constant (K)
Using ΔG = -RT ln K at 700 K (3 Marks)
📐 Step-by-Step Calculation
- State Formula & Substitute:
ΔG = -RT ln K
Convert ΔG into J mol⁻¹ because R is in J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹: ΔG = -60 kJ mol⁻¹ = -60 000 J mol⁻¹
-60 000 = -(8.31) × 700 × ln KAward 1 mark for formula and correct substitution. - Rearrange for ln K:
ln K = -ΔG / (R × T)
ln K = -(-60 000) / (8.31 × 700) = 60 000 / 5817 = +10.315Award 1 mark for correct rearrangement and calculating ln K (accept 10.3 to 10.32). - Solve for K:
K = e10.315 = 3.02 × 10⁴ (or 30 200)Award 1 mark for final calculated value of K. (K has no required units here; any reasonable SF accepted).
❌ Common Errors
- Neglecting J vs kJ: Using ΔG = -60 instead of -60 000. This results in ln K = 0.0103 and K ≈ 1.01, which is completely wrong.
- Inverse log error: Using 10x instead of ex ( ln is base e, not base 10).
- Losing the double negative: Notice that -(-60 000) produces a positive ln K value.
💡 Key Rule
Whenever gas constant R = 8.31 J K⁻¹ mol⁻¹ appears in a formula, free energy ΔG MUST be converted into Joules (multiply kJ by 1000).
Part (c)(iv) Industrial Compromise: Kinetics vs Equilibrium
Why run at 700 K instead of 298 K? (2 Marks)
✅ Acceptable Points (Any Two)
- Yield / Equilibrium: The yield of SO₃ is lower at 700 K (or higher at 298 K) because the forward reaction is exothermic. [1 mark]
- Rate of reaction: At 298 K the rate of reaction is far too slow / at 700 K the rate of reaction is much faster. [1 mark]
- Compromise: 700 K is an economic compromise between acceptable rate and acceptable yield. [1 mark]
🧠 Examiner Insight
- Avoid vague statements: Writing "700 K is more economically viable" earns zero marks unless you explain that it provides a faster rate of production.
- Contradiction trap: If you write three points and one is scientifically incorrect, the mark scheme caps you at a maximum of 1 mark! Be concise and accurate.
- Mention both axes: High-scoring students explicitly state that 298 K gives better yield (thermodynamics) but 700 K gives acceptable rate (kinetics).
Topics
Physical Chemistry · Topic 13: Energetics II · Topic 10: Equilibrium I · Topic 9: Kinetics I
Question and mark scheme from the Edexcel A-Level Chemistry examination, Paper 1, June 2018. QuestionVault is an independent revision resource; questions remain the copyright of the awarding body.