Edexcel A-Level Chemistry AS Paper 2, June 2025: Question 3
9 marks · Medium difficulty · Practical Techniques and Data Analysis
Predict the enthalpy of combustion of hexan-1-ol, calculate the enthalpy change of combustion of octan-1-ol from calorimetry experimental data, and evaluate experimental errors.
Practise this questionQuestion
Mark scheme
Show the mark scheme
How to answer it
Enthalpy Changes: Combustion of Alcohols & Calorimetry
This question assesses core practical and theoretical enthalpy concepts from Energetics:
- Trend Extrapolation: Recognising constant CH₂ increments in a homologous series to predict standard enthalpy of combustion.
- Calorimetry Calculations: Calculating heat energy transferred using q = mcΔT , finding moles burned ( n = m / M ), and computing ΔcH with the correct sign and units.
- Evaluating Experimental Errors: Understanding why uninsulated laboratory calorimetry values differ from published data book values.
- Procedural Flaws: Analysing how poor experimental technique (leaving the thermometer at the bottom of the beaker without stirring) causes systematic error in temperature measurement and the calculated enthalpy.
Predicting Enthalpy of Combustion for Hexan-1-ol
Trend in the homologous series of alcohols
✅ Correct Answer
-3975 kJ mol⁻¹
(Acceptable range: -3950 to -4010 kJ mol⁻¹)
💡 Key Knowledge
Each additional -CH₂- group increases the combustion enthalpy by a roughly constant amount (~650–655 kJ mol⁻¹):
- Ethanol − Methanol = −1367 − (−726) = −641 kJ mol⁻¹
- Propan-1-ol − Ethanol = −2021 − (−1367) = −654 kJ mol⁻¹
- Butan-1-ol − Propan-1-ol = −2676 − (−2021) = −655 kJ mol⁻¹
Hexan-1-ol has two extra -CH₂- units compared to butan-1-ol:
-2676 + 2(-650) ≈ -3976 kJ mol⁻¹
❌ Common Errors
- Adding only one -CH₂- step: Calculating for pentan-1-ol (5 carbons) instead of hexan-1-ol (6 carbons).
- Positive sign: Giving +3975 kJ mol⁻¹. Combustion is always exothermic, so positive signs are strictly rejected.
Calculating Enthalpy of Combustion of Octan-1-ol
Step-by-step calorimetric calculation
📐 Step-by-Step Calculation
- Mass of octan-1-ol burned:
m(alcohol) = 20.95 - 20.15 = 0.80 g → [Mark 1] - Temperature rise of water:
ΔT = 48.3 - 21.0 = 27.3 °C → [Mark 2] - Heat absorbed by water (q):
q = m(water) × c × ΔT
q = 200 g × 4.18 J g⁻¹ °C⁻¹ × 27.3 °C = 22822.8 J = 22.823 kJ → [Mark 3] - Moles of octan-1-ol burned & final ΔcH:
n = m / M = 0.80 g / 130 g mol⁻¹ = 6.1538 × 10⁻³ mol
ΔcH = -q / n = -22.8228 kJ / (0.80 / 130 mol) = -3708.7 kJ mol⁻¹ → [Mark 4]
✅ Acceptable Final Answers
- -3710 kJ mol⁻¹ (3 s.f.)
- -3709 kJ mol⁻¹ (4 s.f.)
- -3708.7 kJ mol⁻¹
(Negative sign is required for the final mark!)
🧠 Exam Technique: Securing 4/4
- Use mass of water for q: Always use 200 g (water), NEVER the alcohol mass, in q = mcΔT .
- Avoid premature rounding: If you round moles to 0.006 (1 s.f.), you will lose the final accuracy mark. Keep the full fraction 0.80 / 130 in your calculator.
- Check your sign: Combustion produces heat (exothermic), so ΔcH must carry a negative (−) sign.
❌ Common Traps to Avoid
- Forgetting the negative sign: An answer of +3710 kJ mol⁻¹ scores 3/4 marks (loses M4).
- Adding 273 to ΔT: Temperature change is identical in °C and K. Adding 273 ( 273 + 27.3 = 300.3 ) causes the loss of M3.
- Omitting unit conversion: Forgetting to divide by 1000 gives -3 708 700 kJ mol⁻¹ , losing the final mark if written as kJ mol⁻¹.
• M1: Mass of alcohol burned = 0.80 g
• M2: Temperature change = 27.3 °C
• M3: Energy change q = 22823 J (or 22.823 kJ)
• M4: Enthalpy change with negative sign = -3708.7 / -3709 / -3710 kJ mol⁻¹ (TE allowed from earlier steps)
Comparing Experimental Value to Data Book Value
Explaining the effect of an uninsulated calorimeter
✅ Model Answer (2 Marks)
1. The experimental value of ΔcH will be less negative / less exothermic (or data book value is more negative).
2. Because heat is lost / escapes to the surroundings / calorimeter.
🧠 Exam Technique: Word Precision
Be extremely careful when describing enthalpy values that are negative numbers:
- Say "less negative" or "less exothermic".
- Do NOT write "the value is smaller/lower" without context, as mathematically −2000 is greater than −3700, leading to ambiguity.
- Link cause directly to the specific fault given: the prompt specifies "calorimeter is not insulated", so the reason must be heat loss.
❌ Examiner Pitfalls
- Irrelevant reasons: Mentioning "incomplete combustion" or "specific heat capacity is an approximation" scores 0 for the explanation mark here because the question specifically prompts about lack of insulation.
- Vague descriptions: "Energy lost" or "energy dissipates" without specifying to the surroundings or to the calorimeter loses the second mark.
- Saying "more positive": Strictly not allowed by the mark scheme.
• Mark 1: Experimental value is less negative / less exothermic (allow reverse argument for data book value).
• Mark 2: Heat/energy lost to surroundings / to the calorimeter.
Effect of Inadequate Stirring & Thermometer Placement
Systematic procedural error
✅ Model Answer (2 Marks)
1. Effect on temperature: The temperature recorded by the thermometer will be higher (as the bottom of the beaker is hotter than the average temperature without stirring) / the recorded temperature change ( ΔT ) would be larger. [1 Mark]
2. Effect on calculated enthalpy: Therefore, the calculated ΔcH will be more negative / more exothermic / larger in magnitude. [1 Mark]
💡 Key Knowledge
The spirit burner flame is directly under the base of the beaker. Convection distributes heat, but without stirring, a localised thermal gradient forms:
Base of beaker (where thermometer rests) >> Average temperature of water
A higher recorded ΔT leads to an artificially high calculated heat value q , making ΔcH more exothermic (more negative).
❌ Common Errors
- Claiming reaction is incomplete: Writing that alcohol "did not react completely if not stirred" is physically incorrect; stirring affects the water, not the flame.
- Vague statements: Stating merely that "there is a temperature difference" or "uneven heat" without stating the recorded reading will be higher.
- Ambiguous enthalpy effect: Stating just "enthalpy change would be bigger" without clarifying that it is bigger in magnitude, more exothermic, or more negative.
• Mark 1: Temperature recorded of the water will be higher / temperature change would be larger.
• Mark 2: Calculated ΔcH will be more negative / more exothermic / higher in magnitude (must follow from M1 or near-miss).
Topics
Physical Chemistry · Topic 8: Energetics I
Question and mark scheme from the Edexcel A-Level Chemistry examination, AS Paper 2, June 2025. QuestionVault is an independent revision resource; questions remain the copyright of the awarding body.