OCR GCSE Computer Science Computer systems (01), June 2025: Question 3

8 marks · Hard difficulty · Extended Response

Discuss the ethical, environmental, and practical impacts on both the company and customers when a tablet manufacturer cuts manufacturing costs and stops software updates for older devices.

Practise this question

Question

Question 3 marked with an asterisk: An 8-mark extended-response question stating that a tablet manufacturing company intends to reduce manufacturing costs and stop releasing software updates for older models, causing customers to replace devices more frequently. It directs students to discuss the impact of these decisions on the company and customers, covering ethical issues, environmental issues, and benefits and drawbacks, followed by ruled writing lines.
Question text

A company designs and builds tablet computers. The company wants to reduce the cost of

manufacturing their tablet computers. The company also decides to stop releasing software

updates for their older tablet computers. This means customers will need to change their devices

more often.

Discuss the impact of these decisions on the company and the customers.

Include in your answer:

• ethical issues

• environmental issues

• benefits and drawbacks. [8]

Mark scheme

Show the mark scheme Mark scheme for Question 3 displaying a 3-band level of response rubric (Band 3: 6–8 marks, Band 2: 3–5 marks, Band 1: 1–2 marks) and bulleted indicative content covering ethical issues (e.g. pricing, planned obsolescence, fairness), environmental issues (e-waste, recycling), and benefits and drawbacks for both the company and customers.

3 Mark Band 3–High Level 8 The following is indicative

(6-8 marks) of possible

The candidate demonstrates a thorough knowledge and understanding of a wide range of factors/evidence that

considerations in relation to the question; the material is generally accurate and detailed. candidates may refer to

The candidate is able to apply their knowledge and understanding directly and consistently to the but is not prescriptive or

context provided. Evidence/examples will be explicitly relevant to the explanation. exhaustive:

The candidate is able to weigh up both sides of the discussion and includes reference to the impact Indicative Content:

on all areas showing thorough recognition of influencing factors.

There is a well-developed line of reasoning which is clear and logically structured. The information Ethical issues:

presented is relevant and substantiated. • Will cost remain the

Includes benefits and drawbacks. At least one ethical and at least one environmental issue. same? – unfair on

References both customer and company clearly for top of band. Points are expanded. customers

• Will customers be told?

Mark Band 2-Mid Level Or are they being

(3-5 marks) deceived?

The candidate demonstrates reasonable knowledge and understanding of a range of considerations • Can improve profit for

in relation to the question; the material is generally accurate but at times underdeveloped. company – allow staff

The candidate is able to apply their knowledge and understanding directly to the context provided to be paid more

although one or two opportunities are missed. Evidence/examples are for the most part implicitly • Ethical to the company

relevant to the explanation. but unethical to the

The candidate makes a reasonable attempt to discuss the impact on most areas, showing customers

reasonable recognition of influencing factors. • Reduced cost may

There is a line of reasoning presented with some structure. The information presented is in the most mean reduced

part relevant and supported by some evidence. reputation- long term

Covers benefits or drawbacks to achieve band, top of band requires at least one of each. Covers loss If people move to

ethical and/or environmental. Some points are expanded. May only reference customer or company. other companies

• Customers want most

Mark Band 1-Low Level up-to-date devices –

(1-2 marks) prepared to spend

The candidate demonstrates a basic knowledge of considerations with limited understanding shown; regularly

the material is basic and contains some inaccuracies. The candidate makes a limited attempt to apply • Lower cost to purchase

acquired knowledge and understanding to the context provided. may allow more people

The candidate provides nothing more than an unsupported assertion. to afford device

The information is basic and communicated in an unstructured way. The information is supported by Environmental issues

limited evidence and the relationship to the evidence may not be clear.

• Increase in e-waste

Has a point for ethical/environmental/benefit/drawback, not all relevant. May not reference customer

from products that are

or company.

disposed

0 marks

J277/01 Mark Scheme10 June 2025

• No attempt to answer the question or response is not worthy of credit • Older devices could

be distributed to

people without

devices to reduce

waste

• Products could be

recycled for

components

Benefits and drawbacks:

• Company

Increase sales

Increase profit

Decrease

popularity/reputation

• Customer

Increase in cost

May be able to buy

when couldn’t before if

initial cost is less

Less reliable devices

Effort/time to install

new devices more

regularly

How to answer it

Impacts of Manufacturing and Planned Obsolescence

📋 What this question tests

This 8-mark extended-response question (Question 3*) assesses your ability to discuss real-world computing scenarios under Topic 1.6: Impacts of Digital Technology. Specifically, it tests:

  • Understanding of ethical issues (fairness, planned obsolescence, consumer trust, affordability).
  • Understanding of environmental issues (e-waste, finite resource depletion, energy usage, recycling).
  • Evaluating benefits and drawbacks for both the company and the customers.
  • Structuring a balanced, coherent, and substantiated written argument across distinct viewpoints.

Question 3* Analysis & Marking Breakdown

Level of Response (8 Marks Total)

💡 Level Breakdown (How Marks Are Won)

  • Band 3 (6–8 marks): Balanced discussion covering both company and customers, including both ethical and environmental issues, weighing benefits and drawbacks with expanded, justified points. Well-structured and logical.
  • Band 2 (3–5 marks): Covers either company or customer well, or touches on both shallowly. Covers ethical and/or environmental factors, but some points lack depth or real explanation.
  • Band 1 (1–2 marks): Brief, isolated bullet-point style thoughts, simple assertions without explanation (e.g. "it causes pollution"), or ignores either ethics or the environment completely.

🧠 Exam Technique: The "2 × 2 × 2" Rule

The asterisk (*) means your quality of written communication is assessed. To hit Band 3 reliably, make sure your essay addresses:

  • Stakeholders: Company AND Customers
  • Themes: Ethical issues AND Environmental issues
  • Balance: Benefits AND Drawbacks

Organise your answer into 3 or 4 clear paragraphs using linking words like "Consequently", "On the other hand", and "As a result".

Indicative Revision Content

Key arguments you can use in your answer

Theme 1 Ethical Issues

  • Planned Obsolescence: Forcing customers to replace hardware by stopping software updates can be seen as deceitful, manipulating users into spending money unnecessarily.
  • Security Vulnerabilities: Without software updates, older tablets will not receive security patches, putting customer data at risk of malware and hacking.
  • Fairness & Pricing: If the company reduces manufacturing costs, will savings be passed to customers, or will prices remain high to increase profit margins?
  • Accessibility / Digital Divide: Cheaper manufacturing might reduce retail prices, allowing lower-income families to afford a tablet.

Theme 2 Environmental Issues

  • E-Waste (Electronic Waste): Customers replacing devices more frequently causes rapid accumulation of e-waste in landfills, releasing toxic heavy metals (e.g. lead, mercury, cadmium).
  • Depletion of Finite Resources: Higher tablet production uses up precious and rare-earth materials (e.g. lithium, copper, gold) that require damaging mining practices.
  • Carbon Footprint: Manufacturing and shipping more units dramatically increases factory emissions and overall energy consumption.
  • Mitigation / Recycling: Discarded tablets could be recycled for parts, or older functioning tablets could be refurbished and donated to reduce digital exclusion.

Evaluating Stakeholders: Company vs Customer

Weighing up the benefits and drawbacks

✅ Impact on the Company

  • Benefits:
    • Cheaper production costs mean higher profit margins per tablet sold.
    • Ending software support forces faster upgrade cycles, increasing ongoing sales volume and revenue.
    • Less money spent on software developers maintaining legacy code.
  • Drawbacks:
    • Risk of brand damage: customers feeling exploited may switch to competitors offering longer software support.
    • Lower manufacturing costs may lead to inferior build quality, leading to high return rates and poor reviews.

✅ Impact on the Customer

  • Benefits:
    • If the company passes on manufacturing savings, customers enjoy a lower initial purchase price.
    • Customers who upgrade frequently gain access to newer hardware features and faster processors.
  • Drawbacks:
    • Financial strain: customers must spend money repeatedly to stay up to date.
    • Frustration and wasted time transferring data, reinstalling apps, and setting up new tablets frequently.
    • Unsupported devices become sluggish, bug-ridden, and insecure.

Band 3 Model Structure & Examiner Warnings

How to write the perfect response

🧠 High-Scoring Essay Plan (4 Paragraphs)

  1. Paragraph 1 (Company Benefits & Ethics): Discuss reduced costs leading to higher profits and recurring revenue from frequent upgrades. Weigh against the ethical issue of planned obsolescence and potential loss of brand trust.
  2. Paragraph 2 (Customer Impact): Explain how lower prices might help new buyers, but existing customers face higher long-term costs, data security risks without patches, and the inconvenience of device replacement.
  3. Paragraph 3 (Environmental Impact): Explain how rapid replacement cycles cause a huge surge in toxic e-waste and raw material extraction. Contrast this with recycling schemes or donating older tablets.
  4. Paragraph 4 (Conclusion / Weighing Up): Summarise whether the decision is justifiable: while profitable in the short term, it harms the environment and risks alienating customers in the long run.
Examiner Tip: Always develop your points using cause and effect. Don't just say "it causes e-waste"; say "devices are discarded sooner, leading to an increase in toxic e-waste that can leak into groundwater if not properly recycled."

❌ Common Mistakes to Avoid

  • Only talking about one stakeholder: Focusing entirely on how angry customers will be, while forgetting to discuss the business benefits (profits, sales) for the company.
  • Leaving out the environment: Spending the entire answer discussing money and ethics, ignoring e-waste and raw material usage.
  • Unsubstantiated bullet points: Writing a list of short phrases. Level-marked questions require continuous prose and explained consequences.
  • Confusing software updates with hardware faults: Stopping updates does not make the tablet explode or stop turning on immediately; it means apps become incompatible and security flaws remain unpatched.

Topics

1.6 Ethical, legal, cultural and environmental impacts of digital technology · 1.6.1 Ethical, legal, cultural and environmental impact

Question and mark scheme from the OCR GCSE Computer Science examination, Computer systems (01), June 2025. QuestionVault is an independent revision resource; questions remain the copyright of the awarding body.