WJEC A-Level Chemistry AS Unit 1, June 2025: Question 11
14 marks · Medium difficulty · Structured Questions
Explain trends in boiling temperatures of Group 5 hydrides, use VSEPR theory to deduce the shape and bond angle of PH3, evaluate qualitative tests for halides, and explain a redox reaction using oxidation states.
Practise this questionQuestion
Mark scheme
Show the mark scheme
How to answer it
Group 5 Hydrides, Molecular Shapes & Halide Chemistry
This 14-mark structured question integrates fundamental physical, inorganic, and practical analytical concepts from WJEC AS Chemistry:
- Intermolecular forces: Distinguishing hydrogen bonding from London dispersion (van der Waals) forces and explaining relative boiling points.
- VSEPR Theory: Deducing electron pair geometry, shape names, and predicting bond angle deviations due to lone-pair repulsion.
- Inorganic practical analysis: Critical evaluation of silver nitrate precipitation and halogen displacement tests for halide ions.
- Redox chemistry: Assigning oxidation states and defining oxidation and reduction in terms of electron transfer and oxidation numbers.
Boiling Points: NH₃ vs PH₃
Explaining why the boiling temperature of PH₃ (−88 °C) is lower than that of NH₃ (−33 °C)
✅ Model Answer
NH₃ forms hydrogen bonds between molecules, whereas PH₃ only has weaker van der Waals (induced dipole-dipole) forces.
Hydrogen bonds are significantly stronger than van der Waals forces, requiring more energy to overcome in NH₃.
💡 Key Knowledge
- Hydrogen bonding occurs when H is bonded to a small, highly electronegative atom with a lone pair (N, O, or F).
- Nitrogen is electronegative enough to form hydrogen bonds; phosphorus has a lower electronegativity, so PH₃ cannot form intermolecular hydrogen bonds.
- Boiling breaks intermolecular forces, not covalent bonds!
🧠 Exam Technique
- Name both forces explicitly: You must name the force in NH₃ (hydrogen bonding) AND the force in PH₃ (van der Waals forces).
- Energy comparison: Always explicitly connect force strength to the energy needed to overcome them.
❌ Common Errors
- Stating that covalent bonds are broken when boiling hydrides (automatic loss of marks).
- Failing to mention that forces exist between molecules.
- Assuming PH₃ can form hydrogen bonds simply because it contains hydrogen and a Group 5 element.
• [1 Mark] NH₃ has hydrogen bonding (between molecules) whilst PH₃ has van der Waals forces.
• [1 Mark] Hydrogen bonding is stronger / more energy is required to overcome hydrogen bonding than van der Waals forces.
Boiling Points: PH₃ vs AsH₃
Explaining why the boiling temperature of PH₃ (−88 °C) is lower than that of AsH₃ (−63 °C)
✅ Model Answer
AsH₃ has more electrons than PH₃ (As has atomic number 33 vs P with 15).
Therefore, AsH₃ has stronger / more van der Waals forces between molecules, requiring more thermal energy to overcome.
💡 Key Knowledge
- Both PH₃ and AsH₃ have van der Waals forces as their primary intermolecular attraction.
- As you descend a group, atomic size and total electron count increase.
- More electrons = larger electron cloud = greater polarisability = stronger temporary induced dipoles.
🧠 Exam Technique
Always cite electron count rather than "molecular mass" or "size". WJEC mark schemes specifically look for the phrase "more electrons" leading to "stronger van der Waals forces".
❌ Common Errors
- Writing "AsH₃ is heavier" without referring to the number of electrons.
- Claiming AsH₃ forms dipole-dipole or hydrogen bonds.
• [1 Mark] AsH₃ has more electrons than PH₃.
• [1 Mark] More / stronger van der Waals forces in AsH₃ (than in PH₃).
VSEPR Theory & Shape of PH₃
Predicting shape, explaining via electron repulsion, and estimating bond angles
✅ Model Answer
- Electron count: Phosphorus has 5 outer electrons, forming 3 bonding pairs and 1 lone pair of electrons.
- Repulsion principle: Electron pairs repel and adopt positions of minimum repulsion (spread as far apart as possible).
- Molecular shape: Trigonal pyramidal (or pyramidal).
- Bond angle: 107° (or any value less than 109° / less than tetrahedral) because lone pair–bonding pair repulsion is greater than bonding pair–bonding pair repulsion.
💡 Key Knowledge & Diagramming
- Tetrahedral base: 4 total pairs give a tetrahedral electron geometry (approx. 109.5°).
- Lone pair effect: Each lone pair compresses bond angles by approximately 2°–2.5°.
- Drawing guidance: Central P with one lone pair (two dots or a lobe) on top; three H atoms below with one standard line, one wedged bond (pointing forward), and one dashed bond (receding into the page).
🧠 4-Step Answer Framework
- State total electron pairs: 3 BP + 1 LP .
- State the fundamental rule: electron pairs repel as far apart as possible.
- Name the 3D shape based solely on atom positions: pyramidal.
- State bond angle ( 107° ) and justify via lone pair repulsion.
❌ Common Errors
- Calling the shape "trigonal planar" (confusing it with BF₃, which has 3 BP and 0 LP).
- Giving an angle of 120° (planar angle) or exactly 109.5°.
- Forgetting to state that lone pairs repel more than bonding pairs.
• [1 Mark] PH₃ has three bonding pairs and one lone pair of electrons.
• [1 Mark] Electron pairs adopt position of minimum repulsion / move as far away from one another as possible.
• [1 Mark] Shape is (trigonal) pyramidal.
• [1 Mark] Bond angle is less than 109° / less than in a tetrahedral molecule / 107°.
Halide Identification & Critical Thinking
Evaluating qualitative observations for halide ions in solution
Part (c)(i) • Silver Nitrate Test (2 Marks)
Claim: Yellow precipitate means only iodide is present.
Judgment: Incorrect.
Justification: Although the yellow precipitate confirms the presence of silver iodide (AgI), any white precipitate (AgCl) or cream precipitate (AgBr) formed simultaneously would be masked / obscured by the intense yellow colour and cannot be seen clearly.
Part (c)(ii) • Bromine Water Test (2 Marks)
Claim: No colour change means the solution only contains bromide.
Judgment: Disagree.
Justification: While no change confirms iodide is absent (as Br₂ would oxidise I⁻ to brown I₂), chloride ions could also be present because bromine is not a strong enough oxidising agent to displace/oxidise chloride ions (no reaction occurs with Cl⁻ either).
💡 Halogen Displacement Rules
Oxidising ability decreases down Group 7:
Cl₂ > Br₂ > I₂
- Br₂ oxidises I⁻ → I₂ (orange/brown colour forms).
- Br₂ cannot oxidise Cl⁻ (solution remains orange Br₂; no reaction).
- Therefore, no colour change means I⁻ is absent, but tells you nothing about whether Cl⁻ is present!
🧠 Exam Technique: "Evaluate the Claim"
- Always start with an unambiguous Agree / Disagree or Correct / Incorrect.
- Credit in these questions relies on considering what is hidden:
• In (c)(i): darker precipitates hide paler ones.
• In (c)(ii): unreactive species produce no observable change.
• (c)(i): [1 Mark] Incorrect since the yellow precipitate is silver iodide; [1 Mark] Any precipitate due to AgCl or AgBr would not be seen clearly / masked.
• (c)(ii): [1 Mark] Disagree: no colour change rules out iodide, but chloride ions could also be present; [1 Mark] Bromine cannot oxidise / displace chloride ions.
Redox Identification & Oxidation States
2Cl₂ + 2H₂O → 4HCl + O₂
📐 Step-by-Step Oxidation State Tracking
1. Chlorine:
- In elemental Cl₂: oxidation state = 0
- In HCl: oxidation state = −1
- Change: 0 → −1 (gain of electrons → REDUCED)
2. Oxygen:
- In H₂O: oxidation state = −2
- In elemental O₂: oxidation state = 0
- Change: −2 → 0 (loss of electrons → OXIDISED)
✅ Model Answer
The reaction is a redox reaction because both oxidation and reduction occur:
- Oxygen is oxidised: It loses electrons, and its oxidation state increases from −2 in H₂O to 0 in O₂.
- Chlorine is reduced: It gains electrons, and its oxidation state decreases from 0 in Cl₂ to −1 in HCl.
🧠 Examiner Tip
To secure full marks on 2-mark redox questions, you must specify:
- Which element is oxidised AND its initial and final oxidation states (or mention of electron loss).
- Which element is reduced AND its initial and final oxidation states (or mention of electron gain).
❌ Common Errors
- Stating "water is oxidised" instead of naming the specific element: oxygen.
- Confusing signs, e.g. writing +2 instead of −2 for oxygen in water.
- Assuming this is a disproportionation reaction (it is NOT: chlorine only decreases its oxidation state; oxygen increases its state).
• [1 Mark] Oxygen loses electrons / oxidation state of oxygen changes from −2 to 0 therefore is oxidised.
• [1 Mark] Chlorine gains electrons / oxidation state of chlorine changes from 0 to −1 therefore is reduced.
(Partial credit: 1 mark awarded if correct oxidation states are given for both elements without assigning redox, OR if elements are correctly identified as oxidised/reduced without states).
Topics
Physical Chemistry · Inorganic Chemistry · 1.4 Bonding · 1.6 The Periodic Table · 1.1 Formulae and equations
Question and mark scheme from the WJEC A-Level Chemistry examination, AS Unit 1, June 2025. QuestionVault is an independent revision resource; questions remain the copyright of the awarding body.