AQA A-Level Chemistry Paper 1, 2017: Question 10
9 marks · Medium difficulty · State/Explain/Numerical
Use the standard electrode potentials table to deduce oxidation states of N in NO3- and NO, state the weakest reducing agent in the table, write the conventional cell representation for a cell with EMF +0.43 V, and identify an acid that will oxidise copper, give a balanced equation and calculate the EMF for that reaction.
Practise this questionQuestion
Question text
10 Table 4 shows some electrode half-equations and their standard electrode
potentials.
Table 4
Electrode half-equation Eο / V
Cl (g) + 2e− → 2Cl− (aq) +1.36
NO −(aq) + 4H+(aq) + 3e− → NO(aq) + 2H O(aq) +0.96
Fe3+ aq) + e−→ Fe3+(aq) +0.77
(
Cu2+(aq) + 2e− → Cu(s) +0.34
SO 2−(aq) + 4H+(aq) + 2e− → SO (g) + 2H O(aq) +0.17
42 2
2H+(aq) + 2e− → H (g) 0.00
Fe2+(aq) + 2e− → Fe(s) –0.44
10.1 Deduce the oxidation state of nitrogen in NO − and in NO
[2 marks]
Nitrogen in NO −
Nitrogen in NO
10.2 State the weakest reducing agent in Table 4.
[1 mark]
10.3 Write the conventional representation of the cell that has an EMF of +0.43 V
[2 marks]
Do
22 ou
10.4 Use data from Table 4 to identify an acid that will oxidise copper.
Explain your choice of acid.
Use these data to suggest a possible equation for the reaction.
Calculate the EMF of the cell that has the same overall reaction.
[4 marks]
Mark scheme
Show the mark scheme
Question Answers Mark Additional Comments/Guidance
(+) 5 1 Allow Roman numerals
10.1
(+) 2 1
Allow 2Cl-
10.2 Cl– / chloride (ions)
1 Do not allow chlorine / Cl / Cl2
Ignore (aq)
If not nitric acid then CE = 0
nitric acid / HNO3 1 -
If NO3 ions identified, lose M1 and mark on
Allow 0.96V > 0.34V
ο – ο 2+ 1 Allow NO – is a better oxidising agent than Cu2+
the E NO3 (/NO) > E Cu ( /Cu) or in words 3
Allow NO – has a more positive Eο than Cu2+
10.4 3
3Cu + 8H+ + 2NO − 3Cu2+ + 2NO + 4H O
32 1 Allow 3Cu + 8HNO3 3Cu(NO3)2+ 2NO + 4 H2O
EMF for the reaction is 0.62(V) 1
Total 9
How to answer it
Electrode Potentials: Oxidation States, Redox Choice & EMF
Skills & knowledge assessed
- Oxidation state calculation (including ions and neutral molecules).
- Interpreting E° values to rank oxidising/reducing strength.
- Choosing half-equations to match a target EMF.
- Constructing a conventional cell diagram.
- Using E° to justify an oxidising acid, writing the overall redox equation, and calculating EMF.
How marks are won
- Use the table exactly as given: all E° are standard reduction potentials.
- Pick cathode as the more positive E° reduction; anode is the other half reversed.
- State ions correctly (e.g. Cl⁻ not Cl₂).
- When justifying an oxidising agent: explicitly compare E° numbers.
Oxidation states of nitrogen in NO₃⁻ and NO
✅ Correct answers (as per mark scheme)
- N in NO₃⁻ = +5 (allow Roman numerals)
- N in NO = +2 (allow Roman numerals)
📐 Calculations (step-by-step)
- NO₃⁻: let oxidation state of N = x. Oxygen is −2 each.
- Sum equals ion charge: x + 3(−2) = −1
- x − 6 = −1 → x = +5
- NO: neutral molecule, sum = 0. Let N = x, O = −2.
- x + (−2) = 0 → x = +2
❌ Common errors
- Forgetting the overall charge on NO₃⁻ (using 0 instead of −1).
- Using −1 for oxygen (only true in peroxides like H₂O₂).
- Writing “5+” without sign clarity; always show +5, +2.
💡 Key knowledge
- O is usually −2 in compounds (except peroxides and with fluorine).
- The oxidation states in a species add up to its overall charge.
Weakest reducing agent in Table 4
✅ Correct answer (mark scheme)
Cl⁻ (aq) / chloride ions
Examiner note: Do not allow chlorine / Cl / Cl₂. Ignore state symbol (aq).
💡 Key knowledge (how to decide)
- Table values are reduction half-equations. The species on the right is the reduced form and can act as a reducing agent.
- The weaker the reducing agent, the less willing it is to be oxidised → it corresponds to a half-equation with a very positive E° (its oxidation would be very unfavourable).
- Cl₂ + 2e⁻ → 2Cl⁻ has E° = +1.36 V (very positive), so Cl⁻ is very hard to oxidise → weakest reducing agent here.
🧠 Exam technique
- For “reducing agent” in a reduction table: scan the right-hand species.
- Pick the one paired with the most positive E° (least likely to be oxidised).
- Write the exact ion asked for: Cl⁻, not “chlorine”.
❌ Common errors (explicitly flagged by mark scheme)
- Answering Cl₂: that’s the oxidising agent in the listed reduction half-equation, not the reducing agent.
- Answering “chlorine”/“Cl”: not an ion and not accepted.
Conventional cell representation for EMF = +0.43 V
💡 Key knowledge (finding the pair)
- E°cell = E°(cathode, reduction) − E°(anode, reduction).
- To get +0.43 V, look for two E° values with a difference of 0.43 V.
- From Table 4: +0.77 (Fe³⁺/Fe²⁺) and +0.34 (Cu²⁺/Cu) differ by 0.43.
- More positive reduction happens at the cathode: Fe³⁺ + e⁻ → Fe²⁺ is the cathode.
- The other half runs in reverse at the anode: Cu(s) → Cu²⁺ + 2e⁻.
✅ Correct cell diagram (what you should write)
One acceptable conventional representation:
Cu(s) | Cu²⁺(aq) || Fe³⁺(aq), Fe²⁺(aq) | Pt(s)
- Correct species in correct positions: anode on left, cathode on right.
- Correct use of salt bridge (||) and inert electrode where needed (Pt for Fe³⁺/Fe²⁺).
📐 EMF check (quick)
- Cathode E° = +0.77 V (Fe³⁺/Fe²⁺)
- Anode E° = +0.34 V (Cu²⁺/Cu)
- E°cell = 0.77 − 0.34 = +0.43 V
❌ Common errors
- Putting Fe³⁺/Fe²⁺ on the left: would reverse the sign of E°cell.
- Forgetting an inert electrode for Fe³⁺/Fe²⁺ (no solid conductor present) → include Pt(s).
- Using a comma incorrectly: use Fe³⁺(aq), Fe²⁺(aq) to show both ions present in the same half-cell.
- Using a single line instead of || for the salt bridge.
🧠 Exam technique (cell diagrams)
- Left = anode (oxidation), right = cathode (reduction) for a spontaneous cell with +EMF.
- Single | = phase boundary; double || = salt bridge.
- If a half-cell has only ions/gases, add an inert electrode: Pt(s) (or C/graphite, but Pt is standard).
Acid that oxidises copper: justify, write equation, calculate EMF
✅ Correct answers (mark scheme aligned)
- Acid: nitric acid, HNO₃ (must be nitric acid; “NO₃⁻ ions” alone loses the acid mark per guidance)
- Justification: E°(NO₃⁻/NO) = +0.96 V is more positive than E°(Cu²⁺/Cu) = +0.34 V
- Overall equation: 3Cu + 8H⁺ + 2NO₃⁻ → 3Cu²⁺ + 2NO + 4H₂O
- EMF: 0.62 V
- 1 mark: nitric acid / HNO₃
- 1 mark: clear E° comparison (0.96 V > 0.34 V, or “NO₃⁻ is a better oxidising agent than Cu²⁺”)
- 1 mark: a correct overall equation (one acceptable form shown below)
- 1 mark: EMF = 0.62 V
💡 Key knowledge (why nitric acid works)
- Copper is below hydrogen in the reactivity series, so it does not react with dilute HCl/H₂SO₄ to make H₂.
- To oxidise Cu(s) to Cu²⁺, you need an oxidising agent with a more positive reduction potential than Cu²⁺/Cu.
- In nitric acid, the oxidising species is NO₃⁻ in acidic conditions (NO₃⁻ + 4H⁺ + 3e⁻ → NO + 2H₂O, E° = +0.96 V).
📐 Calculations (step-by-step): overall equation + EMF
A) Build the overall reaction
- Oxidation (reverse copper reduction):
Cu(s) → Cu²⁺(aq) + 2e⁻ - Reduction (given):
NO₃⁻(aq) + 4H⁺(aq) + 3e⁻ → NO(aq) + 2H₂O(aq) - Balance electrons (LCM of 2 and 3 is 6):
3Cu(s) → 3Cu²⁺(aq) + 6e⁻
2NO₃⁻(aq) + 8H⁺(aq) + 6e⁻ → 2NO(aq) + 4H₂O(aq) - Add and cancel electrons:
3Cu + 8H⁺ + 2NO₃⁻ → 3Cu²⁺ + 2NO + 4H₂O
B) Calculate EMF for the same overall reaction
- E°(cathode) = E° for NO₃⁻/NO = +0.96 V
- E°(anode) = E° for Cu²⁺/Cu = +0.34 V (still use reduction value in the subtraction)
- E°cell = 0.96 − 0.34 = 0.62 V
🧠 Exam technique (what to write to secure each mark)
- Acid mark: write “nitric acid (HNO₃)”. If you only say “nitrate ions”, you risk losing that mark (mark scheme guidance).
- Justification mark: explicitly compare the E° values: “0.96 V > 0.34 V”. A simple statement like “it has a higher E°” must clearly reference the correct couples.
- Equation mark: show the balanced redox equation in acidic conditions (H⁺ and H₂O included). If you instead write a molecular equation, ensure it matches an allowed form (see below).
- EMF mark: show the subtraction in the correct direction: E°(cathode) − E°(anode).
❌ Common errors (and why they lose marks)
- Choosing HCl / H₂SO₄: these provide H⁺ but not a strong enough oxidising agent to oxidise Cu under standard conditions.
- Wrong comparison: comparing NO₃⁻/NO to H⁺/H₂ (0.00 V) instead of to Cu²⁺/Cu (+0.34 V) misses the point of oxidising copper.
- Sign error in EMF: doing 0.34 − 0.96 = −0.62 V (this would imply a non-spontaneous cell).
- Unbalanced overall equation: especially H and O in acidic solution—use H⁺ and H₂O methodically.
- State confusion: mark scheme shows NO as (aq) in the half-equation; examiners typically accept correct chemistry even if you write NO(g), but don’t change species identity.
🧠 30-second check before moving on
- Oxidation states: sums correct with charge? (NO₃⁻ must sum to −1)
- Reducing agent: chosen from RHS species; is it the weakest (most positive E° pair)?
- Cell diagram: anode left, cathode right, || present, Pt included if only ions.
- EMF: cathode − anode; values copied correctly from table.
✅ Answers recap
- 10.1: N in NO₃⁻ = +5; N in NO = +2
- 10.2: weakest reducing agent = Cl⁻
- 10.3: cell with +0.43 V: Cu(s)|Cu²⁺ || Fe³⁺,Fe²⁺|Pt
- 10.4: acid = HNO₃; equation as given; EMF = 0.62 V
Topics
Physical Chemistry · Inorganic Chemistry · 3.1.11 Electrode Potentials · 3.1.7 Oxidation, Reduction and Redox Equations · 3.1.12 Acids and Bases
Question and mark scheme from the AQA A-Level Chemistry examination, Paper 1, 2017. QuestionVault is an independent revision resource; questions remain the copyright of the awarding body.