AQA A-Level Chemistry Paper 1, 2017: Question 11
14 marks · Hard difficulty · State/Explain/Numerical
Calculate the percentage by mass of sodium ethanedioate in the white solid from two titrations, and answer related short questions on the ligand substitution reaction with Fe(III), the structure and isomerism of the iron–ethanedioate complex, and why ethanedioate in foods is not poisonous.
Practise this questionQuestion
Question text
11 This question is about compounds containing ethanedioate ions.
11.1 A white solid is a mixture of sodium ethanedioate (Na2C2O4), ethanedioic acid
dihydrate (H2C2O4.2H2O) and an inert solid. A volumetric flask contained
1.90 g of this solid mixture in 250 cm3 of aqueous solution.
Two different titrations were carried out using this solution.
In the first titration 25.0 cm3 of the solution were added to an excess of sulfuric
acid in a conical flask. The flask and contents were heated to 60 oC and then
titrated with a 0.0200 mol dm−3 solution of potassium manganate(VII). When
26.50 cm3 of potassium manganate(VII) had been added the solution changed
colour.
The equation for this reaction is
2MnO − + 5C O 2− + 16H+ → 2Mn2+ + 8H O + 10CO
42 4 2 2
In the second titration 25.0 cm3 of the solution were titrated with a
0.100 mol dm−3 solution of sodium hydroxide using phenolphthalein as an
indicator. The indicator changed colour after the addition of 10.45 cm3 of
sodium hydroxide solution.
The equation for this reaction is
H C O + 2OH− → C O 2− + 2H O
22 4 2 4 2
Calculate the percentage by mass of sodium ethanedioate in the white solid.
Give your answer to the appropriate number of significant figures.
Show your working.
[8 marks]
D
Percentage by mass of sodium ethanedioate25 %
11.2 Ethanedioate ions react with aqueous iron(III) ions in a ligand substitution
reaction.
*24* Write an equation for this reaction.
Suggest why the value of the enthalpy change for this reaction is close to zero.
[2 marks]
11.3 Draw the displayed formula of the iron complex produced in the reaction in
Question 11.2
Indicate the value of the O—Fe—O bond angle.
State the type of isomerism shown by the iron complex.
[3 marks]
Bond angle
Type of isomerism
11.4 Ethanedioate ions are poisonous because they react with iron ions in the body.
Ethanedioate ions are present in foods such as broccoli and spinach.
Suggest one reason why people who eat these foods do not suffer from
poisoning.
[1 mark]
Mark scheme
Show the mark scheme
Question Answers Mark Additional Comments/Guidance
- 26.50 x 0.02 -4 The first CE is penalised by 2 marks; further errors are
Moles Mn O4 = 5.30 ×10 1
1000 penalised by one mark each
Moles in 25cm3 sample / pipette C O 2– ( from acid and salt)
–4 –3 1 M2 = M1 x 5/2
= 5.30 x 10 x 5/2 = (1.325 x 10 )
10.45 × 0.1 -3
Moles NaOH = (= 1.045 × 10 ) 1
1000
So moles C O 2– from acid in 25cm3 sample / pipette
24 1 M4 = M3 ÷ 2
= 1.045 x 10–3 ÷ 2 = 5.225 x 10–4
M5 = M2 – M4 (do not allow if negative and do not allow = M4-
M2)
2– 3 1 If no subtraction, max = 5 (M1, M2, M3, M4 and M6)
11.1 Hence moles C2O4 in sodium ethanedioate in 25 cm
= 1.325 x 10–3 – 5.225 x 10–4 (= 8.025x 10–4) If incorrect subtraction, max = 6 (M1, M2, M3, M4, M6 and
M7)
So moles C O 2– in sodium ethanedioate in original sample 1 M6 = M5 x 10
= 8.025x 10–4 x 10 (= 8.025x 10–3) (M6 can be scored by multiplying M2 and M4 by 10 before
subtraction (giving 1.325x10-2 – 5.225x10-3 = 8.025x10-3 )
Mass Na C O = 8.025x10–3 x 134(.0) = 1.075(35) g 1 M7 = M6 x 134
22 4
So % sodium ethanedioate in original sample – – –
1.075(35) 1 M8 = (M7/1.90)x100 Allow 56.5 – 56.8%
×100 = 56.6 % to 3 sig fig
1.90
Question Answers Mark Additional Comments/Guidance 33 of 35
[Fe(H O) ]3+ + 3C O 2– [Fe(C O ) ]3– + 6H O 1
26 2 4 2 4 3 2
11.2 There are 6 Fe –O bonds broken and then made / same
number and type of bond being broken and made.
Ignore all charges even if wrong
1 Ignore absence of square brackets
11.3 Candidates do not need to show 3D shape
90o or 180o 1
optical 1
The ethanedioic acid is only present in small quantities/low
11.4 1
concentration in these foods.
Total 14
How to answer it
Mixed titrations: oxalate(ethanedioate) by redox + acid–base, then Fe(III) complex
Skills & knowledge
- Using two titrations to separate contributions from a salt vs an acid (subtraction strategy).
- Redox stoichiometry with MnO₄⁻ and C₂O₄²⁻ in acidic conditions (heated).
- Acid–base stoichiometry for H₂C₂O₄ with NaOH (2:1 ratio).
- Scaling from 25.0 cm³ aliquot to 250 cm³ and converting moles → mass → %.
- Ligand substitution in complexes; why ΔH is close to 0; geometry & isomerism.
Exam focus
- Track what each titration measures: total ethanedioate vs ethanedioate from the acid only.
- Use the given balanced equations to get mole ratios.
- Write units every line (cm³→dm³) and use correct significant figures.
Part 11.1 (8 marks): % by mass of sodium ethanedioate, Na₂C₂O₄
Two titrations are used to separate ethanedioate from the acid vs from the sodium salt
💡 Key knowledge (what each titration measures)
- KMnO₄ redox titration measures total C₂O₄²⁻ present after acidifying: this includes C₂O₄²⁻ that comes from both Na₂C₂O₄ and H₂C₂O₄ (once deprotonated in acidic medium, it is still the same ethanedioate skeleton being oxidised).
- NaOH titration measures only H₂C₂O₄ present (it’s an acid–base neutralisation). From that you can calculate the moles of C₂O₄²⁻ that originated from the acid.
- Then: (total C₂O₄²⁻) − (C₂O₄²⁻ from acid) = C₂O₄²⁻ from Na₂C₂O₄.
🧠 Exam technique (how to score full marks)
- Do the redox moles first: n = cV with V in dm³ .
- Use the ratio from the equation: 2 MnO₄⁻ : 5 C₂O₄²⁻ so multiply by 5/2 .
- For NaOH: H₂C₂O₄ + 2OH⁻ → C₂O₄²⁻ + 2H₂O , so n(C₂O₄²⁻ from acid) = n(OH⁻)/2 .
- Only at the end: scale ×10 (25.0 cm³ → 250 cm³), then convert to mass, then %.
📐 Calculations (step-by-step, with mark breakdown)
Given data
- Volumetric flask: 250 cm³ contains 1.90 g mixture
- Aliquot used each titration: 25.0 cm³
- KMnO₄: 0.0200 mol dm⁻³, titre = 26.50 cm³
- NaOH: 0.100 mol dm⁻³, titre = 10.45 cm³
- Moles of MnO₄⁻ used (1 mark)
n = cV = 0.0200 × (26.50/1000) = 5.30 × 10⁻⁴ mol - Moles of C₂O₄²⁻ in 25.0 cm³ (total from acid + salt) using
2MnO₄⁻ + 5C₂O₄²⁻ + 16H⁺ → 2Mn²⁺ + 8H₂O + 10CO₂ (1 mark)
Ratio: MnO₄⁻ : C₂O₄²⁻ = 2 : 5
n(C₂O₄²⁻) = 5.30 × 10⁻⁴ × (5/2) = 1.325 × 10⁻³ mol - Moles of NaOH used (1 mark)
n(OH⁻) = 0.100 × (10.45/1000) = 1.045 × 10⁻³ mol - Moles of C₂O₄²⁻ coming from H₂C₂O₄ in 25.0 cm³ (1 mark)
From H₂C₂O₄ + 2OH⁻ → C₂O₄²⁻ + 2H₂O
n(C₂O₄²⁻ from acid) = 1.045 × 10⁻³ ÷ 2 = 5.225 × 10⁻⁴ mol - Moles of C₂O₄²⁻ from Na₂C₂O₄ in 25.0 cm³ (subtraction) (1 mark)
= (total) − (from acid)
= 1.325 × 10⁻³ − 5.225 × 10⁻⁴ = 8.025 × 10⁻⁴ mol - Moles of Na₂C₂O₄ in original 250 cm³ (scale factor ×10) (1 mark)
n = 8.025 × 10⁻⁴ × 10 = 8.025 × 10⁻³ mol - Mass of Na₂C₂O₄ (Mᵣ = 134.0) (1 mark)
m = nMᵣ = 8.025 × 10⁻³ × 134.0 = 1.07535 g - % by mass of Na₂C₂O₄ in the 1.90 g mixture (1 mark)
% = (1.07535 / 1.90) × 100 = 56.6% (3 s.f.)
✅ Correct answer (with accepted range)
Percentage by mass of sodium ethanedioate = 56.6% (3 s.f.)
Mark scheme allows 56.5%–56.8%.
❌ Common errors (that lose marks fast)
- Forgetting cm³ → dm³ (divide volumes by 1000).
- Using the wrong redox ratio: it is 2 MnO₄⁻ to 5 C₂O₄²⁻, so multiply moles of MnO₄⁻ by 5/2.
- Not halving the NaOH moles: H₂C₂O₄ needs 2OH⁻ per 1 acid molecule.
- Subtracting the wrong way round: you must do (total ethanedioate) − (ethanedioate from acid). A negative value signals a logic error.
- Scaling error: 25.0 cm³ to 250 cm³ is ×10 (not ×1000).
- Significant figures: final % should reflect given data (typically 3 s.f.).
🧠 Examiner-style commentary (what distinguishes top answers)
- Top answers make it explicit that the KMnO₄ titration gives total C₂O₄²⁻, while NaOH isolates the contribution from H₂C₂O₄ only, then clearly show the subtraction step.
- Many students lose marks by treating the two titrations as independent and never combining them (or combining without clear reasoning).
- Clear, line-by-line units and ratios helps prevent “carry-forward” mistakes.
Part 11.2 (2 marks): Ligand substitution with Fe(III)
✅ Correct equation (1 mark)
[Fe(H₂O)₆]³⁺ + 3C₂O₄²⁻ → [Fe(C₂O₄)₃]³⁻ + 6H₂O
Marking: must show ligand substitution on the hexaaqua iron(III) ion and correct stoichiometry (3 ethanedioate ligands replace 6 waters).
💡 Why ΔH is close to zero (1 mark)
- Approximately the same number and same type of bonds are broken and made (Fe–O bonds to water are replaced by Fe–O bonds to ethanedioate).
- So energy required ≈ energy released → ΔH ≈ 0.
❌ Common errors
- Writing a redox equation (this is ligand substitution, not electron transfer).
- Forgetting that ethanedioate is bidentate: 3 ligands are needed to make a coordination number 6 complex.
- Incorrect overall charge on the complex ions.
Part 11.3 (3 marks): Displayed formula, bond angle, and isomerism of the iron complex
✅ Displayed formula to draw (1 mark)
The complex is [Fe(C₂O₄)₃]³⁻ .
- Central Fe with three ethanedioate ligands.
- Each ethanedioate should be drawn as −OOC–COO− (two carboxylate groups) and shown coordinating via two O atoms to Fe (bidentate chelate ring).
- Show the complex in square brackets with overall charge 3− (the mark scheme notes charges/brackets may be ignored, but correct is best).
✅ O—Fe—O bond angle (1 mark)
90° or 180°
Reason: octahedral complex → adjacent ligands 90°, opposite 180°.
✅ Type of isomerism (1 mark)
Optical isomerism
Tris-bidentate octahedral complexes like [Fe(C₂O₄)₃]³⁻ can be chiral (non-superimposable mirror images).
🧠 Exam technique (drawing tips)
- You do not need perfect 3D wedges unless asked; clarity that each ligand is bidentate is the key scoring feature.
- Make it obvious there are 6 coordinate bonds total (2 from each ethanedioate).
- If you include charges, keep them consistent: Fe is +3, each C₂O₄²⁻ is 2−, so overall is 3−.
❌ Common errors
- Drawing ethanedioate as monodentate (only one O attached) → loses the displayed structure mark.
- Stating cis–trans isomerism (not the key isomerism here for tris-bidentate).
- Giving 109.5° (tetrahedral) instead of 90°/180° (octahedral).
Part 11.4 (1 mark): Why foods containing ethanedioate ions don’t usually cause poisoning
✅ Correct suggestion (1 mark)
Ethanedioic acid/ethanedioate is present only in small quantities / at low concentration in these foods, so the dose is too low to cause poisoning.
🧠 Exam technique
- This is a one-mark question: give one clear, simple point (dose/concentration) rather than multiple vague ideas.
❌ Common errors
- Overcomplicating with digestion/metabolism without linking to a mark-scheme-friendly point.
- Claiming it is “neutralised completely” without evidence or a specific process.
Quick checklist before you move on
💡 Must-know ratios
- 2 MnO₄⁻ : 5 C₂O₄²⁻ (acidic redox)
- H₂C₂O₄ : OH⁻ = 1 : 2 (neutralisation)
- 25.0 cm³ → 250 cm³ is ×10
🧠 High-score structure
- Compute totals → compute acid contribution → subtract → scale up → mass → %.
- Keep each line to one idea, with units.
✅ Final numeric answer to remember
56.6% Na₂C₂O₄ by mass (allowed ~56.5–56.8%).
Topics
Physical Chemistry · Inorganic Chemistry · 3.1.2 Amount of Substance · 3.1.4 Energetics · 3.1.7 Oxidation, Reduction and Redox Equations · 3.2.5 Transition Metals · 3.2.6 Reactions of Ions in Aqueous Solution · 3.3.1 Introduction to Organic Chemistry
Question and mark scheme from the AQA A-Level Chemistry examination, Paper 1, 2017. QuestionVault is an independent revision resource; questions remain the copyright of the awarding body.