AQA A-Level English Literature A Paper 2: Texts in shared contexts (2B), June 2025: Question 15

25 marks · Hard difficulty · Extended Response

Examine the significance of the novel's title, The Handmaid's Tale.

Practise this question

Question

Question 15 on Margaret Atwood's 'The Handmaid's Tale' asking students to: 'Examine the significance of the novel’s title, The Handmaid’s Tale.' The question is worth 25 marks.
Question text

The Handmaid’s Tale – Margaret Atwood

or

15 Examine the significance of the novel’s title, The Handmaid’s Tale.

[25 marks]

Mark scheme

Show the mark scheme Mark scheme for Question 15 outlining assessment objectives AO1 to AO5. Indicative content includes: analysis of 'tale' as an oral narrative or fairy tale; Offred's recording of cassette tapes; the postscript 'Historical Notes' and Professor Pieixoto's naming in homage to Chaucer; epigraph references to the Book of Genesis; first-person perspective versus patriarchal reconstruction; and genre conventions of dystopia.

Question 15

The Handmaid’s Tale – Margaret Atwood

Examine the significance of the novel’s title, The Handmaid’s Tale.

[25 marks]

Possible content:

Please refer to pages 4 to 7.

AO5 Explore literary texts informed by different interpretations

Focus might be on:

• the idea of a ‘tale’ being a specific kind of oral narrative often associated with women, and

containing ideas about fairy tales and old wives’ tales

• that as the handmaids are forbidden to read and write, and Offred is in fact recording her memories

and impressions of Gilead onto a batch of old cassette tapes, this is an oral narrative in the female

tradition

• that storytelling and the power of stories is a major theme within the text

• the function of the ‘Historical Notes’ as a postscript to Offred’s narrative; the explanation of the

Gileadean system and the reconstruction of Offred’s story by Professor Pieixoto

• the impact of Pieixoto’s revelation that he collated and edited Offred’s story, and then named it

‘The Handmaid’s Tale’ in homage to Chaucer

• the importance of the epigraph taken from the Book of Genesis which details the relationships

between sisters Leah and Rachel, the official wives of the patriarch Jacob, and their handmaids

Bilhah and Zilpah, whose children by Jacob are claimed by the wives as their own; the fact that the

Gileadean system of state surrogacy is based on this Old Testament story

• ideas about different types of narrative: the fact that Offred herself states that her narrative is

unreliable – ‘it didn’t happen that way. This is how it happened’

• the idea that the text is a first-person account of the Gileadean regime from the viewpoint of a

typical handmaid

• that in calling the book The Handmaid’s Tale rather than A Handmaid’s Tale, Pieixoto

paradoxically elevates Offred and her status within the text

• possible mention of how the narrative is constructed in Atwood’s sequel to the novel, The

Testaments, in which the narrative is split three ways

• etc.

AO4 Explore connections across literary texts

Focus might be on:

• prose representations of gender, power and patriarchy as seen in modern literature, perhaps with a

focus on the dystopian genre

• etc.

AO3 Demonstrate understanding of the significance and influence of the contexts in which

literary texts are written and received

Focus might be on:

• the ways in which narrative methods are an integral part of strengthening the novel’s presentation

of gender, power and patriarchy

40• etc.

AO2 Analyse ways in which meanings are shaped in literary texts

Focus might be on:

• aspects of narrative form and genre

• aspects of the ways in which Atwood has structured the text, eg the narrative stance of Offred and

the privileging of her viewpoint

• language effects eg dialogue and description

• etc.

AO1 Articulate informed, personal and creative responses to literary texts, using associated

concepts and terminology, and coherent, accurate written expression

• quality of argument

• organisation of ideas

• use of appropriate concepts and terminology

• technical accuracy.

Accept any valid interpretations, any valid comments on contexts and any valid discussion of

authorial methods.

How to answer it

AQA A-Level English Literature A • Paper 2

The Handmaid's Tale: The Significance of the Novel's Title

What this question tests

This question assesses your ability to conduct a focused, multi-layered critical exploration of how Atwood constructs meaning through the titular naming of her text [25 marks].

  • AO1 (Argument & Expression): Structuring a conceptual, cohesive thesis analyzing the grammatical, thematic, and meta-fictional layers of the title.
  • AO2 (Authorial Methods): Exploring narrative framing, oral vs. written discourse, irony, and the postscript structure (the Historical Notes).
  • AO3 (Contextual Significance): Connecting the title to patriarchal hegemony, Biblical fundamentalism (Genesis 30:1–3), and 1980s political/religious backlashes.
  • AO4 (Literary Connections & Genre): Engaging with dystopian conventions and medieval Chaucerian frame narratives (The Canterbury Tales).
  • AO5 (Debatable Interpretations): Evaluating whether the title represents an act of reclamation of female voice or patriarchal patronisation and editorial erasure by Professor Pieixoto.

Question 15: Deconstructing the Title

"Examine the significance of the novel's title, The Handmaid's Tale." [25 marks]

💡 Key Knowledge: Multi-Layered Facets of the Title

  • Chaucerian Allusion: In the Historical Notes, Professor Pieixoto admits he titled the manuscript in homage to Geoffrey Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales (e.g., The Miller's Tale, The Wife of Bath's Tale). This frames Offred's harrowing survival as a quaint, archaized piece of academic folklore.
  • The Pun on "Tale" / "Tail": Pieixoto crudely jokes about the homophone "tail" (archaic slang for female genitalia), revealing that even in 2195, male-dominated academia trivialises and sexualises female suffering.
  • Biblical Origin of "Handmaid": Rooted in the Genesis epigraph (Rachel and Bilhah). Gilead appropriates biblical nomenclature to sanitise state-sanctioned ritualised rape as holy service.
  • Oral Tradition & "Old Wives' Tales": A "tale" implies an oral narrative, fairy tale, or fiction. Because Handmaids were forbidden to read or write, Offred dictated onto cassette tapes. Her story is literally an oral survivor's testimony, yet calling it a "tale" threatens to cast doubt on its factual veracity.
  • The Definite Article "The" vs "A": "The" suggests Offred is elevated as an archetypal representative for all silenced women; paradoxically, it simultaneously strips her of individual identity, reducing her to her functional caste.

🧠 Exam Technique: Structuring a Band 5 (Top Level) Essay

  • Immediate Framing: Reveal in your introduction that the title is not given by Offred, but posthumously imposed by a male academic (Pieixoto). This instantly elevates your response into high-level AO2/AO5 territory.
  • Break Down the Terms: Devote distinct, interconnected paragraphs to:
    1. The biblical noun Handmaid (theocratic oppression and reduction to biological function).
    2. The noun Tale (oral resistance vs. patronising dismissal / Chaucerian intertextuality).
    3. The framing structure (the irony of the Historical Notes).
  • Integrate Voice and Reliability: Link the word "tale" to Offred's own meta-fictional admissions: "This is a reconstruction" and "It didn't happen that way" .

✅ High-Scoring Thematic Arguments (AO1 / AO2 / AO5)

Argument 1: The Title as Patriarchal Appropriation & Meta-fictional Frame

The most critical insight is that the title is an editorial artifact. Offred never names her story; Professor Pieixoto titles it in 2195. By framing it as a Chaucerian pastiche ( "partly in homage to the great Geoffrey Chaucer" ), Pieixoto neutralises Offred's political urgency, aestheticising her trauma into academic curiosity. The bawdy innuendo on "tail" unmasks the enduring nature of misogyny across centuries, proving that post-Gileadean society still commodifies women's bodies.

Argument 2: Biblical Subversion & The Depersonalisation of "The Handmaid"

The title directly invokes the epigraph from Genesis 30:1–3, where Rachel commands Jacob to impregnate her maid Bilhah: "she shall bear upon my knees, that I may also have children by her." By adopting Gilead's state title rather than her real name (which remains unspoken or coded as "June"), the title reflects how totalitarian regimes erase personal identity. Yet, by calling it The Handmaid's Tale rather than A Handmaid's Tale, Atwood creates an ironic tension: Offred is transformed into the singular, universal voice for all Gilead's voiceless victims.

Argument 3: The "Tale" as Oral Resistance and Subversive Fiction

Because literacy was an act of treason punishable by amputation for women in Gilead, Offred's "tale" could only survive through the oral tradition—recorded over commercial pop cassette songs (like Elvis Presley and Boy George). The title signifies feminine storytelling as an act of rebellion. Furthermore, Offred acknowledges the performative instability of her tale ( "If it's a story I'm telling, then I have control over the ending" ). A "tale" implies storytelling, memory, and fabrication, resisting the rigid, totalitarian dogma of Gilead's written, state-enforced decrees.

Examiner Insight: Pitfalls & Distinctions

❌ Common Errors That Cap Marks

  • Treating the title as Atwood's literal label: Forgetting that Pieixoto chose the title within the narrative universe of the novel.
  • Writing a general character essay on Offred: Drifting away from the question into a broad recounting of Offred's suffering, Commander Waterford, or Nick without tying points back to the signifiers "Handmaid" and "Tale".
  • Ignoring the Historical Notes: Failing to mention the closing academic conference in Nunavit, which provides the crucial structural context for the title.
  • Ignoring the Genesis epigraph: Missing the foundational theocratic context of the label "Handmaid".

📐 What Distinguishes Level 5 / Band 5 Responses

  • Linguistic Precision: Close semantic analysis of the words (the definite article "The", the possessive apostrophe "Handmaid's", the connotations of "Tale" vs "History" or "Account").
  • Structural Integration: Directly linking the title to Atwood's framed narrative architecture (Offred's raw, fractured present-tense tape recordings vs. the clinical, detached future-historicist symposium).
  • Nuanced AO5: Balancing whether the title acts as a trivialising label that re-silences the narrator, or an ironic badge of female survival that outlives the regime of Gilead.
Mark Scheme Alignment (25 Marks Total): Assessed across AO1 (5 marks), AO2 (5 marks), AO3 (5 marks), AO4 (5 marks), and AO5 (5 marks). High bands require sustained analytical focus on authorial construction and debate.

Topics

Modern times: literature from 1945 to the present day · The Handmaid’s Tale

Question and mark scheme from the AQA A-Level English Literature A examination, Paper 2: Texts in shared contexts (2B), June 2025. QuestionVault is an independent revision resource; questions remain the copyright of the awarding body.