AQA A-Level History AS Component 1 (1A), June 2025: Question 3
25 marks · Hard difficulty · Extended Response
Explain why you agree or disagree with the view that in the years 1127 to 1144, Zengi used ideas of jihad to unite the Muslim world.
Practise this questionQuestion
Question text
03 ‘In the years 1127 to 1144, Zengi used ideas of jihad to unite the Muslim world.’
Explain why you agree or disagree with this view.
[25 marks]
Mark scheme
Show the mark scheme
03 ‘In the years 1127 to 1144, Zengi used ideas of jihad to unite the Muslim world.’
Explain why you agree or disagree with this view.
[25 marks]
Target: AO1
Demonstrate, organise and communicate knowledge and understanding to analyse and evaluate
the key features related to the periods studied, making substantiated judgements and exploring
concepts, as relevant, of cause, consequence, change, continuity, similarity, difference and
significance.
Generic Mark Scheme
L5: Answers will display a good understanding of the demands of the question. They will be
well-organised and effectively communicated. There will be a range of clear and specific
supporting information showing a good understanding of key features and issues, together with
some conceptual awareness. The answer will be analytical in style with a range of direct
comment leading to substantiated judgement. 21–25
L4: Answers will show an understanding of the question and will supply a range of largely accurate
information which will show an awareness of some of the key issues and features. The answer
will be effectively organised and show adequate communication skills. There will be analytical
comment in relation to the question and the answer will display some balance. However, there
may be some generalisation and judgements will be limited and only partially substantiated.
16–20
L3: The answer will show some understanding of the full demands of the question and the answer
will be adequately organised. There will be appropriate information showing an understanding of
some key features and/or issues but the answer may be limited in scope and/or contain
inaccuracy and irrelevance. There will be some comment in relation to the question. 11–15
L2: The answer will be descriptive or partial, showing some awareness of the question but a failure to
grasp its full demands. There will be some attempt to convey material in an organised way
although communication skills may be limited. There will be some appropriate information
showing understanding of some key features and/or issues, but the answer may be very limited in
scope and/or contain inaccuracy and irrelevance. There will be some, but limited, comment in
relation to the question and statements will, for the most part, be unsupported and generalist.
6–10
L1: The question has not been properly understood and the response shows limited organisational
and communication skills. The information conveyed is irrelevant or extremely limited. There
may be some unsupported, vague or generalist comment.– AS HISTORY – 7041/1A – 1–5
Nothing worthy of credit. 0
Indicative content
Note: This content is not prescriptive and students are not obliged to refer to the material
contained in this mark scheme. Any legitimate answer will be assessed on its merits according
to the generic levels scheme.
Arguments supporting the view that in the years 1127 to 1144, Zengi used ideas of jihad to unite
the Muslim world might include:
• Zengi promoted ideas of jihad against the Christian invaders to unite Muslims against them and was
recognised as the champion of Islam by the Caliph of Baghdad for his capture of Edessa in 1144 9
• Zengi built a series of madrasas and khanqahs to spread the idea of jihad and create a new
generation of warriors for the jihad
• Zengi’s religious policy was so successful that his son, Nureddin, continued it after Zengi’s death in
1146.
Arguments challenging the view that in the years 1127 to 1144, Zengi used ideas of jihad to unite
the Muslim world might include:
• Zengi fought against his co-religionists more than he fought against the Christians, for example, his
multiple attempts to seize Damascus from Unur
• Zengi used terror to unite his troops more than ideas of jihad, for example, his alleged beheading of
troops that could not march in a straight line. His use of terror led to his own assassination
• Zengi was not effective in uniting the Muslim world, Muslims still made alliances with Christian powers,
eg Damascus and Jerusalem.
The question allows students to decide whether it was Zengi’s promotion of jihad as a deliberate tactic to
unite the Muslim East or whether it was his success as a military leader and the fear this inspired that
was the key factor in uniting the Muslim world. Alternatively, students might seek to debate the extent to
which Zengi united the Muslim world. Any valid approach will be rewarded using the generic levels and
students could consider a mix of approaches.
How to answer it
Zengi and the Use of Jihad (1127–1144)
What this question tests
Assessment Objective AO1: Your ability to recall, select, and deploy historical knowledge of the Muslim Near East (1127–1144), structure a balanced analytical argument, and reach a sustained, substantiated judgement on whether Zengi was motivated by religious jihad or self-serving political ambition.
Question 03 Analysis & Mark Breakdown
'In the years 1127 to 1144, Zengi used ideas of jihad to unite the Muslim world.' Explain why you agree or disagree with this view. [25 marks]
- Level 5 (21–25 marks): Clear, analytical focus; extensive and accurate supporting evidence; fully substantiated judgement comparing motives, methods, and outcomes.
- Level 4 (16–20 marks): Balanced argument with good historical context; analytical commentary present, though conclusion may rely on slight generalisations.
- Level 3 (11–15 marks): Adequately organised with narrative/descriptive passages; some range of accurate detail, but lacks sharp conceptual analysis or sustained balance.
- Level 2/1 (1–10 marks): Assertive, one-sided, or thin factual coverage with major chronological slips.
Building a Balanced Historical Argument
Deconstructing the core debate: Holy Warrior (Mujahid) vs Brutal Secular Warlord
✅ Agree: Arguments Supporting the View
- Capture of Edessa (1144): Zengi captured the first Crusader State capital, eliminating a Frankish salient. This military victory was hailed across the Levant as the first great Islamic counter-stroke.
- Caliphal Acclaim & Titles: The Abbasid Caliph in Baghdad bestowed high religious titles upon him, such as al-Malik al-Mansur (The Victorious King) and 'Ornament of Islam', endorsing him as the champion of Sunni orthodoxy.
- Religious Infrastructure: Zengi sponsored madrasas (religious colleges) and khanqahs (Sufi convents) in Mosul and Aleppo to foster an ideological revival of jihad and cultivate religious fighters.
- Legacy for Nur ad-Din: Created the ideological blueprint and political power base that allowed his son, Nur ad-Din, to successfully champion counter-crusade propaganda.
⚖️ Disagree: Arguments Challenging the View
- Intra-Muslim Conflict: Zengi directed the vast majority of his military campaigns against rival Muslims rather than Franks—notably besieging Damascus repeatedly (e.g., 1135, 1139–1140).
- Muslim-Frankish Alliances: His aggressive expansion forced Mu'in ad-Din Unur of Damascus to ally with King Fulk of Jerusalem in 1140 to defend against Zengi, actively dividing the Muslim world.
- Rule by Terror, Not Devotion: Maintained discipline through extreme brutality (e.g., castrating and executing soldiers who broke line, savagely crucifying enemies) rather than spiritual inspiration.
- Opportunistic Motives: Edessa was attacked in 1144 primarily because Count Joscelin II was absent and quarrelling with Raymond of Antioch, not solely out of an orchestrated grand jihad.
Analytical Framework & Essay Plan
How to structure your answer for Level 5 (21–25 marks)
📐 Step-by-Step Thematic Structure
- Introduction: Define the terms jihad (spiritual/military counter-crusade) and unity. State your thesis clearly: Zengi used jihad rhetoric opportunistically and selectively as a tool of political legitimisation, while his core drive was dynastic territorial expansion through terror.
- Theme 1: Ideological Promotion & the Fall of Edessa (1144): Discuss the religious patronage in Aleppo and Mosul, court chroniclers (Ibn al-Athir), and the seismic psychological impact of Edessa's fall.
- Theme 2: Intra-Muslim Warfare & Disunity: Contrast jihadist rhetoric with the reality of his attacks on Homs, Hama, and Damascus, proving that his actions deepened Muslim fracture lines.
- Theme 3: Methods of Control (Terror vs Faith): Contrast moral religious appeal with his draconian martial discipline and personal ruthlessness. Note his death in 1144/1146 by his own slave (Yarankash).
- Conclusion: Weigh up motive vs effect. Conclude that while Zengi successfully united Aleppo and Mosul under the banner of jihad, he was an opportunistic autocrat whose pursuit of personal power alienated Damascus and kept the Muslim Levant divided.
| Factor | Evidence of Jihad / Unity | Evidence of Personal Ambition / Division |
|---|---|---|
| Aleppo & Mosul | Unified the two key northern cities (1127–1128), preventing Frankish encroachment. | Used as a personal hereditary power base (Zangid dynasty). |
| Damascus | Claimed he needed Damascus to create a unified front against Jerusalem. | Attacked fellow Muslims; forced Unur into a treaty with King Fulk of Jerusalem (1140). |
| Edessa (1144) | First Latin capital recaptured; celebrated as supreme holy warrior by Baghdad. | Strategic opportunism: exploited conflict between Joscelin II and Raymond of Antioch. |
🧠 Exam Technique & Examiner Insights
- Distinguish Between Zengi and Nur ad-Din: Top scripts separate Zengi's pragmatic, ruthless persona from his son Nur ad-Din's genuine personal piety and systematic jihad institutions.
- Interrogate 'Unite the Muslim World': Emphasise that the Muslim world was vastly fragmented between the Seljuk Sultanate, the Abbasid Caliphate, the Fatimids in Egypt, and regional Atabegs. Did Zengi unite it? Clearly not—he held a regional principality in the Jazira and northern Syria.
- Maintain Period Focus: Stick strictly to 1127 to 1144. Material on the Second Crusade's arrival (1148) or Saladin at Hattin (1187) is out of period and earns zero credit unless used briefly in a concluding forward-link.
❌ Common Errors to Avoid
- Conflating Zengi with Saladin: Claiming Zengi retook Jerusalem or united Egypt and Syria. Zengi never captured Damascus or entered Egypt.
- One-Sided Narrative: Writing a descriptive story of the siege of Edessa without evaluating whether Zengi's primary motivation was jihad or dynastic opportunism.
- Ignoring Unur and Damascus: Forgetting the crucial Damascus-Jerusalem alliance of 1140, which directly disproves that Zengi united the Muslim Levant.
- Assuming Immediate Islamic Unity: Believing all Muslims flocked to Zengi's standard; regional Muslim emirs feared his brutal methods far more than they feared the Crusaders.
Topics
1A The Age of the Crusades, c1071–1204 · The foundation of new states and the Second Crusade, c1099–1149
Question and mark scheme from the AQA A-Level History examination, AS Component 1 (1A), June 2025. QuestionVault is an independent revision resource; questions remain the copyright of the awarding body.