AQA A-Level Physics Paper 3 (3BD), June 2025: Question 1

16 marks · Hard difficulty · Extended Answer

Explain the production of an electron beam by thermionic emission, determine the specific charge of an electron, discuss its significance, and evaluate experimental methods to minimise uncertainty.

Practise this question

Question

Exam question about Thomson's determination of the electron's specific charge. Figure 1 shows the discharge tube apparatus with an electron beam deflected towards a fluorescent screen with an angular scale. Part 01.1 asks how the electron beam is produced using thermionic emission with a labelled diagram and power supply values. Parts 01.4 and 01.5 ask to show the vertical acceleration of electrons is approximately 2.5 x 10^15 m s^-2 and determine the specific charge. Part 01.6 asks for the significance of Thomson's determination. Part 01.7 shows Figure 3 with a fluorescent screen angle measurement scale from -15 to +15 degrees and asks students to discuss two methods for minimising percentage uncertainty in angle measurement.
Question text

01 This question is about Thomson’s determination of the electron’s specific charge.

You should not use the values of the electron charge, mass or specific charge from

the data and formulae booklet in this question.

Figure 1 shows part of the apparatus that Thomson used to measure the specific

charge of the electron.

Figure 1

01.1 A modern version of Thomson’s apparatus uses thermionic emission in the production

of the electron beam.

Suggest how the electron beam is produced in this modern version.

You should include a labelled diagram and suitable values for the power supplies

used. 4

[3 marks]

A potential difference (pd) of 750 V is applied between the horizontal parallel plates.

Figure 2 shows the plates and the path of the electrons.

Figure 2

The electrons enter the electric field between the plates at S and leave it at T with

speed v. Beyond T the electrons travel in a straight line at an angle θ.

θ is read from a scale on a fluorescent screen.

*02*The plates are of length 10.0 cm and are separated by a distance of 5.00 cm.

01.2 A uniform magnetic field of flux density 0.640 mT is now applied between the plates.

This returns the electron beam to its undeflected position.

Show that the horizontal component of the velocity of the electrons is approximately

2.3 × 107 m s−1.

[2 marks]

The magnetic field is switched off and θ is measured to be 25°.

01.3 Show that the vertical component of the velocity of the electrons at T is approximately

1.1 × 107 m s−1.

[1 mark]

01.4 Show that the vertical acceleration of the electrons between the plates is

approximately 2.5 × 1015 m s−2.

[2 marks]

01.5 Determine a value for the specific charge of the electron.

[3 marks]

specific charge = C kg−1

01.6 Explain the significance of the result of Thomson’s determination.

[2 marks]

01.7 Some students are given a version of the apparatus to repeat Thomson’s experiment.

Figure 3 shows a section of the measuring scale on the fluorescent screen and

the spot from the electron beam.

Figure 3

The students consider two methods for minimising the percentage uncertainty in the

measurement of the angle.

Method 1:

• choose a magnetic flux density B

• then set the magnetic flux density to B with no pd

• then adjust only the pd until the beam is horizontal

• then switch off the magnetic field and measure the angle θ.

Method 2:

• choose an angle θ

• then set the pd so that the spot from the electron beam is at θ with no

magnetic field

• then adjust only the magnetic field until the beam is horizontal.

Discuss both of these methods with reference to the percentage uncertainty in θ that

they will produce.

In your answer, suggest which method will minimise the percentage uncertainty.

No calculations are required.

[3 marks]

Mark scheme

Show the mark scheme Mark scheme for Question 1 totalling 16 marks across parts 01.1 to 01.7. 01.1 awards 3 marks for describing thermionic emission with a diagram (heater/filament, accelerating anode with hole, heater pd <= 20 V, accelerating pd > 200 V). 01.2 to 01.5 show calculation steps for velocity, vertical velocity component, acceleration, and specific charge e/m = 1.7 x 10^11 C kg^-1. 01.6 awards 2 marks for stating specific charge was much larger than hydrogen ion / proton and concluding electron has a much smaller mass. 01.7 awards 3 marks for evaluating the two methods, preferring Method 2 because pd can be adjusted to set the spot precisely on a scale line and allow a larger angle to minimise percentage uncertainty.

Question Answers Additional comments/Guidance Mark AO

01.1 Max 2 from: ✓✓ Answers may come from the written answer or 3 AO1

• Vacuum / low pressure gas (in a glass tube) a labelled diagram.

• Heater/filament/(thin) wire (correctly) connected to (ac Allow battery or cell symbol for dc power

or dc) power supply / has a current passing through it. supply. A voltmeter is not sufficient for bullet 2

or bullet 3 but may be used to award MP3 if

• An accelerating potential difference (must not be ac) values are given.

connected to an electrode with a hole

referred to as anode or connected to the positive Condone resistor drawn for filament.

terminal of power supply. BP3 do not allow horizontal plates (as shown

in Figure 1).

heater power supply 20 V

and accelerating pd > 200 V (less than 1000 kV) ✓

− +

– A-LEVEL PHYSICS – –

01.2 𝑒𝑉 𝑉 𝑉 Do not allow use of 1.6 × 10−19 (unless cancelled) or 9.11 × 10−31 2 AO2

= 𝐵𝑒𝑣 AND (therefore) 𝑣 = or = 𝐵𝑣 ✓

𝑑 𝑑𝐵 𝑑

𝑉 750 ≥ 3 SF required.

𝑣 = = = 2.34 × 107 ✓ (m s−1)

𝑑𝐵 0.05×0.64×10−3 𝑉

6 Allow use of E for and 𝑄 for 𝑒.

𝑑

01.3 v = their ans to 01.2 × tan 25° = 1.09 × 107 (m s−1) Do not allow use of 1.6 × 10−19 or 9.11 × 10−31 1 AO2

v

OR ≥ 3 sf required.

(their) ans to 01.2 2.3 × 107 m s−1 gives 1.07 × 107 m s−1

𝑣 = and 𝑣𝑣 = 𝑣 sin25°

cos 25°

7 −1 Allow ecf from their 01.2

(= 1.09 × 10 m s ) ✓

0.10 −9 2

01.4 𝑡 = ✓1 (= 4.27 × 10 s) Condone for 1 mark only 𝑎 = their ans to 01.3 ✓ 2 AO2

(their) ans to 01.2 2×0.025 12

Do not allow use of 1.6 × 10−19 or 9.11 × 10−31 but ✓ can be

awarded if this is only used in ✓2

(their) ans to 01.3 ( − 0) 15 −2 ≥ 3 sf required

𝑎 = (= 2.56 × 10 m s )✓2

(their) 𝑡 Allow ecf from their 01.3 and 01.2

Do not allow use of 1.6 × 10−19 or 9.11 × 10−31 in ✓ and ✓ but ✓ can

𝑄𝑉 2 3 1

01.5 𝑚𝑎 = or or 𝑚𝑎 = 𝑄𝐸 ✓1 be awarded. 3 AO2

𝑑

Do not allow answer with no working. Answer must follow from correct

working.

𝑒 𝑎𝑑 (their) ans to 01.4×0.050

( = =) ✓2 𝑒 𝑉 tan 25° 𝑣v 𝑣h tan 25° 𝑎

𝑚 𝑉 750 Allow = 2 OR OR OR ✓1

𝑚 0.10𝑑𝐵 0.10𝐵 0.10𝐵 𝐵𝑣h

substitution ✓2

e 1 2

= 11 −1 Other approaches based on 𝑚𝑣 = 𝑒𝑉 or 𝐵 are likely to be incorrect.

1.7 × 10 ✓3 (C kg ) (cao) 2

m

– A-LEVEL PHYSICS – –

Do not allow references to hydrogen atom or

01.6 Specific charge was much larger / approx. 2000 times than 2 AO1

just hydrogen in ✓1 but condone in ✓2.

the largest so far discovered / hydrogen ion / hydrogen

nucleus / proton ✓1 Ignore references to size.

Electron has a much smaller mass than the hydrogen ion Ignore “or greater charge”

(proton) ✓2

larger in mp1 and smaller in mp2 is not

sufficient without much/very/…

Allow << and/or >> but not < or >

A comparison is required in ✓1 and ✓2

– A-LEVEL PHYSICS – –

Ignore any suggestion that there is a different

01.7 (Method 2 is preferred) 3 AO3

number of measurements in the two methods.

Any three from: ✓✓✓ Ignore references to parallax error.

• Idea that in method 1 the spot is unlikely to be on a

scale line when the magnetic field is off Max 2 if method 2 is not preferred.

• Idea that (percentage) uncertainty/resolution is (likely Allow current reading for magnetic field reading

to be) smaller for magnetic field reading than for angle.

• Idea that using method 2 the pd can be adjusted to Condone the idea that the angle can be set to

place (the centre of) the spot on a scale line an easily read value for bullet 3.

• Using method 2 allows you to select the angle and Allow increase the accuracy instead of reduce

therefore use a large value to minimise the % the uncertainty in bullet 4.

uncertainty in θ

If no other marks awarded condone for max 1:

method 2 because of the idea that 𝜃 does not

have to be measured / is chosen / is set.

Total 16

How to answer it

Thomson's Specific Charge of the Electron

WHAT THIS QUESTION TESTS

Core Physics & Experimental Skills Assessed:

  • Thermionic Emission & Electron Gun: Construction, filament heating, accelerating potential values, and vacuum requirements.
  • Electric & Magnetic Fields: Velocity selector principle (crossed fields: eE = Bev), equations of motion in uniform electric fields.
  • Specific Charge (e/m): Derivation and calculation without circular reliance on data booklet constants.
  • Historical Significance: Relative scale of the electron's specific charge compared to the hydrogen ion (proton).
  • Experimental Design & Uncertainties: Comparative methods to reduce percentage uncertainty in angular deflection measurements.
QUESTION 01.1 • 3 MARKS

Electron Gun & Thermionic Emission

Modern apparatus for producing an electron beam

✅ Mark Scheme Requirements

Any 2 from (Mark 1 & 2):

  • Glass tube evacuated / containing low-pressure gas.
  • Heater/filament/thin wire connected to low-voltage supply (AC or DC) / has current running through it to emit electrons thermionically.
  • Anode with a central hole connected to the positive terminal of a high-voltage supply to accelerate and collimate electrons.

Mark 3 (Voltage Specifications):

  • Heater power supply: ≤ 20 V (typically 6 V or 12 V).
  • Accelerating anode potential difference: > 200 V and < 1000 kV (typically 1 kV – 5 kV; must NOT be AC).

🧠 Diagram Instructions

What to draw in your diagram:
  • Filament/Cathode: A small looped filament connected across a low-voltage supply labelled "≤ 20 V".
  • Anode: A metal plate placed downstream with a central aperture/hole aligned with the beam direction.
  • Accelerating Supply: A DC supply between filament (−) and anode (+) labelled "> 200 V".
  • Electron Path: A horizontal ray exiting through the hole labelled "electron beam".
Examiner note: Do NOT draw horizontal deflecting plates inside the gun section. A simple battery/cell symbol is accepted for DC supplies.

❌ Common Pitfalls

  • Crazy Voltages: Suggesting kilovolts to heat the filament (it would instantly melt) or only 6 V to accelerate electrons across the tube (insufficient velocity).
  • Missing the Hole in the Anode: Drawing a solid anode plate. Without an aperture, electrons simply collide and absorb into the plate rather than forming an emergent beam.
  • AC Accelerating Supply: Using an alternating supply between cathode and anode causes electrons to oscillate back and forth rather than accelerating continuously forward.
CONTEXT: CROSSED FIELDS (01.2 & 01.3)

Velocity Selector & Deflection Angle Foundation

How the velocities needed for 01.4 are determined

💡 Key Knowledge: Velocity Selector

When electric and magnetic fields are crossed such that magnetic force balances electric force:

eE = Bev ⇒ e(V / d) = Bev ⇒ v = V / (B × d)

Given typical values: V = 750 V , d = 0.050 m , B = 0.64 × 10⁻³ T :

v = 750 / (0.05 × 0.64 × 10⁻³) = 2.34 × 10⁷ m s⁻¹

💡 Key Knowledge: Vertical Velocity Component

Upon exiting the electric field after deflecting by angle θ = 25° :

tan 25° = vᵥ / v

vᵥ = 2.34 × 10⁷ × tan 25° = 1.09 × 10⁷ m s⁻¹

QUESTION 01.4 • 2 MARKS

Vertical Acceleration Between the Plates

Show that vertical acceleration is approximately 2.5 × 10¹⁵ m s⁻²

📐 Step-by-Step Calculation

  1. Time spent between plates:
    t = L / v = 0.10 / 2.34 × 10⁷ = 4.27 × 10⁻⁹ s
    (Plate length L = 0.10 m)
  2. Calculate acceleration:
    a = (vᵥ − uᵥ) / t = (1.09 × 10⁷ − 0) / 4.27 × 10⁻⁹
    a = 2.56 × 10¹⁵ m s⁻² ≈ 2.5 × 10¹⁵ m s⁻²
Mark 1: Correct time inside plates t = 4.27 × 10⁻⁹ s .
Mark 2: Substitution to get value ≥ 3 s.f. ( 2.56 × 10¹⁵ m s⁻² ).

❌ Critical Exam Restriction

DO NOT USE DATA BOOKLET VALUES!

The prompt strictly states: "You should not use the values of the electron charge, mass or specific charge from the data and formulae booklet."

Using a = eE / m = (1.6 × 10⁻¹⁹ × E) / 9.11 × 10⁻³¹ scores 0 marks because you are using the very value Thomson set out to discover!

QUESTION 01.5 • 3 MARKS

Determining Specific Charge (e/m)

Calculate the experimental specific charge of the electron

📐 Step-by-Step Working

  1. Relate electric force to acceleration:
    F = ma = eE = e(V / d)
  2. Rearrange for specific charge (e/m):
    e / m = (a × d) / V
  3. Substitute experimental values:
    e / m = (2.56 × 10¹⁵ × 0.050) / 750
  4. Final calculated value:
    e / m = 1.7 × 10¹¹ C kg⁻¹
Mark 1: Equating ma = eV/d or ma = qE .
Mark 2: Correct substitution using their acceleration from 01.4.
Mark 3: Final answer of 1.7 × 10¹¹ C kg⁻¹ (allow 2 or 3 s.f.).

🧠 Alternative Valid Approaches

You can also express specific charge directly from the combined field parameters:

e / m = (V × tan 25°) / (0.10 × d × B²)
e / m = a / (B × v_h)

All valid paths give 1.7 × 10¹¹ C kg⁻¹ .

Trap: Setting ½mv² = eV is invalid here because the voltage V is across the deflecting plates, NOT the accelerating gun voltage!
QUESTION 01.6 • 2 MARKS

Significance of Thomson's Result

Why this measurement transformed our understanding of matter

✅ Model Answer

  • The specific charge of the electron was much larger (around 1800 to 2000 times larger) than that of the largest known specific charge at the time: the hydrogen ion / proton. [1 mark]
  • Since charge was assumed to be comparable, this proved that the electron has a much smaller mass than a hydrogen ion/atom, showing it is a subatomic particle. [1 mark]

❌ Examiner Pitfalls to Avoid

  • Vague comparisons: Writing simply "it was larger" loses the mark. It must be stated as "much larger" or quantitatively "~2000 times larger".
  • Hydrogen Atom vs Ion: Do NOT refer merely to "hydrogen" or a "hydrogen atom". It must be compared to a hydrogen ion (or proton).
  • Confusing size with mass: Do not say "electrons are smaller in size"; the conclusion relates strictly to mass.
QUESTION 01.7 • 3 MARKS

Evaluating Uncertainty in Deflection Angle

Comparing Method 1 vs Method 2 to minimise percentage uncertainty

💡 The Two Experimental Methods

Method 1: Fix B → adjust V until horizontal → turn off B → measure resulting angle θ on screen.

Method 2: Choose angle θ on scale → set V so beam hits θ → adjust B until beam is horizontal.

✅ Which Method is Best & Why? (3 Marks)

Method 2 is preferred. (Required to access full marks)

Mark Breakdown (Any 3 points):

  • In Method 1, the deflected spot is unlikely to align exactly on a scale division mark, causing higher reading uncertainty.
  • In Method 2, the spot can be precisely adjusted using the fine p.d. control to sit exactly on a prominent scale division line.
  • Method 2 allows the experimenter to select a large angle θ (e.g. 15°), which automatically minimises the percentage uncertainty in θ ( % uncertainty = Δθ / θ × 100 ).
  • The percentage uncertainty / resolution in the B-field reading (or ammeter current) is much smaller than the angular scale resolution.

🧠 Exam Strategy: Uncertainty Questions

  • Always state clearly: Percentage uncertainty = (Absolute uncertainty / Measured value) × 100%. Therefore, increasing the denominator (measuring a larger angle) directly reduces percentage uncertainty!
  • Never write "Method 2 has fewer measurements" or blame "parallax error" — both methods involve reading an angle and field parameters.

Topics

Optional topics · Practical skills · 3.12 Turning points in physics (A-level only) · Uncertainty and evaluation

Question and mark scheme from the AQA A-Level Physics examination, Paper 3 (3BD), June 2025. QuestionVault is an independent revision resource; questions remain the copyright of the awarding body.