AQA A-Level Physics Paper 3 (3BD), June 2025: Question 2
4 marks · Medium difficulty · Short Answer
Compare experimental black-body radiation results with classical theoretical predictions of the ultraviolet catastrophe, and outline Planck's proposal that resolved the contradiction.
Practise this questionQuestion
Question text
02 In the early 1900s a contradiction between experimental results and theoretical
predictions was termed the ultraviolet catastrophe.
02.1 Compare these experimental results and theoretical predictions.
You may sketch and label a graph or graphs on Figure 4 as part of your answer.
[3 marks]
Figure 4
02.2 A proposal was made that allowed a resolution of the contradiction.
*08*Outline this proposal.
[1 mark]
Mark scheme
Show the mark scheme
Question Answers Additional comments/Guidance Mark AO
02.1 Any three from: ✓✓✓ Any reference to non-EM radiation MAX 2. 3 AO1
• Experiment agreed with theory at high wavelengths / Condone a positive y-intercept except for bullet
theory was correct at high wavelengths 4.
• The existence of a peak was shown by experiment but Do not allow any bullet which is contradicted
was not predicted by theory / can be shown by labelled by the graph but reward comments that refer to
curves. behaviour beyond the range shown on the
graph.
• The existence of a cut-off at low λ was shown by
experiment but was not predicted by theory / can be To gain marks for labelled curves it must be
shown by labelled curves if experimental line touches λ clear which line is theoretical and which is
axis at low but non-zero λ with a correct theoretical line experimental.
• Theory predicted intensity tends to infinity when
Bullet 4: Condone intensity tends to infinity at
wavelength tends to 0 which is not matched by
UV (even with non-zero asymptote drawn)
experiment / the experimental graph not tending to
which is not matched by experiment.
infinity can be shown from the graph (but the
theoretical intensity tending to infinity requires a written
comment).
– A-LEVEL PHYSICS – –
02.2 Light (waves) / (EM) radiation (is emitted) in quanta and idea Do NOT accept photons / particles. 1 AO1
that energy is proportional to frequency ✓
Allow small packets of energy/waves for
quanta.
Condone energy for EM radiation.
Total 4
How to answer it
Black-Body Radiation & The Ultraviolet Catastrophe
Understanding classical wave theory failures regarding black-body radiation, the experimental black-body emission spectrum vs classical predictions (Rayleigh-Jeans law), interpreting and sketching intensity against wavelength curves, and Max Planck's quantum hypothesis ( E = hf ).
Question 02.1 (3 Marks)
Compare experimental results and theoretical predictions of the ultraviolet catastrophe.
✅ Correct Answer & Mark Scheme
Any three points from the following (can be awarded via written explanation or clearly labelled curves):
- Agreement at long wavelengths: Theoretical predictions and experimental results match well at high (long) wavelengths (λ).
- Peak intensity: Experimental results exhibit a distinct peak intensity at a specific wavelength, whereas classical theory predicted no peak.
- Low wavelength cut-off: Experimental curve drops to zero (or touches the λ-axis) as wavelength approaches zero, while theory predicts no cut-off.
- Divergence as λ → 0: Classical theory predicts intensity tends to infinity as wavelength approaches 0 (UV region), which contradicts experiment. (Note: intensity tending to infinity requires a written comment).
💡 Key Knowledge
- Classical prediction (Rayleigh-Jeans Law): Assumed EM energy is emitted continuously by standing waves in the cavity. Energy density is proportional to 1 / λ⁴ . As λ → 0 , intensity I → ∞ .
- Experimental Curve: A continuous distribution that peaks at λ_max and approaches 0 as λ → 0 and as λ → ∞ .
- The "Catastrophe": Classical physics predicted that any heated cavity should emit an infinite amount of energy in the ultraviolet/shorter wavelength range.
🧠 Exam Technique & Diagram Guide
Drawing on Figure 4 is the quickest way to pick up the majority of marks, provided you label the curves clearly:
- Experimental curve: Start near the origin ( λ ≈ 0, I = 0 ), rise smoothly to a rounded peak, and decrease asymptotically towards the λ-axis as λ increases. Label this clearly as "Experimental".
- Theoretical curve: Start at a very high intensity near the y-axis, falling smoothly and monotonically without any turning points, merging with the experimental curve at large λ. Label this as "Theoretical".
- Crucial note: Write a brief sentence confirming: "Theory predicts infinite intensity as wavelength tends to zero, which does not match experiment." to guarantee the divergence mark.
❌ Common Errors
- Unlabelled curves: Drawing two curves without identifying which is theoretical and which is experimental awards 0 marks.
- Non-EM references: Referring to particles, electrons, or matter waves caps the mark for this question to a maximum of 2 marks.
- Vague descriptions: Saying "they disagree at the start" without specifying that the disagreement occurs at low wavelengths or high frequencies.
- Failing to state divergence: Forgetting that an asymptotic curve on a small graph doesn't automatically convey "approaches infinity" without an explanatory note.
Question 02.2 (1 Mark)
Outline the proposal that allowed a resolution of the contradiction.
✅ Correct Answer
Electromagnetic radiation / light is emitted in discrete packets called quanta, where the energy of each quantum is proportional to its frequency ( E = hf ).
- Light / EM radiation / waves emitted in quanta (or "discrete packets of energy").
- AND energy is proportional to frequency ( E ∝ f ).
💡 Key Knowledge
- Max Planck (1900): Proposed that atomic oscillators in black-body cavity walls could only absorb or emit energy in discrete amounts: E = nhf (where n = 1, 2, 3... ).
- At short wavelengths (high frequencies), the energy required to emit a single quantum ( hf ) is very large. Therefore, high-frequency oscillations are rarely excited at ordinary temperatures, resolving the ultraviolet catastrophe.
🧠 Exam Technique: Two Halves to 1 Mark
Notice that this single mark has two compulsory components in the mark scheme:
- Energy is emitted in discrete packets / quanta.
- Energy is directly proportional to frequency ( E ∝ f or E = hf ).
Missing either part results in zero marks!
❌ Common Errors & Examiner Traps
- Writing "photons": Do NOT write "photons" or "particles of light". The mark scheme explicitly states: "Do NOT accept photons / particles". The concept of the photon as a localized particle of light was introduced later by Einstein in 1905 (for the photoelectric effect), not by Planck's original 1900 proposal.
- Leaving out frequency: Stating only that energy is quantized without mentioning that quantum energy depends on frequency ( E ∝ f ).
Topics
Optional topics · 3.12 Turning points in physics (A-level only)
Question and mark scheme from the AQA A-Level Physics examination, Paper 3 (3BD), June 2025. QuestionVault is an independent revision resource; questions remain the copyright of the awarding body.