AQA A-Level Physics Paper 3 (3BD), June 2025: Question 2

4 marks · Medium difficulty · Short Answer

Compare experimental black-body radiation results with classical theoretical predictions of the ultraviolet catastrophe, and outline Planck's proposal that resolved the contradiction.

Practise this question

Question

Question 02 begins with context: 'In the early 1900s a contradiction between experimental results and theoretical predictions was termed the ultraviolet catastrophe.' Part 02.1 asks to compare these experimental results and theoretical predictions, with an option to sketch and label a graph on Figure 4, which shows a blank coordinate system with y-axis labeled 'intensity' and x-axis labeled 'wavelength' (3 marks). Below this are several answer lines. Part 02.2 states: 'A proposal was made that allowed a resolution of the contradiction. Outline this proposal.' (1 mark).
Question text

02 In the early 1900s a contradiction between experimental results and theoretical

predictions was termed the ultraviolet catastrophe.

02.1 Compare these experimental results and theoretical predictions.

You may sketch and label a graph or graphs on Figure 4 as part of your answer.

[3 marks]

Figure 4

02.2 A proposal was made that allowed a resolution of the contradiction.

*08*Outline this proposal.

[1 mark]

Mark scheme

Show the mark scheme Mark scheme for question 02. 02.1 awards 3 marks for any three points: agreement at high wavelengths, experimental peak not predicted by classical theory, experimental cut-off at low wavelength, and theoretical prediction tending to infinity as wavelength approaches zero while experiment decreases to zero. A sketch graph shows the experimental bell-shaped curve peaking and dropping to zero at short wavelengths, and the classical theoretical curve asymptotically increasing toward infinity at low wavelengths. 02.2 awards 1 mark for stating that electromagnetic radiation is emitted in quanta (or discrete packets of energy) where energy is proportional to frequency (E = hf).

Question Answers Additional comments/Guidance Mark AO

02.1 Any three from: ✓✓✓ Any reference to non-EM radiation MAX 2. 3 AO1

• Experiment agreed with theory at high wavelengths / Condone a positive y-intercept except for bullet

theory was correct at high wavelengths 4.

• The existence of a peak was shown by experiment but Do not allow any bullet which is contradicted

was not predicted by theory / can be shown by labelled by the graph but reward comments that refer to

curves. behaviour beyond the range shown on the

graph.

• The existence of a cut-off at low λ was shown by

experiment but was not predicted by theory / can be To gain marks for labelled curves it must be

shown by labelled curves if experimental line touches λ clear which line is theoretical and which is

axis at low but non-zero λ with a correct theoretical line experimental.

• Theory predicted intensity tends to infinity when

Bullet 4: Condone intensity tends to infinity at

wavelength tends to 0 which is not matched by

UV (even with non-zero asymptote drawn)

experiment / the experimental graph not tending to

which is not matched by experiment.

infinity can be shown from the graph (but the

theoretical intensity tending to infinity requires a written

comment).

– A-LEVEL PHYSICS – –

02.2 Light (waves) / (EM) radiation (is emitted) in quanta and idea Do NOT accept photons / particles. 1 AO1

that energy is proportional to frequency ✓

Allow small packets of energy/waves for

quanta.

Condone energy for EM radiation.

Total 4

How to answer it

Black-Body Radiation & The Ultraviolet Catastrophe

📌 What this question tests

Understanding classical wave theory failures regarding black-body radiation, the experimental black-body emission spectrum vs classical predictions (Rayleigh-Jeans law), interpreting and sketching intensity against wavelength curves, and Max Planck's quantum hypothesis ( E = hf ).

Question 02.1 (3 Marks)

Compare experimental results and theoretical predictions of the ultraviolet catastrophe.

✅ Correct Answer & Mark Scheme

Any three points from the following (can be awarded via written explanation or clearly labelled curves):

  • Agreement at long wavelengths: Theoretical predictions and experimental results match well at high (long) wavelengths (λ).
  • Peak intensity: Experimental results exhibit a distinct peak intensity at a specific wavelength, whereas classical theory predicted no peak.
  • Low wavelength cut-off: Experimental curve drops to zero (or touches the λ-axis) as wavelength approaches zero, while theory predicts no cut-off.
  • Divergence as λ → 0: Classical theory predicts intensity tends to infinity as wavelength approaches 0 (UV region), which contradicts experiment. (Note: intensity tending to infinity requires a written comment).

💡 Key Knowledge

  • Classical prediction (Rayleigh-Jeans Law): Assumed EM energy is emitted continuously by standing waves in the cavity. Energy density is proportional to 1 / λ⁴ . As λ → 0 , intensity I → ∞ .
  • Experimental Curve: A continuous distribution that peaks at λ_max and approaches 0 as λ → 0 and as λ → ∞ .
  • The "Catastrophe": Classical physics predicted that any heated cavity should emit an infinite amount of energy in the ultraviolet/shorter wavelength range.

🧠 Exam Technique & Diagram Guide

Drawing on Figure 4 is the quickest way to pick up the majority of marks, provided you label the curves clearly:

How to sketch on Figure 4:
  • Experimental curve: Start near the origin ( λ ≈ 0, I = 0 ), rise smoothly to a rounded peak, and decrease asymptotically towards the λ-axis as λ increases. Label this clearly as "Experimental".
  • Theoretical curve: Start at a very high intensity near the y-axis, falling smoothly and monotonically without any turning points, merging with the experimental curve at large λ. Label this as "Theoretical".
  • Crucial note: Write a brief sentence confirming: "Theory predicts infinite intensity as wavelength tends to zero, which does not match experiment." to guarantee the divergence mark.

❌ Common Errors

  • Unlabelled curves: Drawing two curves without identifying which is theoretical and which is experimental awards 0 marks.
  • Non-EM references: Referring to particles, electrons, or matter waves caps the mark for this question to a maximum of 2 marks.
  • Vague descriptions: Saying "they disagree at the start" without specifying that the disagreement occurs at low wavelengths or high frequencies.
  • Failing to state divergence: Forgetting that an asymptotic curve on a small graph doesn't automatically convey "approaches infinity" without an explanatory note.
Mark Allocation: [3 Marks AO1] — 1 mark per valid comparative point or clearly drawn & labelled graphical feature matching the criteria.

Question 02.2 (1 Mark)

Outline the proposal that allowed a resolution of the contradiction.

✅ Correct Answer

Electromagnetic radiation / light is emitted in discrete packets called quanta, where the energy of each quantum is proportional to its frequency ( E = hf ).

Accepted wording:
  • Light / EM radiation / waves emitted in quanta (or "discrete packets of energy").
  • AND energy is proportional to frequency ( E ∝ f ).

💡 Key Knowledge

  • Max Planck (1900): Proposed that atomic oscillators in black-body cavity walls could only absorb or emit energy in discrete amounts: E = nhf (where n = 1, 2, 3... ).
  • At short wavelengths (high frequencies), the energy required to emit a single quantum ( hf ) is very large. Therefore, high-frequency oscillations are rarely excited at ordinary temperatures, resolving the ultraviolet catastrophe.

🧠 Exam Technique: Two Halves to 1 Mark

Notice that this single mark has two compulsory components in the mark scheme:

  1. Energy is emitted in discrete packets / quanta.
  2. Energy is directly proportional to frequency ( E ∝ f or E = hf ).

Missing either part results in zero marks!

❌ Common Errors & Examiner Traps

  • Writing "photons": Do NOT write "photons" or "particles of light". The mark scheme explicitly states: "Do NOT accept photons / particles". The concept of the photon as a localized particle of light was introduced later by Einstein in 1905 (for the photoelectric effect), not by Planck's original 1900 proposal.
  • Leaving out frequency: Stating only that energy is quantized without mentioning that quantum energy depends on frequency ( E ∝ f ).
Mark Allocation: [1 Mark AO1] — Requires both the mention of discrete quanta (or packets) AND proportionality to frequency.

Topics

Optional topics · 3.12 Turning points in physics (A-level only)

Question and mark scheme from the AQA A-Level Physics examination, Paper 3 (3BD), June 2025. QuestionVault is an independent revision resource; questions remain the copyright of the awarding body.