AQA AS Level Biology Paper 2, June 2025: Question 4
7 marks · Medium difficulty · Practical Techniques & Data Analysis
Calculate stomatal density from a microscopic field of view, suggest an improvement for reliability, explain a xerophytic adaptation to reduce water loss, and draw conclusions on transpiration rates from a graph.
Practise this questionQuestion
Question text
04 A student investigated the distribution of stomata on a leaf.
The student:
• observed one area of the lower surface of a leaf using an optical microscope
• counted all the stomata.
Figure 7 shows the area of the leaf the student observed.
Figure 7
The diameter of the field of view was 0.36 mm
04.1 Use Figure 7 and the information provided to calculate the stomatal density of the
lower leaf surface.
The area of a circle can be calculated using the formula πr2
For π use 3.14
Give your answer to 2 significant figures.
[3 marks]
Answer15 stomata mm–2
04.2 Suggest one improvement the student could make to obtain a more reliable value for
stomatal density.
[1 mark]
04.3 Figure 8 shows a transverse section of a leaf from a xerophytic plant.
Figure 8
Explain how one feature shown in Figure 8 reduces water loss from the leaf.
[1 mark]
Feature
How it reduces water loss
Figure 9 shows the effect of wind speed on the rate of transpiration of a xerophytic
plant and a non-xerophytic plant.
Figure 9
04.4 Give two conclusions that can be made from Figure 9.
[2 marks]
Mark scheme
Show the mark scheme
Question Marking Guidance Mark Comments
Correct answer of 120 = 3 marks;;;
Answers in range 117 to 119 = 2 marks;;
0.1017 - 0.1018 or 0.102 (correct calculation of πr2) 3
04.1 = 1 mark (3 x
AO2)
OR
12 divided/multiplied by their incorrectly calculated
area = 1 mark;
Accept multiple/many
Count the number of stomata in many parts of leaf
fields of view/samples
and calculate a mean/average;
Ignore several
04.2 (1 x
Ignore multiple
AO1)
leaves/plants
If number stated must
be 10 or more
Any one of:
Hairs so ‘trap’ water vapour and water potential Accept: humid/moist
gradient decreased/low air as ‛water vapour’
but not
OR water/moisture on its
own
Stomata in pits/grooves/sunken stomata so ‘trap’
water vapour/reduce air movement/maintain Accept:
humidity and water potential gradient 1 diffusion/concentration
04.3 decreased/low (1 x gradient as equivalent
AO1) to water potential
OR gradient
Ignore ‘no’ water loss
Thick (waxy) cuticle so increases diffusion
distance
OR
(Thick) waxy cuticle so prevents/reduces
evaporation/transpiration;
1. As wind speed increases the rate of transpiration
increases, but at a slower rate;
2. Rate of transpiration/evaporation is higher in the
non-xerophyte (than the xerophyte)
2 max
04.4 OR (2 x
AO3)
Higher wind speed has a greater effect on the
non-xerophyte than the xerophyte;
3. Some transpiration/evaporation occurs (in both
types) in still air/no wind;
How to answer it
Gas Exchange & Transpiration: Stomatal Distribution & Xerophytes
This question assesses your practical skills and theoretical understanding of plant water balance, including:
- Microscopy Calculations: Determining stomatal density using field of view diameter and the area formula (πr²), correctly applying significant figures.
- Experimental Reliability: Improving sampling methods when using light microscopy.
- Xerophytic Adaptations: Linking anatomical features of leaves to the mechanism of reducing water loss by transpiration.
- Data Interpretation: Drawing valid comparative conclusions from graphical data relating wind speed to transpiration rate.
Stomatal Density Calculation
Calculate the stomatal density of the lower leaf surface using Figure 7 (diameter = 0.36 mm).
📐 Step-by-Step Calculation
- Count the stomata in Figure 7:
Carefully counting every pore/guard cell pair gives exactly 12 stomata. - Calculate radius (r) from diameter:
Radius r = diameter ÷ 2 = 0.36 mm ÷ 2 = 0.18 mm - Calculate area of the circular field of view:
Area = πr² = 3.14 × (0.18 mm)²
Area = 3.14 × 0.0324 mm² = 0.101736 mm² (accepts 0.1017 – 0.102 mm²) - Calculate stomatal density:
Density = Number of stomata ÷ Area
Density = 12 ÷ 0.101736 ≈ 117.95 stomata mm⁻² - Apply required significant figures (2 s.f.):
117.95 rounded to 2 significant figures = 120
✅ Correct Answer & Mark Scheme
120 stomata mm⁻² (3 marks)
• 3 marks: Final answer 120 (correct value to 2 s.f.).
• 2 marks: Unrounded or slightly different counting yielding 117 to 119.
• 1 mark: Correct area calculated (0.1017 – 0.1018 or 0.102 mm²) OR 12 divided by an incorrectly calculated area.
🧠 Exam Technique
- Cross off as you count: Mark each stoma with a pen or pencil directly on Figure 7 so you do not double-count or miss any around the periphery.
- Keep full precision in calculator: Store the area value in your calculator memory and divide 12 by the unrounded value before rounding only at the very final step to 2 s.f.
❌ Common Errors
- Using diameter instead of radius: Forgetting to divide 0.36 mm by 2 before squaring leads to an area 4× too large.
- Rounding too early: Rounding 0.101736 to 0.1 mm² introduces substantial rounding error into the final quotient.
- Ignoring significant figure instructions: Leaving the answer as 117.95 or 118 loses the third mark.
Improving Reliability of Stomatal Density
Suggest one improvement the student could make to obtain a more reliable value for stomatal density.
✅ Mark Scheme Requirement
Count the number of stomata in many parts of the leaf AND calculate a mean/average.
Reject / Ignore: "Several" fields of view. If a number is stated, it must be 10 or more.
💡 Key Knowledge
Reliability in biological sampling requires:
- Representative sampling: Stomata are not distributed perfectly uniformly across a leaf epidermis.
- Replication & mean: Taking multiple samples allows calculation of a mean, reducing the effect of anomalous fields of view.
❌ Examiner Pitfall
- Incomplete statement: Writing only "look at more areas" scores 0. You must state both repeating/sampling many parts and calculating a mean.
- Wrong level of replication: Suggesting "use more leaves" or "test different plants" changes the sample material rather than finding a reliable value for this leaf.
Xerophytic Leaf Adaptations
Explain how one feature shown in Figure 8 reduces water loss from the leaf.
✅ Any ONE of the following paired statements (1 mark):
- Feature: Hairs
How: 'Traps' water vapour / creates a layer of humid air and decreases / reduces the water potential gradient (between inside and outside of leaf). - Feature: Stomata in pits / sunken stomata / stomatal grooves
How: 'Traps' water vapour / reduces air movement / maintains high humidity and decreases / reduces the water potential gradient. - Feature: Thick waxy cuticle
How: Increases diffusion distance (for water vapour). - Feature: Thick waxy cuticle
How: Prevents / reduces evaporation / transpiration (since wax is waterproof/impermeable).
💡 Key Knowledge: The Transpiration Gradient
Water moves down a water potential (or concentration) gradient from high water potential inside air spaces (ψ ≈ 0) to lower water potential in ambient air.
- Trapping moist air next to stomata reduces this gradient, drastically slowing the rate of diffusion.
- The cuticle is composed of hydrophobic cutin/wax, which creates an impermeable barrier to water molecules.
❌ Common Errors
- "Traps water": Examiners reject "traps water" or "traps moisture" alone. It must be specified as water vapour or humid/moist air.
- Stating "stops all water loss": Adaptations reduce water loss, they never stop it completely, as stomata must open for CO₂ uptake.
- Missing the water potential link: Merely stating "hairs trap air" without mentioning that this reduces the water potential (or diffusion) gradient fails to gain full credit in questions worth explanation marks.
Data Interpretation: Transpiration vs Wind Speed
Give two conclusions that can be made from Figure 9.
✅ Any TWO of the following points (2 marks max):
- As wind speed increases, the rate of transpiration increases, but at a slower / decreasing rate (plateaus / levels off).
- Rate of transpiration / evaporation is higher in the non-xerophyte than in the xerophyte (at all wind speeds).
OR Higher wind speed has a greater effect on the non-xerophyte than the xerophyte. - Some transpiration / evaporation occurs in still air / at zero wind speed (in both plants).
🧠 Exam Technique for Graphical Conclusions
- Look at the intercept (x = 0): Neither curve starts at the origin (0,0); both have a positive y-intercept, meaning transpiration occurs even with no wind.
- Look at the comparative heights: The non-xerophyte curve is consistently above the xerophyte curve across the entire range.
- Describe the gradient change: Both curves show a steep initial rise that gradually flattens out (rate of increase slows).
❌ Common Errors
- Writing "directly proportional": The relationship is non-linear; describing it as "directly proportional" is a severe biological error.
- Vague comparisons: Stating "wind affects transpiration" without specifying direction (increases) or comparison between the two plant types.
Topics
Biology · Practical skills · 3.3 Organisms exchange substances with their environment · Experimental design · Data analysis
Question and mark scheme from the AQA AS Level Biology examination, Paper 2, June 2025. QuestionVault is an independent revision resource; questions remain the copyright of the awarding body.