AQA AS Level Biology Paper 2, June 2025: Question 4

7 marks · Medium difficulty · Practical Techniques & Data Analysis

Calculate stomatal density from a microscopic field of view, suggest an improvement for reliability, explain a xerophytic adaptation to reduce water loss, and draw conclusions on transpiration rates from a graph.

Practise this question

Question

Question 4 consists of four parts. Part 04.1 shows Figure 7, a circular microscopic field of view showing leaf epidermal cells and 12 visible stomata, with a stated diameter of 0.36 mm, asking to calculate stomatal density to 2 significant figures. Part 04.2 asks for one improvement to obtain a more reliable value for stomatal density. Part 04.3 shows Figure 8, a cross-section micrograph of a xerophytic leaf labelling thick waxy cuticle, stomata, hairs, and lower epidermis, asking to explain how one feature reduces water loss. Part 04.4 displays Figure 9, a line graph plotting rate of transpiration against wind speed for a non-xerophytic plant (solid line) and a xerophytic plant (dashed line), asking for two conclusions.
Question text

04 A student investigated the distribution of stomata on a leaf.

The student:

• observed one area of the lower surface of a leaf using an optical microscope

• counted all the stomata.

Figure 7 shows the area of the leaf the student observed.

Figure 7

The diameter of the field of view was 0.36 mm

04.1 Use Figure 7 and the information provided to calculate the stomatal density of the

lower leaf surface.

The area of a circle can be calculated using the formula πr2

For π use 3.14

Give your answer to 2 significant figures.

[3 marks]

Answer15 stomata mm–2

04.2 Suggest one improvement the student could make to obtain a more reliable value for

stomatal density.

[1 mark]

04.3 Figure 8 shows a transverse section of a leaf from a xerophytic plant.

Figure 8

Explain how one feature shown in Figure 8 reduces water loss from the leaf.

[1 mark]

Feature

How it reduces water loss

Figure 9 shows the effect of wind speed on the rate of transpiration of a xerophytic

plant and a non-xerophytic plant.

Figure 9

04.4 Give two conclusions that can be made from Figure 9.

[2 marks]

Mark scheme

Show the mark scheme Mark scheme for Question 4: 04.1 awards 3 marks for 120 stomata mm^-2 (2 marks for 117 to 119; 1 mark for calculating field area as 0.1017-0.102 mm^2). 04.2 awards 1 mark for counting stomata in many parts of the leaf and calculating a mean. 04.3 awards 1 mark for naming a feature and explaining its mechanism (hairs trap water vapour reducing water potential gradient, stomata in pits trap moisture, or thick cuticle increases diffusion distance/reduces evaporation). 04.4 awards 2 marks for any two conclusions: transpiration rate increases with wind speed at a decreasing rate, non-xerophyte has a higher transpiration rate or greater response, and some transpiration occurs in still air.

Question Marking Guidance Mark Comments

Correct answer of 120 = 3 marks;;;

Answers in range 117 to 119 = 2 marks;;

0.1017 - 0.1018 or 0.102 (correct calculation of πr2) 3

04.1 = 1 mark (3 x

AO2)

OR

12 divided/multiplied by their incorrectly calculated

area = 1 mark;

Accept multiple/many

Count the number of stomata in many parts of leaf

fields of view/samples

and calculate a mean/average;

Ignore several

04.2 (1 x

Ignore multiple

AO1)

leaves/plants

If number stated must

be 10 or more

Any one of:

Hairs so ‘trap’ water vapour and water potential Accept: humid/moist

gradient decreased/low air as ‛water vapour’

but not

OR water/moisture on its

own

Stomata in pits/grooves/sunken stomata so ‘trap’

water vapour/reduce air movement/maintain Accept:

humidity and water potential gradient 1 diffusion/concentration

04.3 decreased/low (1 x gradient as equivalent

AO1) to water potential

OR gradient

Ignore ‘no’ water loss

Thick (waxy) cuticle so increases diffusion

distance

OR

(Thick) waxy cuticle so prevents/reduces

evaporation/transpiration;

1. As wind speed increases the rate of transpiration

increases, but at a slower rate;

2. Rate of transpiration/evaporation is higher in the

non-xerophyte (than the xerophyte)

2 max

04.4 OR (2 x

AO3)

Higher wind speed has a greater effect on the

non-xerophyte than the xerophyte;

3. Some transpiration/evaporation occurs (in both

types) in still air/no wind;

How to answer it

Gas Exchange & Transpiration: Stomatal Distribution & Xerophytes

📌 What this question tests

This question assesses your practical skills and theoretical understanding of plant water balance, including:

  • Microscopy Calculations: Determining stomatal density using field of view diameter and the area formula (πr²), correctly applying significant figures.
  • Experimental Reliability: Improving sampling methods when using light microscopy.
  • Xerophytic Adaptations: Linking anatomical features of leaves to the mechanism of reducing water loss by transpiration.
  • Data Interpretation: Drawing valid comparative conclusions from graphical data relating wind speed to transpiration rate.
Question 04.1 • 3 Marks

Stomatal Density Calculation

Calculate the stomatal density of the lower leaf surface using Figure 7 (diameter = 0.36 mm).

📐 Step-by-Step Calculation

  1. Count the stomata in Figure 7:
    Carefully counting every pore/guard cell pair gives exactly 12 stomata.
  2. Calculate radius (r) from diameter:
    Radius r = diameter ÷ 2 = 0.36 mm ÷ 2 = 0.18 mm
  3. Calculate area of the circular field of view:
    Area = πr² = 3.14 × (0.18 mm)²
    Area = 3.14 × 0.0324 mm² = 0.101736 mm² (accepts 0.1017 – 0.102 mm²)
  4. Calculate stomatal density:
    Density = Number of stomata ÷ Area
    Density = 12 ÷ 0.101736 ≈ 117.95 stomata mm⁻²
  5. Apply required significant figures (2 s.f.):
    117.95 rounded to 2 significant figures = 120

✅ Correct Answer & Mark Scheme

120 stomata mm⁻² (3 marks)

Mark Breakdown:
• 3 marks: Final answer 120 (correct value to 2 s.f.).
• 2 marks: Unrounded or slightly different counting yielding 117 to 119.
• 1 mark: Correct area calculated (0.1017 – 0.1018 or 0.102 mm²) OR 12 divided by an incorrectly calculated area.

🧠 Exam Technique

  • Cross off as you count: Mark each stoma with a pen or pencil directly on Figure 7 so you do not double-count or miss any around the periphery.
  • Keep full precision in calculator: Store the area value in your calculator memory and divide 12 by the unrounded value before rounding only at the very final step to 2 s.f.

❌ Common Errors

  • Using diameter instead of radius: Forgetting to divide 0.36 mm by 2 before squaring leads to an area 4× too large.
  • Rounding too early: Rounding 0.101736 to 0.1 mm² introduces substantial rounding error into the final quotient.
  • Ignoring significant figure instructions: Leaving the answer as 117.95 or 118 loses the third mark.
Question 04.2 • 1 Mark

Improving Reliability of Stomatal Density

Suggest one improvement the student could make to obtain a more reliable value for stomatal density.

✅ Mark Scheme Requirement

Count the number of stomata in many parts of the leaf AND calculate a mean/average.

Accept: "Multiple / many fields of view / samples and calculate a mean."
Reject / Ignore: "Several" fields of view. If a number is stated, it must be 10 or more.

💡 Key Knowledge

Reliability in biological sampling requires:

  • Representative sampling: Stomata are not distributed perfectly uniformly across a leaf epidermis.
  • Replication & mean: Taking multiple samples allows calculation of a mean, reducing the effect of anomalous fields of view.

❌ Examiner Pitfall

  • Incomplete statement: Writing only "look at more areas" scores 0. You must state both repeating/sampling many parts and calculating a mean.
  • Wrong level of replication: Suggesting "use more leaves" or "test different plants" changes the sample material rather than finding a reliable value for this leaf.
Question 04.3 • 1 Mark

Xerophytic Leaf Adaptations

Explain how one feature shown in Figure 8 reduces water loss from the leaf.

✅ Any ONE of the following paired statements (1 mark):

  • Feature: Hairs
    How: 'Traps' water vapour / creates a layer of humid air and decreases / reduces the water potential gradient (between inside and outside of leaf).
  • Feature: Stomata in pits / sunken stomata / stomatal grooves
    How: 'Traps' water vapour / reduces air movement / maintains high humidity and decreases / reduces the water potential gradient.
  • Feature: Thick waxy cuticle
    How: Increases diffusion distance (for water vapour).
  • Feature: Thick waxy cuticle
    How: Prevents / reduces evaporation / transpiration (since wax is waterproof/impermeable).

💡 Key Knowledge: The Transpiration Gradient

Water moves down a water potential (or concentration) gradient from high water potential inside air spaces (ψ ≈ 0) to lower water potential in ambient air.

  • Trapping moist air next to stomata reduces this gradient, drastically slowing the rate of diffusion.
  • The cuticle is composed of hydrophobic cutin/wax, which creates an impermeable barrier to water molecules.

❌ Common Errors

  • "Traps water": Examiners reject "traps water" or "traps moisture" alone. It must be specified as water vapour or humid/moist air.
  • Stating "stops all water loss": Adaptations reduce water loss, they never stop it completely, as stomata must open for CO₂ uptake.
  • Missing the water potential link: Merely stating "hairs trap air" without mentioning that this reduces the water potential (or diffusion) gradient fails to gain full credit in questions worth explanation marks.
Question 04.4 • 2 Marks

Data Interpretation: Transpiration vs Wind Speed

Give two conclusions that can be made from Figure 9.

✅ Any TWO of the following points (2 marks max):

  1. As wind speed increases, the rate of transpiration increases, but at a slower / decreasing rate (plateaus / levels off).
  2. Rate of transpiration / evaporation is higher in the non-xerophyte than in the xerophyte (at all wind speeds).
    OR Higher wind speed has a greater effect on the non-xerophyte than the xerophyte.
  3. Some transpiration / evaporation occurs in still air / at zero wind speed (in both plants).

🧠 Exam Technique for Graphical Conclusions

  • Look at the intercept (x = 0): Neither curve starts at the origin (0,0); both have a positive y-intercept, meaning transpiration occurs even with no wind.
  • Look at the comparative heights: The non-xerophyte curve is consistently above the xerophyte curve across the entire range.
  • Describe the gradient change: Both curves show a steep initial rise that gradually flattens out (rate of increase slows).

❌ Common Errors

  • Writing "directly proportional": The relationship is non-linear; describing it as "directly proportional" is a severe biological error.
  • Vague comparisons: Stating "wind affects transpiration" without specifying direction (increases) or comparison between the two plant types.

Topics

Biology · Practical skills · 3.3 Organisms exchange substances with their environment · Experimental design · Data analysis

Question and mark scheme from the AQA AS Level Biology examination, Paper 2, June 2025. QuestionVault is an independent revision resource; questions remain the copyright of the awarding body.