AQA AS Level Physics Paper 2, June 2023: Question 3

10 marks · Hard difficulty · Extended Answer

Analyze the principles of moments using a measuring spoon apparatus, including balancing conditions, deriving mass relationships, interpreting a graph of mass against distance, and evaluating scale uncertainty.

Practise this question

Question

Diagrams and questions about a measuring spoon. Figure 9 shows a spoon balancing on a pivot at point P. Figure 10 shows the spoon with food in the bowl of length 32.0 cm, with the pivot moved a distance x to point Q. Figure 11 shows a graph of M in g against x in cm. Sub-questions 03.1 to 03.4 ask to explain balance, show a formula involving masses m and M, determine the weight of the spoon using the graph, and explain how uncertainty in the scale changes.
Question text

03 Figure 9 shows a spoon used to measure the mass of food.

The empty spoon balances when a pivot is placed under a point P halfway along the

spoon.

Figure 9

The spoon tilts when food of mass M is placed in the bowl. The spoon is rebalanced

by moving the pivot a distance x to the right of P. The new position of the pivot is

under point Q in Figure 10.

Figure 10

The total length of the spoon is 32.0 cm. The weight of the food acts through a line at

a distance of 4.0 cm from the right-hand edge of the spoon.

03.1 Explain why the spoon in Figure 10 is balanced when the pivot is at Q.

[2 marks]

03.2 The empty spoon has mass m.

Show that, for the arrangement in Figure 10,

m (12.0 − x)

=

M x

*12* [2 marks]

03.3 Figure 11 shows how x varies with M.

Figure 11

Determine, using Figure 11, the weight of the empty spoon.

[3 marks]

14 weight = N

03.4 A scale, in grams, is marked on the spoon between P and the bowl. Figure 11 is

used to calibrate this scale in intervals of 25 g.

M can be measured by balancing the spoon. The value is read from the point of the

scale directly above the pivot.

State and explain how the uncertainty in the value read from the scale changes

as M increases.

[3 marks]

Mark scheme

Show the mark scheme Mark scheme for questions 03.1 to 03.4 detailing the required points for balanced moments, algebraic derivation, graph reading to calculate weight in Newtons, and analysis of scale uncertainty as M increases.

Question Answers Additional Comments/Guidance Mark AO

03.1 idea that moments are balanced or that there is no resultant Answer must relate to the context e.g. reference to 2 AO1

moment Q or weight of food/spoon

Allow ‘force × distance’ or ‘F × d’ for ‘moment’.

(because)

(overall) centre of mass is now beneath/at Q ‘Anticlockwise moment of weight of spoon about Q

OR = clockwise moment of weight of M about Q’ gains

line of action of (overall) weight is through Q both marks.

03.2 For 1 mark: condone absent g if credible evidence 2 AO2

statement of balanced moments seen e.g. mgx = Mg(16 – 4 –

for ’12 – x’ presented e.g. mx = M(16 – 4 – x)

x), leading to required formula

or mx = M(28 – 16 – x)

OR

condone lack of evidence for ‘12 – x‘ if g is shown

e.g. mgx = Mg(12 – x).

Need to see g and evidence for ‘12 – x‘ for both

marks. Evidence for ‘12 – x‘ need not be in an

expression of a moment.

Allow 9.81 or 9.8 instead of g.

max two from: Allow correct conversion of M to kg and/or x to m

03.3 3 AO1

for read offs or in the substitution. 13

• reads off a pair of values (e.g. 115 g, 5.0 cm)

Expect to see 160 g for mass of spoon.

• substitutes into formula

Allow credit for an algebraic solution to get m:

• multiplies their m by g

m (12 – x)

e.g. when m = M, = =1

M x

So, 12 = 2x, x = 6.0 cm. Reads off M at 6.0 cm to

answer that rounds to 1.5 or 1.6 (N) get 160 g.

03.4 (absolute) uncertainty in M increases as M increases MP1 only awarded supported by some relevant 3 AO3

explanation. Treat ‘percentage’ uncertainty as

neutral.

(because) as M increases:

marks on the scale get closer OR range of values of M for a Allow MP2 and MP3 for quantitative evidence given

fixed range of x increases (or vice versa) using Figure 11 e.g. from 0 g to 25 g, Δx ~ 1.5 cm;

from 175 g to 200 g, Δx ~ 0.4 cm OR calculates

gradients at low and high M.

the gradient (in Figure 11) increases so the scale markings are

unequal owtte

Total 10

How to answer it

Study Guide: Moments, Equilibrium and Calibration

What this question tests

This question assesses the principle of moments, conditions for static equilibrium, algebraic modelling of physical setups, interpreting non-linear graphical data, and analysing uncertainties in graduated scales.

Question 0.3.1 [2 marks]

Explaining Equilibrium under a New Pivot Point

✅ Correct Answer

The spoon is balanced because moments are balanced (no resultant moment), and the line of action of the overall weight passes directly through the new pivot Q (or the overall centre of mass is vertically beneath Q ).

💡 Key Knowledge

  • First condition for equilibrium: Net force = 0.
  • Second condition for equilibrium: Net moment = 0 about any point.
Mark scheme guidance: 2 marks total. 1 mark for stating moments are balanced / no resultant moment. 1 mark for stating the centre of mass / weight line of action passes through Q.
Question 0.3.2 [2 marks]

Deriving the Equilibrium Formula

✅ Correct Answer

Equating clockwise and anticlockwise moments about pivot Q :
Anticlockwise moment of spoon = mg × (12.0 - x)
Clockwise moment of food = Mg × x
Equating them: mg(12.0 - x) = Mgx
Rearranging gives: m / M = (12.0 - x) / x

🧠 Exam Technique

Carefully determine distance lever arms relative to point Q using total length and offsets given in the diagram. Total length is 32.0 cm, pivot P is halfway (16.0 cm), and the bowl center is 4.0 cm from the edge.

❌ Common Errors

Forgetting to include acceleration due to gravity ( g ) initially in the moment equations, or making arithmetic slip-ups when expressing the distance of the spoon's centre of mass from Q .

Mark scheme guidance: 2 marks. Statement of balanced moments (condoning missing g if clear) leading correctly to the required equation.
Question 0.3.3 [3 marks]

Determining the Weight of the Empty Spoon

📐 Step-by-Step Calculation

  1. Select a clear coordinate pair from the curve on Figure 11 (e.g., x = 5.0 cm , M = 115 g ). Alternatively, use the algebraic intercept where m = M giving x = 6.0 cm .
  2. Substitute values into the derived formula:
    m / M = (12.0 - 5.0) / 5.0
    m / 115 = 7.0 / 5.0 = 1.4
    m = 1.4 × 115 = 161 g (approx 160 g).
  3. Convert mass to weight in Newtons:
    Weight = mg = 0.160 kg × 9.81 m s⁻² = 1.57 N (rounds to 1.6 N or 1.5 N depending on coordinate choice).

❌ Common Calculation Traps

Failing to convert mass in grams ( g ) to kilograms ( kg ) before multiplying by g (9.81 or 9.8) to find weight in Newtons!

Mark scheme guidance: 3 marks. 1 mark for reading correct coordinate pair, 1 mark for substitution/rearrangement to find mass ( m ≈ 160 g ), 1 mark for converting to weight with correct unit (rounds to 1.5 N or 1.6 N).
Question 0.3.4 [3 marks]

Uncertainty Analysis of the Calibration Scale

✅ Correct Answer

The absolute uncertainty in the value read for M increases as M increases.

💡 Explanation & Reasoning

  • The scale divisions on the spoon are fixed/evenly spaced (intervals of 25 g).
  • Due to the non-linear (exponential/quadratic-like) curve on Figure 11, equal changes in mass ( ΔM ) correspond to smaller and smaller shifts in pivot position ( Δx ) at higher masses.
  • Alternatively, for a fixed scale resolution of x , a constant interval step on the physical scale represents a much wider range of mass values at the upper end of the calibration curve because the gradient increases significantly.
Mark scheme guidance: 3 marks. MP1: Statement that uncertainty increases with support explanation. MP2: Reference to marks on scale getting closer or changing gradient behaviour. MP3: Clear linkage to Figure 11 non-linearity.

Topics

Physics · Practical skills · 3.4 Mechanics and materials · Uncertainty and evaluation

Question and mark scheme from the AQA AS Level Physics examination, Paper 2, June 2023. QuestionVault is an independent revision resource; questions remain the copyright of the awarding body.