AQA GCSE Biology Biology Paper 1 (Higher), 2024: Question 3

12 marks · Standard Demand difficulty · Extended Answer

Describe chemical tests for carbohydrates in cake and answer questions about an investigation into bread tasting sweet due to carbohydrate breakdown in saliva.

Practise this question

Question

The question page shows Question 03 split into five parts about carbohydrates in cake and bread. Part 03.1 asks students to describe the chemical tests that could be used to show the presence of the two types of carbohydrate in cake and to include a risk assessment, worth 6 marks, followed by answer lines. Lower on the page, a short practical description explains that a student put a square piece of bread into their mouth without chewing and recorded the time taken for the bread to taste sweet for three bread types; a table labelled Table 2 gives Brown 43 seconds, White 35 seconds, and Wholemeal 57 seconds. Parts 03.2 to 03.5 then ask for the dependent variable, one control variable, an explanation of why bread tasted sweet, and one reason why the investigation was not valid, worth 1, 1, 3, and 1 marks respectively.
Question text

03 Cake and bread each contain the same two types of carbohydrate.

03.1 Describe the chemical tests that could be used to show the presence of the two types

of carbohydrate in cake.

Include a risk assessment in your answer.

[6 marks]

A student investigated three types of bread.

For each type of bread, the student:

• put a square piece of bread into their mouth

• did not chew the bread

• recorded the time taken for the bread to taste sweet.

Table 2 shows the results.

Table 2

Time taken for bread to

Type of bread

taste sweet in seconds

Brown 43

White 35

Wholemeal 57

03.2 What was the dependent variable in the investigation?

[1 mark]

03.3 Give one control variable the student should have used in the investigation.

[1 mark]

03.4 During the investigation, the bread began to taste sweet in the student’s mouth.

Explain why the bread tasted sweet.

[3 marks]

03.5 Suggest one reason why the results of the investigation were not valid.

Do not refer to control variables in your answer.

[1 mark]

Mark scheme

Show the mark scheme The mark scheme page for Question 3 gives level-based marking for part 03.1, with Level 3 worth 5 to 6 marks for a logically sequenced valid method including correct reagents, positive results, and a risk assessment. Indicative content includes iodine turning from orange-brown to blue-black for starch, Benedict's reagent with heating changing from blue to green, yellow, orange or brick red for sugar or glucose, and safety points such as using a water bath, eye protection, pointing test tubes away from faces, allowing hot equipment to cool, and managing irritant spills. Parts 03.2 to 03.5 award marks for identifying the dependent variable as time taken to taste sweet, naming a control variable such as size or mass of bread, explaining sweetness by starch being broken down into sugar by amylase in saliva, and suggesting validity issues such as no repeats, subjective taste perception, or variable saliva or amylase production.

Question 3

AO /

Question Answers Mark

Spec Ref.

03.1 Level 3: The method would lead to the production of a valid 5–6 AO1

outcome. The key steps are identified and logically sequenced. 4.2.2.1

RPA4

Level 2: The method would not necessarily lead to a valid 3–4

outcome. Most steps are identified, but the method is not fully

logically sequenced.

Level 1: The method would not lead to a valid outcome. Some 1–2

relevant steps are identified, but links are not made clear.

No relevant content. 0

Indicative content

• iodine solution tests for starch

• iodine changes from yellow / orange / brown

• to blue-black or black or dark blue (to show starch is present

when added to cake)

• Benedict’s (reagent) tests for sugar / glucose

• heat (to at least 60 °C) / boil cake with Benedict’s (reagent)

• Benedict’s (reagent) changes from blue

• to green / yellow / orange / brown / (brick) red (to show sugar /

glucose is present when added to cake)

• risk of skin burns from flame (when heating) or risk of skin burns

from hot glass or risk of scald / burn from boiling water

o use a water bath

o wait for equipment to cool before touching

• risk of Benedict’s (reagent) spitting into face / eyes when heating

o wear eye protection

o point test tube away from face(s) when heating

• risk of Benedict’s (reagent) as an irritant or risk of iodine

(solution) as an irritant

o clean up spills immediately

o wear (protective) gloves or wear eye protection

o use a dropper bottle (to reduce chance of spills)

(allow answers in terms of bread)

For Level 3 answers should include the reagents used to test for

starch and sugar with correct positiveMARKSCHEMEresults, and a risk– – –

assessment.

AO /

Question Answers Extra information Mark

Spec Ref.

03.2 time taken (for bread) to taste / ignore time unqualified 1 AO2

14 become sweet 4.2.2.1

AO /

Spec Ref.

03.3 any one from: 1 AO3

• size / mass of bread allow amount of bread 4.2.2.1

• surface area of bread

• location of bread on tongue allow position of bread in mouth

• clean mouth between tests allow a method of cleaning the

mouth between tests

ignore temperature of bread

ignore use the same student

AO /

Spec Ref.

03.4 bread contains starch 1 AO2

4.2.2.1

(starch is) broken down into allow (starch is) broken down 1

sugar into glucose / maltose

by amylase (in saliva) ignore by carbohydrase (in 1

saliva)

allow (sugar / glucose) solution

reaches taste receptors (on

tongue)

alternative route:

bread contains sugar / glucose

(1)

sugar / glucose dissolves in

saliva (in mouth) (1)

(sugar / glucose) solution

MARKreaches taste receptors (onSCHEME– – –

tongue) (1)

AO /

Spec Ref.

03.5 any one from: 1 AO3

• investigation not repeated (by ignore mean not calculated 4.2.2.1

the same / different

student(s))

• (results) rely on student’s

(perception of) taste

or taste is subjective

• amount of saliva / amylase

produced is variable

ignore reference to control

variables

Total Question 3 12

How to answer it

Testing carbohydrates in cake and bread

What this question tests

You need to know the correct food tests for starch and sugar/glucose, how to describe the colour changes, and how to include a simple risk assessment. The later parts also test variables in investigations, enzyme action in saliva, and spotting why results may not be valid.

Question 03.1 — Describe the chemical tests for the two carbohydrates in cake

6 marks: method + positive result + risk assessment

💡 Key knowledge

  • Iodine solution tests for starch.
  • Iodine changes from brown/orange to blue-black if starch is present.
  • Benedict’s reagent tests for sugar/glucose.
  • For Benedict’s, you must heat the sample, usually in a hot water bath.
  • Benedict’s changes from blue to green/yellow/orange/brick red if sugar is present.

✅ Correct answer structure

To test for starch: add iodine solution to the cake sample. If starch is present, the iodine turns blue-black.

To test for sugar/glucose: add Benedict’s reagent to the cake sample and heat it in a water bath. If sugar is present, it changes from blue to green/yellow/orange/brick red.

Risk assessment: use a water bath and care with hot equipment to avoid burns; wear eye protection and point test tubes away from the face when heating; clean up spills because reagents may irritate skin/eyes.

🧠 Exam technique

  • Name the reagent and the food tested.
  • Always include the positive result colour.
  • For Benedict’s, mention heating — without heating, the method is incomplete.
  • For a top-level answer, write the tests in a logical sequence: starch test, then sugar test, then risk.

❌ Common errors

  • Saying only “test for carbohydrates” is too vague.
  • Mixing up the colour change: iodine goes blue-black, not Benedict’s.
  • Forgetting to heat Benedict’s reagent.
  • Calling the sugar test “Benedict’s test for starch” — this loses the mark.
  • Giving a risk such as “be careful” without saying what the hazard is or how to reduce it.
How marks are awarded: The mark scheme rewards students who name both correct tests, give the correct positive colour changes, and include a sensible risk assessment. The best answers are clear, ordered, and specific.

Question 03.2 — Dependent variable

1 mark

✅ Correct answer

The time taken for the bread to taste sweet.

💡 Key knowledge

The dependent variable is what is measured in the investigation. Here, the student measured how long it took before the bread tasted sweet.

❌ Common errors

Don’t write bread type — that is the independent variable. Also, “time” alone is usually acceptable only if clearly linked to becoming sweet.

Question 03.3 — One control variable

1 mark

✅ Correct answers

  • Size or mass of bread
  • Surface area of bread
  • Location of bread on the tongue
  • Cleaning the mouth between tests

🧠 Exam technique

Give one specific factor that should be kept the same for each bread type. The mark scheme allows several answers, so choose the one easiest to explain clearly.

❌ Common errors

Do not give the same student or the temperature of the bread — these are ignored by the mark scheme.

Question 03.4 — Why did the bread taste sweet?

3 marks

✅ Correct answer

Bread contains starch.
Starch is broken down into sugar by amylase in saliva.
The sugar then reaches the taste receptors on the tongue, so the bread tastes sweet.

Alternative acceptable route: bread contains sugar/glucose; it dissolves in saliva; the sugar reaches the taste receptors.

💡 Key knowledge

  • Saliva contains the enzyme amylase.
  • Amylase breaks down starch into sugars such as maltose/glucose.
  • Taste is detected when dissolved substances stimulate taste receptors on the tongue.

❌ Common errors

  • Saying simply “the bread is sweet” without explaining why.
  • Forgetting the enzyme name amylase.
  • Confusing saliva with stomach acid or digestion in the stomach.
Examiner insight: Full marks go to students who connect all three ideas: starch in bread → amylase in saliva → sugar formed → sweet taste receptors activated.

Question 03.5 — Why were the results not valid?

1 mark

✅ Correct answers

  • The investigation was not repeated by the same or different students.
  • The results rely on the student’s perception of taste, so taste is subjective.
  • The amount of saliva/amylase produced may vary.

🧠 Exam technique

This is a validity question, not a control-variable question. Give one reason the results may not be trustworthy or repeatable.

❌ Common errors

The mark scheme says to ignore control-variable answers here, so do not write about bread size or surface area.

Quick revision summary

💡 Carbohydrate tests

  • Iodine → starch → blue-black
  • Benedict’s + heat → sugar/glucose → green to brick red

🧠 What examiners want

  • Correct reagent
  • Correct positive colour change
  • Risk assessment for heating and chemicals
  • Clear explanation of the sweet taste in bread

📐 Calculation-style thinking

No numerical calculation is needed here, but you should still answer in a step-by-step way:

  1. State the test.
  2. State what it tests for.
  3. State the positive result.
  4. Add the safety point.

Topics

Biology · Required Practicals · B4: Bioenergetics · Required Practicals

Question and mark scheme from the AQA GCSE Biology examination, Biology Paper 1 (Higher), 2024. QuestionVault is an independent revision resource; questions remain the copyright of the awarding body.