OCR A-Level Geography Geographical debates (03), June 2025: Question 15
33 marks · Hard difficulty · Extended Response
Assess the extent to which socio-economic factors influence the use of oceans.
Practise this questionQuestion
Question text
Assess the extent to which socio‑economic factors influence the use of oceans. [33]
Mark scheme
Show the mark scheme
Question Answer Mark Guidance
Assess the extent to which socio-economic factors 33 Indicative content AO1 – 9 marks
influence the use of the ocean. AO1 x9
AO2 x24 Demonstrating knowledge and understanding of factors
AO1 influencing the use of the ocean could potentially include:
Level 4 (7–9 marks)
• Use of ocean includes biological resources, energy +
Demonstrates comprehensive knowledge and understanding mineral resources and oceans as spaces across which
of factors influencing the use of the ocean. people, goods and information flow.
• Socio-economic factors include oceans as means of wealth
Level 3 (5–6 marks) creation, as means of cultural identity or as routes away
Demonstrates thorough knowledge and understanding of from and or toward persecution/insecurity freedom/
factors influencing the use of the ocean. security respectively
• Political factors include management of resources and the
Level 2 (3–4 marks) use of oceans as spaces where countries challenge each
Demonstrates reasonable knowledge and understanding of other.
factors influencing the use of the ocean. • Sustainability of the ‘use’ an important aspect
Level 1 (1–2 marks)
Demonstrates basic knowledge and understanding of factors
influencing the use of the ocean.
0 marks AO2 – 24 marks
No response or no response worthy of credit. Application of knowledge and understanding to analyse and
evaluate the extent to which socio-economic factors influence the
AO2 use of the ocean could potentially include:
Level 4 (19–24 marks)
Demonstrates comprehensive application of knowledge and Socio-economic
understanding to provide a clear, developed and convincing • Use and management of ocean resources including the
analysis that is fully accurate of the extent to which socio- values, attitudes + socio-economic status of stake holders
economic factors influence the use of the ocean could especially in the context of biological resources e.g. krill,
potentially. whales, fish. Culture + heritage can be significant elements
in the use of some resources.
Demonstrates comprehensive application of knowledge and • Globalisation – oceans played a pivotal part in the process.
understanding to provide a detailed and substantiated Economic trading patterns over the centuries and
evaluation that offers secure judgements leading to rational especially 19th century through to today reliant on use of
conclusions that are evidence based as to the extent to which oceans. Also, as routes for submarine cables that carry
socio-economic factors influence the use of the ocean could most digital and voice traffic around the globe.
potentially Mark Scheme June 2025
Relevant concepts are authoritatively discussed. Political
Level 3 (13–18 marks) • Political factors become increasingly influential at a variety
Demonstrates thorough application of knowledge and of scales.
understanding to provide a clear and developed analysis that • Trans-national – UNCLOS and establishment of EEZs and
shows accuracy of the extent to which socio-economic factors other zones extending out from a coastline
influence the use of the ocean could potentially. • Regional bodies such as Arctic Council and in the Antarctic
CCAMLR
Demonstrates thorough application of knowledge and • Organisations with a focus on specific species e.g.
understanding to provide a detailed evaluation that offers International Whaling Commission
generally secure judgements, with some link between rational • Roles of organisations such as Greenpeace, WWF in
conclusions as to the extent to which socio-economic factors debates about ocean use
influence the use of the ocean could potentially. • Use of fish stocks a very significant matter of individual
nations
Relevant concepts are discussed but this may lack some • Challenges and conflicts between nations using ocean
authority. spaces e.g. South China Sea, Baltic
• Oceans as escape roues for refugees e.g. English Channel
Level 2 (7–12 marks)
+ Mediterranean – overlaps with economic factors
Demonstrates reasonable application of knowledge and
• Piracy in some locations
understanding to provide a sound analysis that shows some
accuracy of the extent to which socio-economic factors
Sustainability
influence the use of the ocean could potentially.
• Overlaps socioeconomic and political. Growth in
Demonstrates reasonable application of knowledge and awareness of and concern for conservation of oceans and
understanding to provide a sound evaluation that offers their resources from grassroots and governments.
generalised judgements and conclusions, with limited use of • Establishment of marine reserves, no catch zones,
evidence as to the extent to which socio-economic factors restrictions on exploitation of seabed minerals and drilling
influence the use of the ocean could potentially. for oil + gas involve multiple factors.
Concepts are discussed but their use lacks precision.
Level 1 (1–6 marks)
Demonstrates basic application of knowledge and
understanding to provide a simple analysis that shows limited
accuracy of the extent to which socio-economic factors
influence the use of the ocean could potentially.
Demonstrates basic application of knowledge and
understanding to provide an un-supported evaluation that offersMark Scheme June 2025
simple conclusions as to the extent to which socio-economic
factors influence the use of the ocean could potentially.
Concepts are not discussed or are so inaccurately.
0 marks
No response or no response worthy of credit.
Quality of extended response Level 4
There is a well-developed line of reasoning which is clear and
logically structured. The information presented is relevant and
substantiated.
Level 3
There is a line of reasoning presented with some structure. The
information presented is in the most-part relevant and
supported by some evidence.
Level 2
The information has some relevance and is presented with
limited structure. The information is supported by limited
evidence.
Level 1
The information is basic and communicated in an unstructured
way. The information is supported by limited evidence and the
relationship to the evidence may not be clear
How to answer it
Assessing the Influence of Socio-Economic Factors on Ocean Use
OCR A-Level Geography • Paper 2/3 (Debates / Options) • 33 Marks (Extended Essay)What This Question Tests
This 33-mark synoptic essay requires an in-depth, balanced evaluation of how human societies and economies exploit ocean space and resources, set against counter-factors such as geopolitics, governance frameworks, and environmental sustainability.
- AO1 (9 Marks): Comprehensive factual knowledge of ocean uses (biological, energy, seafloor minerals, trade routes, telecommunications cables) and factors driving them.
- AO2 (24 Marks): Critical evaluation and balanced assessment ( "Assess the extent to which..." ). Weighting socio-economic motives against political jurisdiction (UNCLOS, EEZs) and global sustainability initiatives.
Question 15*: Essay Breakdown & Level Descriptors
Full mark allocation: AO1 = 9 marks, AO2 = 24 marks (Total: 33 marks)
AO1: Knowledge & Understanding (9 Marks)
- Level 4 (7–9 m): Comprehensive, fully detailed breadth across ocean resource categories (biological, mineral, energy, transport/communication lanes).
- Level 3 (5–6 m): Thorough knowledge of factors influencing ocean use with secure examples.
- Level 2 (3–4 m): Reasonable but descriptive understanding; narrow focus on only one or two uses (e.g., fishing or trade only).
- Level 1 (1–2 m): Basic, fragmented recall lacking accurate geographical terminology.
AO2: Application, Analysis & Evaluation (24 Marks)
- Level 4 (19–24 m): Authoritative, nuanced analysis. Sustained evaluation judging whether socio-economic motives dictate use, or whether political laws (UNCLOS) and environmental treaties override them. Evidence-based conclusion.
- Level 3 (13–18 m): Clear analytical arguments with sound evaluation, though some arguments may lack authority or deeper case depth.
- Level 2 (7–12 m): Imbalanced response; mostly descriptive case studies with an evaluation tacked on at the end without critical links.
- Level 1 (1–6 m): Simple, unsupported statements with superficial judgments.
How to Structure a Level 4 Response
Deconstructing the key debates across themes
1. Socio-Economic Factors (The Primary Driver)
- Global Trade & Capital Flows: Over 80% of global merchandise trade by volume moves via maritime shipping corridors (Malacca Strait, Suez Canal). Containerisation drives economic interconnectivity.
- Digital Infrastructure: Over 95% of international internet and data traffic travels through submarine telecommunications cables lying on ocean beds.
- Resource Exploitation: Industrial fishing fleets satisfy global protein demand; offshore hydrocarbons and deep-sea mining of polymetallic nodules support energy and tech sectors.
- Cultural & Subsistence: Traditional whaling and artisanal fishing represent cultural identity and livelihood security (e.g., Inuit subsistence whaling, South East Asian artisanal fleets).
2. Political & Geopolitical Factors (The Counterbalance)
- UNCLOS & EEZs: The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea defines Exclusive Economic Zones (up to 200 nautical miles), regulating sovereign rights over resources.
- Geopolitical Friction: Territorial disputes limit or militarise ocean space, regardless of pure economics (e.g., Nine-Dash Line claims in the South China Sea; militarisation of the Baltic and Arctic routes).
- Regional Management: Multi-nation commissions dictate quotas (e.g., CCAMLR in Antarctica, International Whaling Commission moratoria).
- Migration & Security: Oceans as escape corridors from persecution (Mediterranean and English Channel crossings), requiring naval patrols and international border management.
3. Environmental & Sustainability Pressures (The Constraint)
- Conservation Movements: Environmental NGOs (Greenpeace, WWF) apply consumer pressure and lobby for marine sanctuaries.
- Marine Protected Areas (MPAs): No-take marine reserves restrict commercial fishing, hydrocarbon drilling, and seafloor mining to protect biodiversity (e.g., Chagos Archipelago MPA, Ross Sea reserve).
- Climate Feedbacks: Ocean warming and acidification shift fish stock distributions poleward, constraining regional fishing economies regardless of market demand.
Examiner Commentary: Securing Top Bands
Insights directly aligned with the OCR mark scheme
🧠 Exam Technique: "Weighing Extent"
Avoid simply describing what happens in the oceans. Continually answer "to what extent" throughout your paragraphs:
- Criteria for judgment: Does socio-economic demand provide the initial catalyst, while political frameworks provide the boundary/regulation?
- Scale differentiation: Show how local use (artisanal fishing) is dominated by socio-cultural needs, whereas global deep-sea use requires multi-billion dollar capital and geopolitical consensus.
- Dynamic balance: Conclude whether rising scarcity makes geopolitical competition override economic efficiency in the 21st century.
❌ Common Errors & Pitfalls
- Pure narration: Writing an essay on "threats to coral reefs" or "overfishing" without tying it to socio-economic versus political decision-making.
- Ignoring non-resource use: Forgetting that oceans are communication and data spaces (submarine fiber-optic cables) and migration routes.
- One-sided view: Agreeing entirely that socio-economic factors control everything without discussing UNCLOS, national sovereignty, or conservation moratoria.
- Lack of place detail: Using vague generalisations instead of naming specific choke points (e.g., Strait of Hormuz), conventions (UNCLOS), or regional bodies (Arctic Council).
Topics
Topic 3.3 Exploring Oceans · 2.a. Biological resources within oceans can be used in sustainable or unsustainable ways. · 2.b. The use of ocean energy and mineral resources is a contested issue. · 2.c. Governing the oceans poses issues for the management of resources. · 5.a. Oceans have been and continue to be vital elements in the process of globalisation. · 5.b. Oceans are important spaces where countries challenge each other. · 5.c. Oceans present hazardous obstacles to human activities.
Question and mark scheme from the OCR A-Level Geography examination, Geographical debates (03), June 2025. QuestionVault is an independent revision resource; questions remain the copyright of the awarding body.