OCR A-Level Geography Geographical debates (03), June 2025: Question 15

33 marks · Hard difficulty · Extended Response

Assess the extent to which socio-economic factors influence the use of oceans.

Practise this question

Question

Question 15 marked with an asterisk: 'Assess the extent to which socio-economic factors influence the use of oceans. [33]'
Question text

Assess the extent to which socio‑economic factors influence the use of oceans. [33]

Mark scheme

Show the mark scheme OCR mark scheme for Question 15 worth 33 marks (AO1 9 marks, AO2 24 marks). It sets out level descriptors for AO1 (Levels 1 to 4) and AO2 (Levels 1 to 4) along with quality of extended response criteria. Indicative content notes the range of ocean uses (biological, energy, minerals, transport/trade routes), socio-economic factors (wealth creation, cultural identity, migration routes), political factors (governance, UNCLOS, EEZs, conflict zones, geopolitical treaties), and sustainability concerns.

Question Answer Mark Guidance

Assess the extent to which socio-economic factors 33 Indicative content AO1 – 9 marks

influence the use of the ocean. AO1 x9

AO2 x24 Demonstrating knowledge and understanding of factors

AO1 influencing the use of the ocean could potentially include:

Level 4 (7–9 marks)

• Use of ocean includes biological resources, energy +

Demonstrates comprehensive knowledge and understanding mineral resources and oceans as spaces across which

of factors influencing the use of the ocean. people, goods and information flow.

• Socio-economic factors include oceans as means of wealth

Level 3 (5–6 marks) creation, as means of cultural identity or as routes away

Demonstrates thorough knowledge and understanding of from and or toward persecution/insecurity freedom/

factors influencing the use of the ocean. security respectively

• Political factors include management of resources and the

Level 2 (3–4 marks) use of oceans as spaces where countries challenge each

Demonstrates reasonable knowledge and understanding of other.

factors influencing the use of the ocean. • Sustainability of the ‘use’ an important aspect

Level 1 (1–2 marks)

Demonstrates basic knowledge and understanding of factors

influencing the use of the ocean.

0 marks AO2 – 24 marks

No response or no response worthy of credit. Application of knowledge and understanding to analyse and

evaluate the extent to which socio-economic factors influence the

AO2 use of the ocean could potentially include:

Level 4 (19–24 marks)

Demonstrates comprehensive application of knowledge and Socio-economic

understanding to provide a clear, developed and convincing • Use and management of ocean resources including the

analysis that is fully accurate of the extent to which socio- values, attitudes + socio-economic status of stake holders

economic factors influence the use of the ocean could especially in the context of biological resources e.g. krill,

potentially. whales, fish. Culture + heritage can be significant elements

in the use of some resources.

Demonstrates comprehensive application of knowledge and • Globalisation – oceans played a pivotal part in the process.

understanding to provide a detailed and substantiated Economic trading patterns over the centuries and

evaluation that offers secure judgements leading to rational especially 19th century through to today reliant on use of

conclusions that are evidence based as to the extent to which oceans. Also, as routes for submarine cables that carry

socio-economic factors influence the use of the ocean could most digital and voice traffic around the globe.

potentially Mark Scheme June 2025

Relevant concepts are authoritatively discussed. Political

Level 3 (13–18 marks) • Political factors become increasingly influential at a variety

Demonstrates thorough application of knowledge and of scales.

understanding to provide a clear and developed analysis that • Trans-national – UNCLOS and establishment of EEZs and

shows accuracy of the extent to which socio-economic factors other zones extending out from a coastline

influence the use of the ocean could potentially. • Regional bodies such as Arctic Council and in the Antarctic

CCAMLR

Demonstrates thorough application of knowledge and • Organisations with a focus on specific species e.g.

understanding to provide a detailed evaluation that offers International Whaling Commission

generally secure judgements, with some link between rational • Roles of organisations such as Greenpeace, WWF in

conclusions as to the extent to which socio-economic factors debates about ocean use

influence the use of the ocean could potentially. • Use of fish stocks a very significant matter of individual

nations

Relevant concepts are discussed but this may lack some • Challenges and conflicts between nations using ocean

authority. spaces e.g. South China Sea, Baltic

• Oceans as escape roues for refugees e.g. English Channel

Level 2 (7–12 marks)

+ Mediterranean – overlaps with economic factors

Demonstrates reasonable application of knowledge and

• Piracy in some locations

understanding to provide a sound analysis that shows some

accuracy of the extent to which socio-economic factors

Sustainability

influence the use of the ocean could potentially.

• Overlaps socioeconomic and political. Growth in

Demonstrates reasonable application of knowledge and awareness of and concern for conservation of oceans and

understanding to provide a sound evaluation that offers their resources from grassroots and governments.

generalised judgements and conclusions, with limited use of • Establishment of marine reserves, no catch zones,

evidence as to the extent to which socio-economic factors restrictions on exploitation of seabed minerals and drilling

influence the use of the ocean could potentially. for oil + gas involve multiple factors.

Concepts are discussed but their use lacks precision.

Level 1 (1–6 marks)

Demonstrates basic application of knowledge and

understanding to provide a simple analysis that shows limited

accuracy of the extent to which socio-economic factors

influence the use of the ocean could potentially.

Demonstrates basic application of knowledge and

understanding to provide an un-supported evaluation that offersMark Scheme June 2025

simple conclusions as to the extent to which socio-economic

factors influence the use of the ocean could potentially.

Concepts are not discussed or are so inaccurately.

0 marks

No response or no response worthy of credit.

Quality of extended response Level 4

There is a well-developed line of reasoning which is clear and

logically structured. The information presented is relevant and

substantiated.

Level 3

There is a line of reasoning presented with some structure. The

information presented is in the most-part relevant and

supported by some evidence.

Level 2

The information has some relevance and is presented with

limited structure. The information is supported by limited

evidence.

Level 1

The information is basic and communicated in an unstructured

way. The information is supported by limited evidence and the

relationship to the evidence may not be clear

How to answer it

Assessing the Influence of Socio-Economic Factors on Ocean Use

OCR A-Level Geography • Paper 2/3 (Debates / Options) • 33 Marks (Extended Essay)

What This Question Tests

This 33-mark synoptic essay requires an in-depth, balanced evaluation of how human societies and economies exploit ocean space and resources, set against counter-factors such as geopolitics, governance frameworks, and environmental sustainability.

  • AO1 (9 Marks): Comprehensive factual knowledge of ocean uses (biological, energy, seafloor minerals, trade routes, telecommunications cables) and factors driving them.
  • AO2 (24 Marks): Critical evaluation and balanced assessment ( "Assess the extent to which..." ). Weighting socio-economic motives against political jurisdiction (UNCLOS, EEZs) and global sustainability initiatives.

Question 15*: Essay Breakdown & Level Descriptors

Full mark allocation: AO1 = 9 marks, AO2 = 24 marks (Total: 33 marks)

AO1: Knowledge & Understanding (9 Marks)

  • Level 4 (7–9 m): Comprehensive, fully detailed breadth across ocean resource categories (biological, mineral, energy, transport/communication lanes).
  • Level 3 (5–6 m): Thorough knowledge of factors influencing ocean use with secure examples.
  • Level 2 (3–4 m): Reasonable but descriptive understanding; narrow focus on only one or two uses (e.g., fishing or trade only).
  • Level 1 (1–2 m): Basic, fragmented recall lacking accurate geographical terminology.

AO2: Application, Analysis & Evaluation (24 Marks)

  • Level 4 (19–24 m): Authoritative, nuanced analysis. Sustained evaluation judging whether socio-economic motives dictate use, or whether political laws (UNCLOS) and environmental treaties override them. Evidence-based conclusion.
  • Level 3 (13–18 m): Clear analytical arguments with sound evaluation, though some arguments may lack authority or deeper case depth.
  • Level 2 (7–12 m): Imbalanced response; mostly descriptive case studies with an evaluation tacked on at the end without critical links.
  • Level 1 (1–6 m): Simple, unsupported statements with superficial judgments.

How to Structure a Level 4 Response

Deconstructing the key debates across themes

1. Socio-Economic Factors (The Primary Driver)

  • Global Trade & Capital Flows: Over 80% of global merchandise trade by volume moves via maritime shipping corridors (Malacca Strait, Suez Canal). Containerisation drives economic interconnectivity.
  • Digital Infrastructure: Over 95% of international internet and data traffic travels through submarine telecommunications cables lying on ocean beds.
  • Resource Exploitation: Industrial fishing fleets satisfy global protein demand; offshore hydrocarbons and deep-sea mining of polymetallic nodules support energy and tech sectors.
  • Cultural & Subsistence: Traditional whaling and artisanal fishing represent cultural identity and livelihood security (e.g., Inuit subsistence whaling, South East Asian artisanal fleets).

2. Political & Geopolitical Factors (The Counterbalance)

  • UNCLOS & EEZs: The United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea defines Exclusive Economic Zones (up to 200 nautical miles), regulating sovereign rights over resources.
  • Geopolitical Friction: Territorial disputes limit or militarise ocean space, regardless of pure economics (e.g., Nine-Dash Line claims in the South China Sea; militarisation of the Baltic and Arctic routes).
  • Regional Management: Multi-nation commissions dictate quotas (e.g., CCAMLR in Antarctica, International Whaling Commission moratoria).
  • Migration & Security: Oceans as escape corridors from persecution (Mediterranean and English Channel crossings), requiring naval patrols and international border management.

3. Environmental & Sustainability Pressures (The Constraint)

  • Conservation Movements: Environmental NGOs (Greenpeace, WWF) apply consumer pressure and lobby for marine sanctuaries.
  • Marine Protected Areas (MPAs): No-take marine reserves restrict commercial fishing, hydrocarbon drilling, and seafloor mining to protect biodiversity (e.g., Chagos Archipelago MPA, Ross Sea reserve).
  • Climate Feedbacks: Ocean warming and acidification shift fish stock distributions poleward, constraining regional fishing economies regardless of market demand.

Examiner Commentary: Securing Top Bands

Insights directly aligned with the OCR mark scheme

🧠 Exam Technique: "Weighing Extent"

Avoid simply describing what happens in the oceans. Continually answer "to what extent" throughout your paragraphs:

  • Criteria for judgment: Does socio-economic demand provide the initial catalyst, while political frameworks provide the boundary/regulation?
  • Scale differentiation: Show how local use (artisanal fishing) is dominated by socio-cultural needs, whereas global deep-sea use requires multi-billion dollar capital and geopolitical consensus.
  • Dynamic balance: Conclude whether rising scarcity makes geopolitical competition override economic efficiency in the 21st century.

❌ Common Errors & Pitfalls

  • Pure narration: Writing an essay on "threats to coral reefs" or "overfishing" without tying it to socio-economic versus political decision-making.
  • Ignoring non-resource use: Forgetting that oceans are communication and data spaces (submarine fiber-optic cables) and migration routes.
  • One-sided view: Agreeing entirely that socio-economic factors control everything without discussing UNCLOS, national sovereignty, or conservation moratoria.
  • Lack of place detail: Using vague generalisations instead of naming specific choke points (e.g., Strait of Hormuz), conventions (UNCLOS), or regional bodies (Arctic Council).
Examiner Tip for 30+ Marks: Top-band candidates explicitly recognise that socio-economic factors and political factors are deeply intertwined: economic demand drives nations to exert political jurisdiction (e.g., claiming Arctic continental shelves to exploit prospective oil and gas reserves).

Topics

Topic 3.3 Exploring Oceans · 2.a. Biological resources within oceans can be used in sustainable or unsustainable ways. · 2.b. The use of ocean energy and mineral resources is a contested issue. · 2.c. Governing the oceans poses issues for the management of resources. · 5.a. Oceans have been and continue to be vital elements in the process of globalisation. · 5.b. Oceans are important spaces where countries challenge each other. · 5.c. Oceans present hazardous obstacles to human activities.

Question and mark scheme from the OCR A-Level Geography examination, Geographical debates (03), June 2025. QuestionVault is an independent revision resource; questions remain the copyright of the awarding body.