OCR A-Level Geography Geographical debates (03), June 2025: Question 16

33 marks · Hard difficulty · Extended Response

Evaluate the extent to which the use of biological ocean resources will ever be sustainable.

Practise this question

Question

Question 16* asking: 'Evaluate the extent to which the use of biological ocean resources will ever be sustainable. [33]'
Question text

Evaluate the extent to which the use of biological ocean resources will ever be sustainable. [33]

Mark scheme

Show the mark scheme Mark scheme for Question 16* showing a levels-based assessment grid worth 33 marks (AO1: 9 marks across 4 levels, AO2: 24 marks across 4 levels, plus Quality of extended response descriptors). Indicative content for AO1 includes the tragedy of the commons, renewable biological ocean resources such as krill, whales, and fish, resilience of resources, and ocean management like EEZs and MPAs. Indicative content for AO2 includes evaluation of an ecosystem approach, CCAMLR, satellite monitoring, the International Whaling Commission, Marine Stewardship Council certification, and challenges in policing vast oceans.

Question Answer Mark Guidance

Evaluate the extent to which the use of biological ocean Indicative content

resources will ever be sustainable.

AO1 – 9 marks

AO1 Demonstrating knowledge and understanding of the use of

Level 4 (7–9 marks) biological ocean resources could potentially include:

Demonstrates comprehensive knowledge and understanding • Tragedy of the commons.

of the use of biological ocean resources. • Renewable biological ocean resources e.g. krill, whales,

fish

Level 3 (5–6 marks) • Use and management of resources, resilience of

Demonstrates thorough knowledge and understanding of the resources and key thresholds for sustainable use.

use of biological ocean resources. • Management of oceans e.g. EEZ, EFZ, Marine reserves,

MPAs.

Level 2 (3–4 marks)

Demonstrates reasonable knowledge and understanding of the Use of non-biological resources e.g. oil are not accepted.

use of biological ocean resources.

AO2 – 24 marks

Level 1 (1–2 marks) Application of knowledge and understanding to analyse and

Demonstrates basic knowledge and understanding of the use evaluate the extent to which the use of biological ocean resources

of biological ocean resources. will ever be sustainable could potentially include:

0 marks • Widely recognised that an ‘ecosystem’ approach to

No response or no response worthy of credit. management is most effective as it recognises the

interconnectedness of an environment e.g. CCAMLR.

AO2

• Increasing use made of satellite technology to monitor vast

Level 4 (19–24 marks)

ocean areas

Demonstrates comprehensive application of knowledge and

• Krill in Southern Ocean. CCAMLR set up in 1982 –

understanding to provide a clear, developed and convincing

generally considered effective in its management of

analysis that is fully accurate of the use of biological ocean

marine resources. Helped develop Marine Protected Areas

resources.

(MPAs) e.g. Ross Sea; combatted illegal fishing; reduced

sea bird by-catch levels; rebuilding fish stocks e.g.

Demonstrates comprehensive application of knowledge and

toothfish

understanding to provide a detailed and substantiated

evaluation that offers secure judgements leading to rational • International Whaling Commission (IWC) – history of

conclusions that are evidence based as to the extent to which success – 1986 moratorium on commercial whaling → ↑ in

the use of biological ocean resources will ever be sustainable. some species numbers e.g. sperm, blue and humpback.

• Fish - Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) certify fisheries

Relevant concepts are authoritatively discussed. that meet sustainability standards. Some fisheries seem to

Mark Scheme be sustainable e.g. cod in NE Atlantic (Barents Sea andJune 2025

Level 3 (13–18 marks) Iceland). Local scale examples of success e.g. Cornish

Demonstrates thorough application of knowledge and hake + Shetland brown crabfisheriesassessedat‘healthy’.Some two thirds of tunalevelse.g.skipjack+

understanding to provide a clear and developed analysis that41 yellowfin stocks.

shows accuracy of the use of biological ocean resources. • Challenge to police ocean areas simply due to vastness

of ocean spaces and extreme weather and sea

Demonstrates thorough application of knowledge and conditions.

understanding to provide a detailed evaluation that offers • Need to distinguish amongst different populations of the

generally secure judgements, with some link between rational same species in different locations. Can be mis-leading

conclusions as to the extent to which the use of biological ocean to talk about a species in general.

resources will ever be sustainable. • Krill - acoustic surveys suggest severe decline (80%)

since 1970s, supporting boom and bust theories. Only 5

Relevant concepts are discussed but this may lack some countries harvest krill, Norway accounts for ½ annual

authority. catch – non-sustainable so far, desire for wider political

pressure less as most of the world not involved. Krill

Level 2 (7–12 marks) trawlers have limited space where they can operate, so

Demonstrates reasonable application of knowledge and sustainably fishing over a large area is unlikely to be

understanding to provide a sound analysis that shows some achievable.

accuracy of the use of biological ocean resources. • Whales – some populations continue to be ‘endangered

e.g. North Pacific Right and others recovering very slowly

Demonstrates reasonable application of knowledge and e.g. some bowhead populations. IWC subject to much

understanding to provide a sound evaluation that offers political ‘back and forth’ with some whaling nations

generalised judgements and conclusions, with limited use of claiming their current whaling is for ‘scientific purposes’

evidence as to the extent to which the use of biological ocean e.g. Norway.

resources will ever be sustainable. • Fisheries – North Sea cod are identified by most

scientists as being fished unsustainably especially in

Concepts are discussed but their use lacks precision. southern regions. Some tuna populations are also over-

fished.

Level 1 (1–6 marks)

Demonstrates basic application of knowledge and

understanding to provide a simple analysis that shows limited

accuracy of the use of biological ocean resources.

Demonstrates basic application of knowledge and

understanding to provide an un-supported evaluation that offers

simple conclusions as to the extent to which the use of biological

ocean resources will ever be sustainable.

Concepts are not discussed or are so inaccurately.

0 marks Mark Scheme June 2025

No response or no response worthy of credit.

Quality of extended response Level 4 42

There is a well-developed line of reasoning which is clear and

logically structured. The information presented is relevant and

substantiated.

Level 3

There is a line of reasoning presented with some structure. The

information presented is in the most-part relevant and supported

by some evidence.

Level 2

The information has some relevance and is presented with

limited structure. The information is supported by limited

evidence.

Level 1

The information is basic and communicated in an unstructured

way. The information is supported by limited evidence and the

relationship to the evidence may not be clear.

How to answer it

OCR A-LEVEL GEOGRAPHY • OCEAN NETWORKS

Evaluating the Future Sustainability of Biological Ocean Resources

What This Question Tests

This 33-mark synoptic essay examines your ability to critically assess whether biological resources in marine environments can ever achieve true long-term sustainability under mounting economic, technological, and governance pressures.

AO1: Knowledge & Understanding (9 Marks)
  • Biological resources (krill, whales, pelagic/demersal finfish).
  • Theoretical concepts: Tragedy of the Commons, maximum sustainable yield (MSY), ecological resilience, tipping points.
  • Spatial governance frameworks: EEZs (Exclusive Economic Zones), MPAs, high-seas legal voids.
AO2: Application & Evaluation (24 Marks)
  • Effectiveness of multilateral management (e.g. CCAMLR, IWC, MSC, UNCLOS).
  • Spatial variation: coastal territorial waters vs vast, unpoliced high-seas commons.
  • Technological enforcement (satellite AIS tracking) vs geopolitical resistance & economic greed.
  • Balanced, evidence-substantiated judgement addressing the temporal element ("will EVER be").

Question 16* Breakdown & Strategy

Deconstructing the prompt: "Evaluate the extent to which the use of biological ocean resources will ever be sustainable. [33]"

🧠 Exam Technique: Unpacking the Prompt

  • Command Word ("Evaluate"): You must weigh up successes vs failures and make a clear, supported judgement throughout your response—not just tacked onto the end.
  • Temporal Keyword ("Will ever be"): Assess whether emerging tech (satellite radar, AI monitoring, eDNA) and treaty evolution can overcome inherent structural limits, or if climate change and demand will always outpace management.
  • Scope Constraint: Only biological resources (fish, krill, marine mammals, algae). Physical or mineral resources (crude oil, natural gas, seabed polymetallic nodules) receive zero marks.

❌ Major Pitfall: Topic Drift

Examiners noted that lower-scoring candidates wrote pages about offshore oil rigs (e.g. Deepwater Horizon), deep-sea manganese mining, or general plastic pollution. The specification classifies these as non-biological or pollution topics. Confining discussion solely to living biotic resources is an absolute prerequisite for Level 3/4.

💡 Core Geographic Knowledge (AO1)

Essential concepts needed to anchor top-level evaluation

Key Concept: Tragedy of the Commons

Proposed by Garrett Hardin (1968), describing an open-access resource where individual actors act independently according to self-interest, depleting or spoiling the shared resource despite it being contrary to the common good.

  • 64% of the world's oceans are High Seas (beyond 200 nautical mile EEZs).
  • Absence of single-state sovereignty fosters illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing.

Key Concept: Tipping Points & MSY

Maximum Sustainable Yield (MSY): The largest catch that can be taken over an indefinite period without leading to population collapse.

  • If biomass falls below critical reproductive thresholds, trophic cascades occur.
  • Recovery can be non-linear or virtually non-existent (e.g. Grand Banks cod).

Evaluating Case Studies: Can They Be Sustainable? (AO2)

Detailed analysis of specific biological marine resources

Biological Resource Evidence of Sustainable Practice (Success) Evidence of Failure / Unsustainability (Limits) Evaluative Synthesis
Antarctic Krill
(Euphausia superba)
CCAMLR (est. 1982): Sets rigorous precautionary catch limits (~620,000 tonnes in Area 48, well below 1% of total biomass); establishes Marine Protected Areas (Ross Sea MPA). Acoustic surveys show up to 80% decline in krill density since the 1970s. Industrial super-trawlers use continuous vacuum pumping. Concentration of fishing effort along coastal foraging grounds of penguins and seals. Sustainable on paper via macro-quotas, but spatially unsustainable due to localized over-extraction and climate-induced loss of winter sea ice.
Cetaceans / Whales IWC 1986 Moratorium: Successful recovery of several baleen species (e.g. Humpback whales delisted from endangered; Blue and Fin whale numbers increasing slowly). Special Permit whaling ("scientific research" loophole exploited historically by Japan; commercial quotas retained by Norway and Iceland). North Pacific Right Whale and Vaquita remain critically endangered. Highly effective international consensus for specific charismatic megafauna, but vulnerable to nationalist opt-outs and by-catch/ship collisions.
Commercial Marine Fish
(Cod, Tuna, Pelagic)
MSC Certification & EEZ Quotas: Barents Sea / NE Arctic Cod certified healthy due to strict bilateral Norway-Russia enforcement. Skipjack & Yellowfin tuna showing stability under regional treaties. North Sea cod stocks suffered historic structural depression. High-seas tuna longlining produces massive non-target by-catch. Subsidies drive overcapacity of industrial fleets. Sustainability depends directly on spatial jurisdiction: well-managed within strong sovereign EEZs; heavily overexploited across open-ocean migratory corridors.

📐 Quantitative Insight: Population Thresholds

  1. Acoustic Krill Decline: ~80% reduction in krill abundance in SW Atlantic sectors since 1976.
  2. Global Overexploitation: FAO estimates 35.4% of global marine fish stocks are fished at biologically unsustainable levels (compared to 10% in 1974).
  3. Spatial Enforcement Void: Only ~3% of the High Seas is fully or highly protected in implemented MPAs.

🧠 Differentiating Species vs Populations

A common examiner praise point is distinguishing between an entire species and specific geographic populations. For example: "It is misleading to claim 'cod is unsustainably fished'—while North Sea stocks have struggled to recover, Barents Sea NE Arctic cod is managed robustly near MSY through joint bilateral governance."

Model Essay Structure for Level 4 (29–33 Marks)

How to structure your argument for maximum AO1 & AO2 integration

1. Introduction & Conceptual Framework

Define biological ocean resources. Define sustainability using the classic Brundtland framing: meeting present nutritional/economic needs without compromising future marine ecosystem function or biomass resilience. Introduce Hardin’s Tragedy of the Commons and the pivotal role of UNCLOS/EEZs in splitting oceans into sovereign vs open-access regimes. Thesis: Complete sustainability across all ocean resources will never be achieved globally due to unpoliced high-seas commons and escalating climate stressors, though localized sustainability within sovereign EEZs and ecosystem-based treaties (CCAMLR) demonstrates it is possible in enclosed contexts.

2. Paragraph 1: High Seas Pelagic Fisheries & Structural Governance Limits

Examine industrial finfish harvesting. Contrast sovereign shelf waters (EEZ enforcement via vessel tracking systems) with the High Seas. Explain why market-based interventions (e.g. MSC blue tick certification) fail to eliminate IUU fishing due to flags of convenience and transshipment at sea. Conclude that high-seas mobile species (bluefin tuna) will struggle ever to be truly sustainable.

3. Paragraph 2: Trophic Base Pressures – Antarctic Krill & CCAMLR

Evaluate the Southern Ocean krill fishery. Highlight CCAMLR as the gold standard of ecosystem-based management that accounts for dependent predator species (penguins, seals). Balance this with technological expansion: specialized super-trawlers concentrate catches in narrow coastal channels, amplifying local ecological collapse despite broad-scale quotas.

4. Paragraph 3: Charismatic Megafauna & The Limits of Moral Consensus

Evaluate whale conservation through the 1986 IWC moratorium. Show that global bans can rebuild populations (humpback whales), proving biological recovery is biologically possible if harvesting stops. However, evaluate limits: political fragility (nations utilizing scientific exemptions or withdrawing), showing that economic and cultural priorities can fracture global treaties at any time.

5. Synoptic Conclusion & Final Judgement

Address the word "EVER" directly. Argue that while technological breakthroughs (satellite radar, AIS algorithmic tracking, eDNA biodiversity surveillance) provide unprecedented monitoring capability, biological sustainability will always be compromised by background abiotic forcings (ocean warming, acidification, deoxygenation) shifting baselines. True sustainability will remain fragmented—achievable within strictly monitored national EEZs, but unachievable across open global commons.

Examiner Insights & Mark Scheme Nuance

What Distinguishes Level 4 (Top Band) Responses?

  • Nuanced terminology: Accurate deployment of terms like ecosystem-based management, by-catch mitigation, trophic cascading, and transshipment.
  • Multi-scale evaluation: Recognising that oceans operate across scales—global treaties (IWC, UNCLOS, High Seas Treaty), regional bodies (CCAMLR, RFMOs), and bilateral agreements (Norway-Russia cod pact).
  • Avoidance of binary thinking: Level 4 answers do not say "fishing is bad and unsustainable"; they identify where it works (MSC certified fisheries) and where it fails.

Where Candidates Lost Marks

  • Broad generalizations: Treating "fish" or "whales" as homogeneous blobs rather than pointing out differences between healthy Barents Sea cod vs endangered North Sea cod.
  • Descriptive narrative: Spending 3 pages describing how a trawl net works without evaluating whether catch limits are actually adhered to or enforced.
  • Ignoring abiotic interactions: Forgetting that biological sustainability is directly degraded by climate change destroying breeding habitats (e.g. loss of sea ice for krill larvae).
Official Marking Breakdown:
• AO1 (9 Marks) : Demonstrates comprehensive, accurate knowledge of biological resources, resilience thresholds, and governance mechanisms (EEZ, MPA, MSY).
• AO2 (24 Marks) : Provides clear, developed, and convincing analysis of whether human institutions can overcome physical ocean challenges to achieve permanent sustainability.

Topics

Topic 3.3 Exploring Oceans · 2.a. Biological resources within oceans can be used in sustainable or unsustainable ways. · 2.c. Governing the oceans poses issues for the management of resources.

Question and mark scheme from the OCR A-Level Geography examination, Geographical debates (03), June 2025. QuestionVault is an independent revision resource; questions remain the copyright of the awarding body.